Mike-P

Joined: 25th March 2008

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Mike-P
mikew wrote:
I'm sure I should be able to walk past this (and flakes as well) but I can't.
Either you have got it really bad or I do not have enough imagination because I would have walked by without a second thought

Comment by Mike-P posted on Who can resist this? at 15/04/2009 - 07:37

Mike-P
aminstar wrote:


Mike, almost forgot, and just remembered because you commented on the lightness of the focus ring. I found the Zoom ring of the 150-500 pretty hard and non delicate, in fact pretty rigid. Is that common on these big boys?
I think it is, both the Bigma and the 135-400mm I have on Ebay atm are alike in this respect.
The 70-200mm f2.8 is much better as it is internal, not sure on the 100-300mm f4 but I would presume its the same as the 70-200mm.

Comment by Mike-P posted on The Bigma has arrived at 14/04/2009 - 22:12

Mike-P
Oh, have to say they were both manual focus as well because the Bigma does not AF with the Sigma EX converters.

Manual focus is not easy because the ruddy tripod collar is right in the way but on the plus side its so light you can move it with just your little finger.

Comment by Mike-P posted on The Bigma has arrived at 14/04/2009 - 22:04

Mike-P
Amin, they are roughly about 30ft away the shots are reduced in size for Flickr, uncropped, handheld and the first one is ISO 1600 without any noise reduction software being used.

As for which is best out of the A* 300mm f2.8 with 2X-L teleconverter and Sigma 50-500mm with 1.4X I have to say the Pentax looks to be quite a bit better but I will give them a proper test in the next few days.

The Sigma is excellent quality considering the zoom range though plus having the zoom feature itself makes it a very good lens indeed.

Comment by Mike-P posted on The Bigma has arrived at 14/04/2009 - 21:48

Mike-P
Maybe we are but then its just a pleasant surprise if nothing goes wrong but knowing my luck with electrical equipment I would take the 2 year warranty

Comment by Mike-P posted on Warranty - 2 year or 1 year - how likely is it that a K20D will go wrong? at 14/04/2009 - 20:25

Mike-P
JPC1970 wrote:
Just had a look and the EXIF data says flash didn't fire on that shot.

Jason
I think thats what hes trying to say, the flash did not fire even though it was up.

Comment by Mike-P posted on Fill Flash on a K20D at 14/04/2009 - 20:08

Mike-P
gartmore wrote:
How about a DSLR without the hopeless built in flash?
I use the built in flash 90% of the time when doing macro and find it far from useless.

Comment by Mike-P posted on New Pentax camera? at 14/04/2009 - 20:05

Mike-P
It's not just the second year though is it.
Who would you prefer to deal with if the camera went wrong after a couple of months, a pro dealer like SRS who, from what I can see bend over backwards to help out their customers .. or a chain like Currys (or whever the one year deal is with).

Comment by Mike-P posted on Warranty - 2 year or 1 year - how likely is it that a K20D will go wrong? at 14/04/2009 - 19:38

Mike-P
scottthehat wrote:
hope to see some cracking pics from it mike
Don't worry Scott, we have a plentiful supply of Pigeons

Comment by Mike-P posted on The Bigma has arrived at 14/04/2009 - 18:43

Mike-P
scottthehat wrote:
£400 you got a bargain i would of snapped it up at that price (lucky you mike) well like i said there £1100 new from srs,
It has been touch and go to be honest, the deal nearly didnt happen on a few occasions and I just had visions of him arriving on the doorstep saying he wanted £600 as they had just gone up considerably.

Thankfully he didn't.

Comment by Mike-P posted on The Bigma has arrived at 14/04/2009 - 18:38

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo