All Forum Comments
Comment by Mannesty posted on I can't afford anything! at 19/05/2007 - 20:01
Comment by Mannesty posted on I can't afford anything! at 19/05/2007 - 19:45
OK. There appear to be loads of Pentax Macro lenses on eBay for cheap, but I know nothing.
The true macro lenses, those capable of 1:1 macro's, are fixed focal length.
Comment by Mannesty posted on I can't afford anything! at 19/05/2007 - 19:29
I thought Georges lens was a macro that wouldn't need stacking.
2: It doesn't.
But you said "I can't afford anything" ! ! !
A macro lens is designed such that it can focus from infinity down to very short distances. When focussing at these short distances, its behaviour is not dissimilar to a normal lens (anything from 50 - 100mm'ish) mounted on extension tubes. The latter will not focus at infinity though. The shorter the focal length of a macro lens means that you can (need to) get closer to your subject.
My own preferred macro lens is the SMC Pentax-FA 100mm 1:2.8 which you can see here.
My suggestion of stacking lenses was based on my assumption that you might already have suitable lenses.
Comment by Mannesty posted on I can't afford anything! at 19/05/2007 - 18:19
. . . The 2 lenses I have are a Schneider D-XENON 18-55mm + 50-200mm.
Before my forum account is banned, they are the same camera built in the same factory. Ten feet away from the door the conveyor belt splits into two.
BTW, I don't think your account will be banned. Ridiculed, you might be. Belittled, occasionally. But banned . . . probably not, as long as you display some first class results here.
Comment by Mannesty posted on I can't afford anything! at 19/05/2007 - 07:44
Which lenses do you intend to use?
The SMCP-F 70-210 and the SMCP-F 50 both happen to have 49mm filter threads so a stacking ring was easy to find. Ideally they should both be the same. If you have a zoom with a large filter thread, and a 49mm threaded 50mm lens for instance, you will get vignetting. But your favourite editing software can fix that.
BTW: Macro is much more rewarding with a digital body beccause you can see your results much faster and make necessary adjustments. Not so with film.
Have fun.
Comment by Mannesty posted on I can't afford anything! at 18/05/2007 - 22:57
Is it ok having the contacts exposed like that? And can I get an adaptor from Jessops?
And what's an extension tube...
Comment by Mannesty posted on I can't afford anything! at 18/05/2007 - 22:41
Is it ok having the contacts exposed like that? And can I get an adaptor from Jessops?
And what's an extension tube...
Extension tubes are another method of producing macro images. Usually sold in sets of three tubes of differing lengths. These are usually 12, 20, and 30mm'ish and can be used singly or in any combination of 1, 2, or 3 tubes to give varying magnification. To keep things very simple, the use of extension tubes emulates the function of a macro lens, but a bit more fiddly. they are placed between the camera body and the lens to create an air gap or . . . extension.
Comment by Mannesty posted on I can't afford anything! at 18/05/2007 - 22:35
If you have two suitable lenses and appropriate lighting, or strong daylight, just try it. Then come back and show us some macro pics.
I did exactly this the other day. SMCP-F 70-210 on K10D, SMCP-F 50mm 1:1.7 reversed. Then SMCP-FA 100mm Macro on fully extended bellows, then the same with a 50mm on fully extended bellows. The stacked lenses gave me the highest magnification and little difference in DOF. The shots were just of a 10 centimos coin and handheld so I'm not going to post them here. It was just an experiment anyway. Good luck.
Comment by Mannesty posted on I can't afford anything! at 18/05/2007 - 22:28
If you've never tried it, you'll be amazed. As a test, simply hold a 50mm lens reversed against a 200mm lens or similar. DOF is next to nothing, but hey, that's macro for you.
Comment by Mannesty posted on I can't afford anything! at 18/05/2007 - 22:17

