Magicman

Joined: 23rd April 2014

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Magicman
Thanks Neil

Comment by Magicman posted on FS 50 - 200 mm DA SMC ED WR f 4 - f 5.6 at 02/09/2020 - 19:16

Magicman
Payment received

Comment by Magicman posted on FS 50 - 200 mm DA SMC ED WR f 4 - f 5.6 at 01/09/2020 - 00:05

Magicman
Reserved pending payment

Comment by Magicman posted on FS 50 - 200 mm DA SMC ED WR f 4 - f 5.6 at 31/08/2020 - 10:47

Magicman
neiljgriffs wrote:
Hi have you still got this, looks ideal for my grandson
Yes

Comment by Magicman posted on FS 50 - 200 mm DA SMC ED WR f 4 - f 5.6 at 30/08/2020 - 20:09

Magicman
smc wrote:
Magicman, it’s fine, let’s leave this thread alone. Life is too short to fight over these things.
I have stated my view SMC thats all .

Since I requested the whole post be removed

Comment by Magicman posted on FS : Trio of SMC Lens at 17/08/2020 - 11:13

Magicman
smc wrote:
No I haven’t made any comments. I was however privately accused of dishonesty and lack of integrity when pointing out a defect. Magicman’s comments above can stand as far as I am concerned. As he said in PMs , it’s buyer beware, so please beware.
You stated in your message that is enough, to claim its damaged when it is not is disgraceful. Its old, its used, its integrated hood, its £ 25.00 . Its clear on photos used and its always a risk buying old gear. I regret dealing with you from the start. You were slow, uncommunicative, took ages to pay then under paid postage.

Comment by Magicman posted on FS : Trio of SMC Lens at 17/08/2020 - 10:37

Magicman
johnriley wrote:
I'm not aware that SMC has made any comment whatsoever re this transaction, so are you being a bit previous Patrick?
My post made it clear what happened . He threatened to shame me thats enough but clearly decided he would look even more foolish. However, I stand by my point. Its an old lens, there is no damage to the hood, he was tardy in all his exchanges, he failed to pay the full postage, he failed to reply to several messages asking it arrived etc.

Comment by Magicman posted on FS : Trio of SMC Lens at 17/08/2020 - 10:30

Magicman
I sold a good 200 mm lens to SMC . Firstly, it was clearly an old manual type £ 25.00 is a fair price plus P&P . He took forever to reply to my messages, even longer to pay for it then under paid on postage by £ 1 . I still sent it in good faith , wrapped, protected by first class RM. I then ask him twice more to confirm safe receipt. Nothing back. Now 9 days later he lets me know he finds a fault with the hood. Well, blow he now wants his money back. i have explained its old , it works & the hood was not bent . I declined that request but shall not be blackmailed either as he says he will ' shame me' on this site. Frankly, the guy should be aware you buy in good faith but its £ 25.00 is not £ 250 version & there is no return policy unless you buy from a dealer or amazon. Anyway, thats not the point I would never sell anything in good faith that was not working fine . I have sold & bought several pieces of gear over the years without any hassle on this site. This bloke is clearly, the exception. Patrick .

Comment by Magicman posted on FS : Trio of SMC Lens at 17/08/2020 - 07:52

Magicman
Super lightweight telephoto lens in good condition.

Original caps but no hood.

£ 50 plus P & P Comment Image


Comment Image

Comment by Magicman posted on FS 50 - 200 mm DA SMC ED WR f 4 - f 5.6 at 13/08/2020 - 13:04

Magicman
The 200mm is now sold & dispatched to member SMC

Comment by Magicman posted on FS : Trio of SMC Lens at 08/08/2020 - 09:08

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo