loskeran

Joined: 8th January 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

loskeran
Algernon wrote:
loskeran wrote:
Just think yourself lucky with Pentax you have the choice, Nikon D5100 D7000 D800 etc. You can only use genuine batteries; the “chip” has not been copied for the non-Nikon ones.
EN-EL14 (D5100) around £40
EN-EL15 (D7000-D 800) £65 +
At least Nikon have control over recalling faulty batteries.

link

_
Those recalled were very few and very old stock, I had an email from Nikon about it giving the serial no's, many thousand before mine for my D7000.
If i had the chance i would buy other makes if they carried a CE mark and I do for my K-5, but if you buy from the "Sunday Market" types you take a risk, so if sensible about it why not save youself some money for that new lens or even taking your wife out for a meal.

Comment by loskeran posted on Buying a spare battery at 14/06/2012 - 19:00

loskeran
So who would buy the Hama equivalent battery for the Pentax K-5 from SRS it carries a 5year guarantee?

Comment by loskeran posted on Buying a spare battery at 14/06/2012 - 18:34

loskeran
Just think yourself lucky with Pentax you have the choice, Nikon D5100 D7000 D800 etc. You can only use genuine batteries; the “chip” has not been copied for the non-Nikon ones.
EN-EL14 (D5100) around £40
EN-EL15 (D7000-D 800) £65 +

Comment by loskeran posted on Buying a spare battery at 14/06/2012 - 14:19

loskeran
PM sent. Thanks

Comment by loskeran posted on SMC Pentax-DA 40mm f2.8, with caps, hood, pouch and box at 14/06/2012 - 10:09

loskeran
George Lazarette wrote:
loskeran wrote:

Where the Pentax? motor struggles I feel is all the weather sealing friction, surly they could have fitted a slightly more powerful one, as I’m sure they don’t make the motor assembly them selves.
As for the cost of a better motor, the very small amount would be well worth it.
I can't speak for the other lenses, but on the 16-50, everything that moves is inside. So I don't think the weather-sealing should make any difference.

But I might be wrong!

G
I had the 50-135mm and the 60-250mm, the latter lens would benefit from a better motor, I can't comment on the 16-50mm as I've not used one, but in general the further the focusing parts move the stronger/faster the motor should be.
As for the other point, Nikon, I know on most of their bodies other than the cheapies, use a similar system to Pentax with a screw drive in the camera body, I had a D80.
So they will work with non motorised lenses with the right mount.
Canon on the other hand use only motors in the lenses, ever since they changed to the “EOS” mount.

Comment by loskeran posted on SDM Lenses at 03/10/2009 - 19:25

loskeran
May I add, the Canon/Nikon "Ring" motors are mainly used on the larger lenses, the same as Sigma’s.
Where the Pentax? motor struggles I feel is all the weather sealing friction, surly they could have fitted a slightly more powerful one, as I’m sure they don’t make the motor assembly them selves.
As for the cost of a better motor, the very small amount would be well worth it.

Comment by loskeran posted on SDM Lenses at 03/10/2009 - 18:00

loskeran
Quote:
I doubt if they monitor this forum.

But I could be wrong.
I just hope they are George, Because I personally don't want a camera that is all the colours of the rainbow, I want a “system” that works first class and is good value for money.
Maybe I am from another time, an old fogy that has past his “sell by” date but I am still after that illusive shot, and want the best possible kit to do it with.

Comment by loskeran posted on SDM Lenses at 03/10/2009 - 17:31

loskeran
George Lazarette wrote:
But continually whingeing about things won't help Pentax sell more product, which it needs to do if it is to expand.

I only have one SDM lens, and it works very well. People should worry more about their technique if their aim is to produce good photos, and if their aim is something else they've got their priorities mixed up.

G
No body is whinging George (apart from you), but if you want to stick your head in the sand and say that everything is ok, that’s fine by me.
Pentax have got to be told what we as consumers want for our hard earned money, or we will not buy the goods they have to offer.

Comment by loskeran posted on SDM Lenses at 03/10/2009 - 14:43

loskeran
Greytop wrote:
I like my DA* SDM lenses, OK I agree with Richard they are not 'sports cars' but more like 'warmed up saloons' but mostly they get the job done in a silent manner
Agreed Huw, But if everybody just kept quite about it and just swept it all under the carpet, Pentax will not bother to get their “finger out” and do something about it, it is showing right through the company from customer services to development, If the desire to be up with the “ big boys” is not there then there is only one ending for them, and that will be a very sad day.
So Pentax bosses if you are looking at this thread get it sorted!

Comment by loskeran posted on SDM Lenses at 03/10/2009 - 12:09

loskeran
One thing you must agree on Stefan, is "Supersonic" focusing they are not, wishfull thinking on Pentax's part! IMHO.
I could call my car a Formula 1, but that would be a joke

Comment by loskeran posted on SDM Lenses at 03/10/2009 - 10:43

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo