All Forum Comments
Comment by lemmy posted on Returning to the Scene at 04/09/2009 - 19:40
I have all the lenses I need but if I were buying into a system now, I'd probably choose another system for that reason alone.
No offence, anyone, purely my personal and honest advice.
Comment by lemmy posted on Returning to the Scene at 04/09/2009 - 19:19
I think we where allowed just 2 songs & the light for song 1 terrible!!!!
Plus, no restrictions on their use, full copyright remained with the photog. Those were the days. I stopped covering live gigs when the restrictions started to come in.
A great deal of my library income comes from those gigs still , Abba, The who, Dire Straits, Rod Stewart et al.
I don't know how anyone can make a living from it these days with all the competition climbing all over one another and flogging their work for peanuts. I guess I'm just getting soft in my old age
Comment by lemmy posted on What makes a good photographer? at 04/09/2009 - 19:10
and the slow to use rangefinders.
You could whack straight in on focus in the most appalling light in situations where using flash was impossible - or if there were large and violent people around, inadvisable!
In those cases, too, the virtually silent shutter was a big bonus.
I wish I'd kept more of this stuff but it just seemed like tools when you earned your living with it
Comment by lemmy posted on No Pentax rangefinder. at 04/09/2009 - 18:43
The real world requirements to be a professional photographer are no different to any other business person.
My main question would be if any ambitious photographer would be able to carry a proper business without medium format equipment, digital or not. That would be my first priority, rather than splashing out on a new Nikon system.
These are tough times, though. so good luck.
Comment by lemmy posted on Why i am switching from Pentax to Nikon at 04/09/2009 - 18:25
But then the same applies to ID3 tags for MP3s. It's usually to do with a big company trying to bend the standards to its way of doing things, it seems.
What they miss is that unless a standard is rigidly applied and only extended by industry agreement, they weaken it, not improve it.
Too late now, though
Comment by lemmy posted on ExifTool Tip at 01/09/2009 - 10:49
There aren't half some clever folk around here, aren't there?
Comment by lemmy posted on ExifTool Tip at 31/08/2009 - 23:24
I was referring to the Oggy's picture, following the thread. You seem to be reporting the results on a different picture, of a swan, so I am now very confused.
Does your version report this differently from mine?

Comment by lemmy posted on ExifTool Tip at 31/08/2009 - 22:15
It cannot be the lens itself as at least one at least one program (Photome) reports the lens correctly.
My copy of PhotoMe reports your lens exactly the same as Exiftool, by the way, Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG Macro HSMll.
That's why I thought the lens reported its own information. But your copy of PhotMe reports it differently? Very odd!

Comment by lemmy posted on ExifTool Tip at 31/08/2009 - 16:48
I wonder if sometimes all these extras are assisting or hindering the creative process.
None of the extras do anything that you cannot do for yourself. They just obviate the need for practise and technical know-how.
Personally, I feel that if you do learn to hold the camera still for yourself, ascertain the exposure manually, focus manually and so on, you learn something important about your tools and yourself. Does it matter? Who knows?
And if your camera does have SR, it's really annoying if it doesn't work.
Comment by lemmy posted on shake button blues at 30/08/2009 - 16:46


Bought now, they would have cost me £746 more than I paid for them. In fact, I wouldn't have bought them at those prices.
Life must be getting difficult for the dealers, though.