PLUS

K10D

Joined: 16th January 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

K10D
Yes, some widely varying points of view. As for the negative aspects, video's like this don't help sales.

link

Hopefully, the next Pentax DSLR camera will be trouble free. The QA side of Pentax were probably left unsupervised by Hoya, Ricoh need to take note and get a grip.

Great Expectations?

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on More so called journalists... at 08/07/2011 - 05:38

K10D
cardiff_gareth wrote:
PM sent
If it is you that has won the day Gareth, well done.
The only thing that the Mk1 needs is true inspiration. It's capable (like the 50-135 SDM) of shots that WOW! - it just has the edge of extra length.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on FS: Sigma APO MKI 70-200mm f2.8 at 08/07/2011 - 03:41

K10D
mikeyscope wrote:
John

I wanted a wide angle lens that would offer sharpness to the frame corners for astro related night scenes this Autumn. Even checked out the nearest full frame equivalents for this task but couldn't find another that could exceed it's optical performance at this focal length...I think I've fallen in love with this lens!

Mike
But I suppose it depends on which reviews or views you look at.
link

I use a 17-35 f/2.8 and a 14-24mm f/2.8, both FF on FF, and would not consider the 12-24, FOV(18-36mm), a "better" lens than either of them.

The main thing is that your happy with it.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on So what are you going to do RE: Ricoh purchase of Pentax at 08/07/2011 - 03:36

K10D
Never thought I'd see the day Mike.

I could understand it if the 60-250mm was f/2.8 but there you are. Of three Sigma lenses I have that are "used" 17-50 f/2.8, 70-200 f/2.8 Mk1 and the 50-500 (so slow & dim), the 70-200 will always be a keeper.

To any prospective buyer, this should have already been snapped up and be in the post!

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on FS: Sigma APO MKI 70-200mm f2.8 at 07/07/2011 - 00:32

K10D
Pwynnej wrote:
The 100-400 EF or Nikkor 80-400 are old tech (I've been advised to go for 70-200 plus TC rather than the 80-400.

Even with the D3 and my newly acquired 1.7 TC-17EII won't stop Pentax purchases.
But then there are these new optics scheduled to be announced:

Nikon AF-S VRII Zoom-Nikkor 80-400mm f/4G IF-ED N
Nikon AF-S VRII Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4 IF-ED
Nikon AF-S VRII Micro-Nikkor 70-200mm f/4 IF-ED N
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 85mm f/2G
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 35mm f/2G
Nikon AF-S Nikkor 105mm f/2G
Nikon AF-S DX VRII Zoom-Nikkor 16-70 f/3.5

Lets hope Ricoh are going to do the needful.
A Pentax 200mm macro replacement would be useful.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on So what are you going to do RE: Ricoh purchase of Pentax at 05/07/2011 - 12:51

K10D
A wonderful set. Well done and worth the effort.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on St Cross Hospital - IR on reworked body at 05/07/2011 - 00:59

K10D
[quote:3496ace15f="pentaxanne"]quick strap from ebay really top, i use one for my gx20 and my partner uses the dual version for his d300 with sigma 50-500mm os and d700 with nikon 28-70mm f2.8 on and its spot on.
]http://shop.ebay.co.uk/i.html?_nkw=quick+strap&_sacat=0&_odkw=strap&_osacat=0&_t...

And Jeremy uses his to support a Radio Control unit.

link

Odd that it looks like a Sunsniper Pro?

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Neck Strap recommendations at 04/07/2011 - 07:56

K10D
aliengrove wrote:
K10D wrote:

City Centre Mall has an RC model shop on the 3rd or 4th floor. They sell glo fuel as they sell planes and Heli's etc. I bought an Edge RC aerobatic there. Google for the model flying sites in Qatar.

Best regards
Cool, I will check it out! I have heard people fly models here, but have never seen a shop selling anything. Saying that, I have only ever been in the City centre Mall once.
Lots of activity in Qatar link

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Loud toys....for boys at 03/07/2011 - 03:16

K10D
aliengrove wrote:
That plane in the first picture has no rudder, evidently it relies purely on centrifugal force to keep the lines taut.
Yes and the fact that the bell crank is slightly to the rear of the CG so it's "nose heavy" for centrifugal but not for lift. The first image also has no rudder. The metal rudder is part of the dolly, it prevents the thing from turning in on you during take off by trying to steer the dolly out-over.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Loud toys....for boys at 03/07/2011 - 02:26

K10D
aliengrove wrote:
My day of aerobatics are over sadly Though did some a few years back on a Yak52. It's an expensive hobby.

I still have a control line plane though, which I designed myself (well actually modified heavily: I used the wing off an existing model). It has a glow plug engine which is far too big for the plane, and is very fast and a bit unstable. It's in the UK, I can't get fuel for it here and can't bring any in my luggage unfortunately, but next time I am back I might fire it up again, if the friend I left it with hasn't pranged it.

That plane in the first picture has no rudder, evidently it relies purely on centrifugal force to keep the lines taut.
City Centre Mall has an RC model shop on the 3rd or 4th floor. They sell glo fuel as they sell planes and Heli's etc. I bought an Edge RC aerobatic there. Google for the model flying sites in Qatar.

Best regards

Comment by K10D posted on Loud toys....for boys at 03/07/2011 - 02:20

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo