All Forum Comments
Comment by K10D posted on Hands-On Q in AP at 10/09/2011 - 22:03
Anvh wrote:
By the looks i'll be taking my first steps next month to emigrate to New Zealand
Well if you do get there Anvh and either I get the chance to visit NZ or you visit Perth, I may yet get to buy you that beer. Good luck with the move.By the looks i'll be taking my first steps next month to emigrate to New Zealand
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Hands-On Q in AP at 10/09/2011 - 21:35
Comments appreciated gentlemen.
I don't get to Durham often enough. Many things worth photographing there.
Best regards
I don't get to Durham often enough. Many things worth photographing there.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Pink Panther at 10/09/2011 - 21:31
Moored
Dr Pentax
Best regards
Dr Pentax
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on Pink Panther at 06/09/2011 - 15:57
Cologne on the 4th Sept.
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on demonstration at 06/09/2011 - 09:02
Smeggypants wrote:
Hand cranked, toothed belt traverse mount. He started with ground level footage then moved to upper body footage.08tiger wrote:
That's an interesting set up in 3 and 4, what was being shot down low?
Strange looking mounting rail thing as well.That's an interesting set up in 3 and 4, what was being shot down low?
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on other work going on in Düsseldorf at 06/09/2011 - 08:49
A very hectic four days with a lot of different stuff going on. Got to speak to a lot of togs and look at some superb camera shops.
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on other work going on in Düsseldorf at 05/09/2011 - 21:32
Smeggypants wrote:
There was also a nurse on handSteveEveritt wrote:
A lot of effort gone into those costumes, you wouldn't want to meet any of them in a dark alley though!
I'd make an exception for the one with the sunglasses in the last pic A lot of effort gone into those costumes, you wouldn't want to meet any of them in a dark alley though!
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on some from Düsseldorf at 05/09/2011 - 21:18
Another Zombie shoot.
Best regards
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on some from Düsseldorf at 05/09/2011 - 19:47
MarkTaylor wrote:
You could argue of course that it is a "crop sensor" in relation to a full sized medium format sensor, and indeed be technically correct - but since almost everybody understands the term "crop sensor" to mean cropped in comparison to the size of 35mm film that would be pretty misleading, and in all honesty smacks of being deliberately abstruse.
So Pentax may be technically incorrect to use the term MF, a guess becomes a fact, you agree that technically it's a cropped sensor and I assume "almost everybody" excludes current FF DSLR users.K10D wrote:
645 was the term used based on the 60 x 45mm nominal format.
Best regards
Well rightly or not, Pentax referred to 645 as "Medium Format" and have chosen to refer to the 645D as "Medium Format Digital". In the absence of a better name, I'm guessing that's what everybody else will choose to call it too. In fact that's what they are calling it already in photography magazines, websites, blogs, down the pub over a pint and so forth. So the point you are making is shortly destined to become - if it hasn't already - purely technical pedantry.MarkTaylor wrote:
The 645D's sensor is not a crop sensor, it is a "medium format" sensor. Although it still technically has a "crop factor" (albeit of less than 1 because it's larger than 35mm film) this can more correctly be referred to as a "focal length multiplier" to avoid the confusion - or alternatively for anybody who doesn't know what a focal length multiplier is, make it worse.
A medium format sensor is 56 x 41.5mm, the Pentax sensor is 33x 44mm.The 645D's sensor is not a crop sensor, it is a "medium format" sensor. Although it still technically has a "crop factor" (albeit of less than 1 because it's larger than 35mm film) this can more correctly be referred to as a "focal length multiplier" to avoid the confusion - or alternatively for anybody who doesn't know what a focal length multiplier is, make it worse.
645 was the term used based on the 60 x 45mm nominal format.
Best regards
You could argue of course that it is a "crop sensor" in relation to a full sized medium format sensor, and indeed be technically correct - but since almost everybody understands the term "crop sensor" to mean cropped in comparison to the size of 35mm film that would be pretty misleading, and in all honesty smacks of being deliberately abstruse.
Best regards
Comment by K10D posted on An open Letter to Ricoh at 21/08/2011 - 21:22
Best regards