All Forum Comments
Comment by jules posted on Asking a favour form anyone who owns a K5iiS and a K3 at 26/02/2014 - 07:01
Photographers don't get what Photographers want, more's the pity...
Comment by jules posted on Asking a favour form anyone who owns a K5iiS and a K3 at 26/02/2014 - 06:41
Comment by jules posted on Asking a favour form anyone who owns a K5iiS and a K3 at 26/02/2014 - 05:52
A hi ISO monster would not suit someone like me who almost cries when he has to turn the ISO past 400!
All things considered I think the K3 is a winner but its obviously not for everyone, pity, cause your all missing out!
Comment by jules posted on Asking a favour form anyone who owns a K5iiS and a K3 at 25/02/2014 - 20:22
Not on a Pentax but the technique holds true for anything really...
EVF's aside...
http://www.dpreview.com/forums/post/51438226
David Storm has very kindly uploaded some RAW files for me to play with. Unfortunately the fan on my computer is playing up again and it gets a bit warm when I do too much processing....I'm going to the UK next week and have ordered a new fan, so will finish the experiment then.
However, I have processed three files taken at ISO 6400, -2ev, all of the same scene with the same lens. It's surprised me: the K3 does indeed have more noise, negligibly, but it's very fine-grained, and after a bit of processing there is far more detail than in the K5 and K5iis shots. If I try and get rid of all the noise in the K3 file, there's not much to choose between the three cameras. However, with these ISO 6400 images processed to the point that I think they look good at 100%, and once all the images are resized to a size midway between the K3 and K5 file sizes, the K3 produces the best images imo (significantly so), with the most detail and least noise.
I'll update this for those who are interested once I've processed all the files.
As for my choice of what camera to buy next (I was planning to next week), Ricoh have thrown a spanner in the works as it seems there's some new models coming out.
It's stopped me wanting a K5II (of any version) as a second body and got me looking fwd to a K60, if indeed it's real...
People need to Pony up and buy a K3, test it in the real world, I'm loving mine!
I wish I could afford two like Fletcher8!
ROFL!! you are a funny sometimes Jules.
Comment by jules posted on Asking a favour form anyone who owns a K5iiS and a K3 at 25/02/2014 - 19:48
Really?
Oh I would have never guessed!
Comment by jules posted on Nice little review on the FLU Card at 25/02/2014 - 19:05
I like my batteries to last a couple of hours!
Comment by jules posted on Nice little review on the FLU Card at 25/02/2014 - 18:26
I'd like to see GPS on a card too, don't see why not having pulled apart a lot of Phones with GPS in my time (Used to fix em) the aerials are getting smaller as is all the other componentry and I reckon it'll go on an SD...
So an SD FLU Card in one slot and a GPS one in the other please...
Comment by jules posted on Nice little review on the FLU Card at 25/02/2014 - 16:53


Now before you start along the "You should get it right in camera first time" diatribe Smeggy DON'T! Everything pretty much gets PP'd in some way or you wouldn't have Lightroom! (Actually another thing I have to thank you for, I used to use DXO but you banged on so hard about Lightroom Smeggy I tried it and the rest is history...)
K3 needs less because it's just far more accurate also, I print and you cannot tell the diifference noise wise in Print, which is what matters to me but you can print bigger with the same amount of noise, which also matters to me and gives the K3 the win in my humble opinion...
No flaming just a difference of viewing angle...