All Forum Comments
It will need a very rigid barrel and overall high quality contruction and it won't sell vast numbers, so it will be expensive.
Comment by johnriley posted on DA 560mm at 11/09/2012 - 08:11
Comment by johnriley posted on What is this in the rear element? at 11/09/2012 - 07:28
Comment by johnriley posted on New products now on Pentax site at 11/09/2012 - 00:06
I think we should be impressed that Pentax have created such an option. After all, the other alternative is rather more expensive than a K-5 II will ever be.
Comment by johnriley posted on K-5 Mk II at 11/09/2012 - 00:05
It happens every time, so ain't no surprise really.
Comment by johnriley posted on New products now on Pentax site at 11/09/2012 - 00:03
Comment by johnriley posted on New products now on Pentax site at 10/09/2012 - 23:44
Comment by johnriley posted on What is this in the rear element? at 10/09/2012 - 21:37


As the K-5 is such an excellent design as it is, there's no real need to change it completely.
Maybe the FF advocates are right and the next step will be a FF model.
Nothing wrong with a bit of speculation and if they are right then why not.