PLUS

johnriley

Joined: 19th March 2002

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

johnriley
Quote:
orders/deposits are taken for the more exotic lenses and only when the economic number has been ordered would they be manufactured on a batch basis and distributed direct by Pentax.
Unfortunately this could be quite unreliable. Quite often people will say they want something, but when it comes to the crunch they will put it off.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax DA 12-35mm WR DC at 21/12/2010 - 14:46

johnriley
And so the plot thickens! So the 25mm is nearly a 26mm, which in one way is almost a 28mm....goodness, who can we trust?

Comment by johnriley posted on 31 mm ltd at 21/12/2010 - 11:28

johnriley
rparmar wrote:
Stanovich wrote:
A mechanical aperture connection would be much better.
But I'm not holding my breath!
No, I wouldn't either. The system as we have it now has been in operation since the MZ series of DSLRs. K and M series lenses can be used, with restrictions, and the exposure indication may not be accurate. I think we can assume this is integral to the general design constraints, presumably without spending a lot of money on something very few people actually want. I say very few, but I mean that in the total world of users. Here we are out of proportion in this respect.

Comment by johnriley posted on Greatest Feature of a Pentax DSLR at 21/12/2010 - 11:21

johnriley
Already done i-Berg, but there has been no reply so far.

Comment by johnriley posted on Voting Competition #6: Night-time at 21/12/2010 - 09:51

johnriley
As things stand at the moment I would choose the K-5 over the K-r over the K-7 over the K-x. That however is me and each photographer might have different requirements. The K-r inched ahead of the K-7 when it gained its Li-ion battery.

The K-r design is very similar to the lines of Pentax DSLRs that included the *istDS, an excellent camera as well. I like this one wheel design, but not everyone does.

For me, subject to being able to afford it, the K-5 trumps the K-r on the grounds or weather resistance in particular, plus the use of a proper pentaprism.

Comment by johnriley posted on K-r or K7? at 21/12/2010 - 09:47

johnriley
The K-r I tried out was a terrific camera and I would thoroughly recommend it to anyone who doesn't want to run to the expense of the K-5. Or indeed who doesn't want the extra features.

Comment by johnriley posted on K-r or K7? at 21/12/2010 - 02:31

johnriley
Now the lens is sold I'll move this back to Lenses and reinstate the other bits of chat.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax 250-600mm Big Glass at 20/12/2010 - 19:08

johnriley
It loooks like a phone call then - they might do a deal.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentx K-r Kit at 20/12/2010 - 15:24

johnriley
You could start by phoning SRS and Park Cameras and others to see what they have. Or check out their websites first.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentx K-r Kit at 20/12/2010 - 14:57

johnriley
Quote:
There is also the matter of the photo Pentax use on their site of their lens collection, a lot of which have been out of production for many years. This could be regarded as misleading.
That's interesting. I wonder how many of those lenses are actually still available in Japan? A lot of lenses and cameras were wqithdrawn from sale in Europe because of legislation relating to dangerous materials such as Lead. Specifically the 645 and 67 disappeared because of this.

I mention it because the A series 50mm f1.2 was available (assembled in Thailand) in the far East, but not here. There are quite a few others listed on the Japanese site, although I haven't looked recently.

Comment by johnriley posted on Pentax DA 12-35mm WR DC at 20/12/2010 - 14:56

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo