Johnhoward28

Joined: 1st January 2019

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Johnhoward28
Kim C wrote:
Johnhoward28 wrote:
derek897 wrote:
Certainly seems to be performing well judging by those sample shots.
If you don't like it, let me know
Thanks. I do think it is sharp and will work well for most of my needs. The one thing that worries me is that I like to take shots of living insects, and with this lens, I have to get to really close to get a close-up macro. I mean like an inch away. Is there a way to extend this distance out somehow, or do a need another lens for that.

This lens also takes pretty good portraits.
If you want to be further away, you need a longer lens. You could try a 2x multiplier as a "cheap" option. That should allow you to be twice the distance. Other than that you need a longer lens, Most "common" are the 100mm macros. The MF ones (which in my mind are better for macro work than AF) can be had quite cheaply. Though most MF ones only focus to half life size whereas the AF ones tend to go to lifesize. However, that is easily solved by using an extension ring. Good news is that using a ring has no effect on the optical quality.
Could you give me an example fo a good quality low cost 100mm MF macro lens?

Comment by Johnhoward28 posted on Scale of 1 to 10. How would you rate the old Sigma 50mm f/2.8 Macro lens today? at 02/01/2019 - 20:09

Johnhoward28
derek897 wrote:
Certainly seems to be performing well judging by those sample shots.
If you don't like it, let me know
Thanks. I do think it is sharp and will work well for most of my needs. The one thing that worries me is that I like to take shots of living insects, and with this lens, I have to get to really close to get a close-up macro. I mean like an inch away. Is there a way to extend this distance out somehow, or do a need another lens for that.

This lens also takes pretty good portraits.
Comment Image

Comment Image

Comment by Johnhoward28 posted on Scale of 1 to 10. How would you rate the old Sigma 50mm f/2.8 Macro lens today? at 02/01/2019 - 19:14

Johnhoward28
Here are some test shots I took last night. Tell me what you think of how the lens performed with a focus and what could be improved in another lens choice (if anything)

Mode: Auto with LED computer reading light for light source.
Comment Image








Mode: Auto with LED computer reading light for light source.
Comment Image





Mode: Auto Superior with LED computer reading light for light source.
Comment Image






Mode: Shutter Priority with shoe mounted External flash with diffuser
Comment Image





Mode: Shutter Priority with shoe mounted External flash with diffuser
Comment Image





Mode Auto with late afternoon natural light.
Comment Image

Comment by Johnhoward28 posted on Scale of 1 to 10. How would you rate the old Sigma 50mm f/2.8 Macro lens today? at 02/01/2019 - 17:45

Johnhoward28
I was given an old Sigma 50mm f/2.8 1:1 Manual Focus Macro Lens for Pentax KA/K7/PKA/K-1. I am just wondering how you would rate this lens in comparison with what is available today? On a scale of 1 thru 10, 1 being a cheap kit macro lens and 10 being the best macro lens money can buy; where would you rate this sigma macro lens?

Comment by Johnhoward28 posted on Scale of 1 to 10. How would you rate the old Sigma 50mm f/2.8 Macro lens today? at 01/01/2019 - 21:16

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo