davex

Joined: 13th January 2009

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

davex
Certainly is a difference.
For another comparison this is my latest shot using 150-500 OS @440mm;
Taken 5 days ago so not quite full, you can see some Earthshine on the rim.
Comment Image

Comment by davex posted on Full moon 10/11/11 - first one with the Bigma at 11/11/2011 - 10:10

davex
Quote:
The lens was a Sigma 50-150 HSM
LOL, I was waiting for you to say DA*50-135, your Sigma is certainly delivering the goods.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on 3 Goths at 10/11/2011 - 19:31

davex
Quote:
Problem is, if I'm not happy with it I will not be able to buy another
At it`s current price you will not get anywhere near 500mm with any other option, where are you based? if anywhere near Chester am happy to let you have a play with mine.

In test`s I have tried the lens OS is a good as my K5 SR.
I know some folks may shout at this, but TBH I frequently leave them both on, does not seem to make any difference, have not found any observable evidence that they may cancel each other out, as alleged by others.



Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Long Lens at 10/11/2011 - 17:26

davex
Quote:
has anyone got or tried the Sigma 150-500mm F5-6.3 APO DG HSM OS
Do a forum search, you will find lots of very happy owners, including me.
At the current prices it is a steal.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Long Lens at 10/11/2011 - 17:03

davex
A cracking set, the 4th one is particularly good.

Davex

Comment by davex posted on A Few from Last Week - More Added at 10/11/2011 - 17:01

davex
Agree with Andrew, very strong portrait well posed.
Also quite like the one before it, the shadow from the nose adds interest, although am sure some critics might argue differently.
Good smooth backgrounds in all of these, none of them intrude, apart from perhaps the first one.
What lens did you use?

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on 3 Goths at 10/11/2011 - 09:35

davex
I think Sigma do a 500mm f4 in K mount, arm + leg gets the lens, then you need both kidneys to get the tripod and head to use the thing.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Long Lenses at 10/11/2011 - 08:45

davex
TBH do not like the 1.7x af
Tried one for a few months, never realy got on with it,I am aware of it`s perceived desirability in Pentax world, but as i say not for me.

I have a 1.5x (cannot remember all the letters) that works well with SDM and screwdrive, it even works with my 18-135 WR.
Will pair that with the 300mm when I decide what to go for, atm I do not need weatherproofing so the F* is favourite, however will know next week if I am going to spend some time in a tropical rainforrest, if so then the DA* will probably be required.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on F* 300 f4.5 or DA * 300 f4? at 09/11/2011 - 13:00

davex
Anybody able to offer a direct comparison of above?
Am aware of the differeces in weight and weathersealing, but how do the different focus mechanisms compare?


Davex.

Comment by davex posted on F* 300 f4.5 or DA * 300 f4? at 09/11/2011 - 10:03

davex
My brother used to service ejector seats for the R.A.F. It`s only when you see video of one in action that you truly understand just how powerfull they are. A real shame, whatever the reasion it seems like such a tragic waste, hopefully the enquiry will prevent a future occurance.

Davex.

Comment by davex posted on Another Red Arrows Pilot dies. at 08/11/2011 - 20:07

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo