All Forum Comments
Comment by Dangermouse posted on miranda-pro 3 at 12/12/2010 - 12:34
Why? Well when you over-cook sprouts they undergo a chemical change which makes them more likely to produce gas while being digested!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 12/12/2010 - 12:29
You could also keep your eyes open for the genuine Pentax filter to suit, assuming one was made. I have one of their yellow filters and it's the only one which lens caps will fit over properly as it's made to precisely the same dimensions as the rest of the lens barrel.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Filter for F6.7 135-600 Lens at 12/12/2010 - 11:07
Comment by Dangermouse posted on So what do you think of the Royal photos/ at 12/12/2010 - 11:03
Actually fair comment Oggy - I remember in the late 50s my grand dad who was a chemist/pharmacist used to sell "curry powder" - certainly not available at the local grocers store.Before Elizabeth David I doubt many people had heard of Courgettes or Aubergines or Capsicums ( peppers ) , and garlic was foreign muck along with smelly cheese and wine !
Foreigners had long loaves called French sticks and the only Chinese restaurants were in places like Duke Street in Liverpool - and they were frequented only by the Chinese or "well off" people like my dad and us.The Italians arrived in Liverpool in the 60s with some disgraceful excuses for their National cuisine - most of them knew nothing of food or hospitality but were prepared to start off businesses for the "hungry" Brits.Only the advent of Package Tours and Spanish holidays broadened our outlook and - in some cases - matured our palates.
Interesting that now our national dishes seem to be curries or kebabs and the good old fish & chips are sold in the main by Chinese,Greek and other Europeans..........................
Tony
British food isn't the problem, it's shoddy ingredients and poor preparation. Too many alleged cooks who thought that boiling the living daylights out of it was an acceptable method of cookery and turned everything into bland mush.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Another pointless thread at 12/12/2010 - 10:48
£79 for K version is a STEAL IMO. I sold my a year ago for £120!
I already have the DA 35/2.4 which is probably the best walkabout lens for the money, but I quite fancy an ultrawide for my film bodies.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on Anyone use an A or FA 24mm/28mm with digital? at 10/12/2010 - 13:49
I have one of each of the MV and the MV1, part of my M series collection. I don't have every variant, but I do have at least one of each M series model. Doesn't the MV/MV1 have the exp.comp. hidden under the ASA dial?
K.
I'm currently up to four M 50/2s as a result of buying three stupidly cheap ones and already having one from my K1000...
Comment by Dangermouse posted on In praise of the humble MV1 at 09/12/2010 - 23:03
It's not all nostalgia, some of us ENJOY shooting film.
I've got back into film since buying a DSLR, as I can now try all sorts of techniques on digital first to see if they work before using them on film. Film is an excuse to play with wonderfully made old cameras which require a little bit more effort from the user, and also to fiddle around with chemicals and developing tanks.
Comment by Dangermouse posted on negatives to computer at 09/12/2010 - 22:58
The MV seems rarer, it was certainly shorter-lived as it was just a little bit too lightweight and suffered from vibration as said above. The MV1 added a self timer and a coupling for the motor winder.
Glad to see I'm not the only one with multiple examples of the M 50mm f2!
Comment by Dangermouse posted on In praise of the humble MV1 at 09/12/2010 - 17:51
Comment by Dangermouse posted on negatives to computer at 09/12/2010 - 17:43


You could, of course, make a new QR plate by carving one from a wood block (or if you know anyone with access to a milling machine asking them to make a metal one) but I think it'll be a lot less hassle to replace the whole thing.