All Forum Comments
Comment by cliff_occo posted on istDS - What they don't tell you. at 07/04/2005 - 17:21
'I am a new member. My name is Dennis Simmons, born in the UK but now living in Brisbane, Australia. I joined the group as I was considering purchasing the *ist DS for use with my old K Mount, non-A and A lenses and wanted to read of users experiences with their older lenses. The information I found helped me purchase the camera – thank you! My main use of the camera will be for astrophotography through my 4” refractor which has a computer controlled mount that tracks the stars to compensate for the rotation of the Earth. This will allow me to take long exposure images of galaxies, star fields and nebulae.
I’ve had my Pentax *ist DS for a week now and the lack of favourable conditions has prevented me from using it for astrophotography – sigh! After much playing indoors, I thought that I would share my early findings on the functionality of older K mount lenses, as I found the manual a little unclear and somewhat difficult to follow on this topic. Here are some of my observations. Where possible, I have included a reference to the relevant page (Pxxx) in the Pentax *ist DS manual.
TEST 1 – PENTAX K MOUNT 35mm FILM LENSES NON “A”.
For this test, I used the following lenses (year of purchase):
Pentax 50mm f1.8 (1976) as provided with my original Pentax KM
Pentax 135mm f2.5 (1990)
Tokina 500mm f8 mirror lens (1990)
User Modified settings:
To obtain manually focused and correctly exposed images, I had to change four settings (2 hardware, 2 software) as follows:
Setting 1: On the camera body, set the Focus Mode Lever to MF (P121).
Setting 2: In the [C Custom Settings] menu (P100/101) toggle the option “Fl with S lens used” from the default of “1 Unavailable” to “2 Available”
Setting 3: In the [C Custom Settings] menu (P100/101) toggle the option “Using aperture ring” from the default of “1 Prohibited” to “2 Permitted”
Setting 4: Set the Mode Dial (P104/105) to M for Manual.
When scrolling the [C Custom Settings] menu, the options toggled in Settings 2 & 3 above are the first two lines on the 3rd screen (of 4).
Procedure for taking a picture:
With the above 4 settings in their changed state, do the following:
(a) Dial in the aperture manually on the aperture ring of the non A lens (e.g. f
(b) Compose the image.
(c) Manually focus through the viewfinder.
(d) Half depress the shutter release and hold (illustration on P45).
(e) Press the “AE-L” button and you should hear a noise associated with the iris being manually stopped down (the viewfinder darkens momentarily) as the meter takes a reading.
(f) Now fully depress the already half depressed shutter release.
Congratulations – you have just taken a manually focused, correctly exposed image!
Notes:
1. Every time I forgot to press the AE-L button (step (e) above) to manually cause the iris to be stopped down for metering, the resultant image was totally overexposed i.e. a white screen.
2. In the viewfinder, F - - is displayed for the aperture value regardless of what aperture you have manually selected.
TEST 2 – LEICA SPOTTING SCOPE WITH “T” RING
By following the same procedure as above (except that the aperture in not adjustable) I was able to obtain sharp, correctly exposed images by using the Leica photo-adapter and a T ring.
TEST 3- PENTAX K MOUNT 35mm FILM LENSES WITH “A” SETTING.
For this test, I used the following lenses (year of purchase):
Vivitar Series 1 70-200mm f2.8-4 (1990)
Sigma 400mm f5.6 (1989)
Sigma 24mm f2.8 (1992)
Notes:
1. With the aperture ring set to A, the above lenses could be manually focused. The shutter speed and aperture values were displayed in the viewfinder.
2. There was no requirement to press the AE-L button for stopped down manual metering, as the camera could read the values when the lens aperture ring is set to the A position.
3. If you forget to set the Focus Mode Lever to MF, the shutter will not fire.
CONCLUSION:
So, there you have it. It seems that Pentax has indeed maintained backward compatibility with older K mount lenses. All I need now is some good weather so I can test the camera on my Vixen 4” refractor. Please note that the above information is for guidance only and is the result of an afternoon playing with the camera, it may contain errors and misunderstandings.
OTHER FINDINGS:
1. There is a poor man’s mirror lock up (P55) accessed by using the Function Button to set the Self Timer to 2 seconds. When you release the shutter, the mirror flips up and then after approximately 2 seconds, the exposure is made.
2. My old Pentax right angle viewfinder will not attach to the *ist DS, even with the rubber eye guard removed – oh well.
Cheers
Dennis'
Cliff
Comment by cliff_occo posted on istDS - What they don't tell you. at 01/03/2005 - 10:05
Comment by cliff_occo posted on Prime lenses at 22/02/2005 - 14:03
'Yes. Interestingly enough, they say they used a Sigma 18-50mm f/3.5-5.6 DC and 55-200mm f/4 - 5.6 DC in each case (+1gb Sandisk Ultra 11 card, for what that's worth)'
If the review is intended as a consumer review it seems to me (after thinking about it in the 'wee' [with two meanings to the word!] small hours), then to use independant lenses is flawed. Buyers will fall into two categories:-
(a) existing users of fim SLRs of ther four brands referred to - in which case they will already have a supply of lenses and will unlikely want to buy an independant lens, ignoring the Olympus which, of course, is a different matter, and I guess buyers of that will be similiar to:-
(b) 1st time buyers of SLRs who are likely to buy the camera (of whichever make) in kit form anyway
There is a third catergory, like me, who, whilst having a number of lenses, brought the kit lens because of its wide angle capabilities, knowing I would loose on my existing due to the focal length shift.
Comment by cliff_occo posted on *ist DS Test in AP at 23/02/2005 - 10:41
Yes. Interestingly enough, they say they used a Sigma 18-50mm f/3.5-5.6 DC and 55-200mm f/4 - 5.6 DC in each case (+1gb Sandisk Ultra 11 card, for what that's worth)
I suppose using an independent lens is a not unfair way of conducting a comparative test.
Comment by cliff_occo posted on *ist DS Test in AP at 22/02/2005 - 19:59
Digital Photo also did a 4 way comparison(*istDS, EOS300D, D70 and E300) in current issue. In the image comparison the Pentax gets the lowest score, yet to my eye the images are on a par with those taken with the Canon, which got the top score, and better than the D70 which got a higher score!
I posted remarks like this in a general photo forum of which I am a member and got howled down, being told that 70% of photographers at (I think) the Olympics used Canon. So what? They would have been using top of the range models with lens costing £2K+ - and I'm certainly never paying that kind of money for glass
Comment by cliff_occo posted on *ist DS Test in AP at 22/02/2005 - 13:43
Cliff
Comment by cliff_occo posted on Digital Camera Utility at 16/02/2005 - 19:58
I would like to go on using the Centon (a hammerhead gun, and quite powerful). Has anyone else had any experience, or able to offer advice?
Comment by cliff_occo posted on Flash Compatibility (Again!) at 22/02/2005 - 13:54
Comment by cliff_occo posted on *ist DS software at 20/01/2005 - 19:52
Has anyone else come across this problem with the software?
I am running a 4 month old computer, with 1024mb of RAM, Windows XP + SP2, and an Athlone 64 3400+ processor
Comment by cliff_occo posted on *ist DS software at 20/01/2005 - 10:18

