Clarky

Joined: 19th July 2007

All Forum Comments

Topics Created Topics Contributed Forum Comments Photo Comments

All Forum Comments

Clarky
Thanks for clearing that up Tony i had wondered about these Sigma's myself when i have seen them listed but was never in the market for one so i never asked Thanks anyway

Comment by Clarky posted on Sigma lenses qwezzie at 06/11/2007 - 17:28

Clarky
And my comment did'nt help so i retract it.
But in Mannest'y defence i did'nt know what WTB meant either

Comment by Clarky posted on FOUND 50-135MM pentax at 06/11/2007 - 16:24

Clarky
Quote:
No need to post in code, if you want people to understand it that is. What on earth is [WTB] supposed to mean to the rest of us on this planet?
Want The Ba****d

Comment by Clarky posted on FOUND 50-135MM pentax at 06/11/2007 - 14:25

Clarky
Quote:
I lost my glasses. Anybody saw them?
Ther on your head Dirk

Comment by Clarky posted on Discussion: Weekly Competition No 18 “Shadows” at 09/11/2007 - 04:04

Clarky
Well done JR And Well judged again Karma I like your judging style and to go too the trouble of editing some of the entries as you like to see them is a nice touch.
I agree i should have cropped the grass out but i lost focus on the grass (foreground) and was more pre-occupied with what to do with the sky so it was over looked.

Comment by Clarky posted on Weekly Competition No. 18 "Shadows" at 12/11/2007 - 09:55

Clarky
At the beach

Comment Image

Comment by Clarky posted on Weekly Competition No. 18 "Shadows" at 09/11/2007 - 01:53

Clarky
Quote:
I was quite happy with it other than the size and the fact that like most independant lenses, it focuses the "wrong" way for Pentax. The only reason I sold it was that I wasn't using it that much and the 200/2.5 or the 200/2.8 A* on the A 2X-S covertor did the same job. I certainly preferred it to the lighter weight offerings that came after. Check my post above. The link there will take you to some of the wildlife shots I used it for in the Falklands.

Kim
Aaaah i looked at the link you posted and i was looking for a review or something about the lens. Didn't realise it was pics you wanted me to look at

Comment by Clarky posted on Pentax SMC 400mm f5.6 at 06/11/2007 - 16:36

Clarky
I was scratching my head when i read that. I would'nt have thought the filter thread would stand up to that kind of punishment.

So what did you think of the vivitar lens do you recommend it.
I want a long prime but i don't want to pay a lot of money for it as i won't get that much use out of it. But i don't want a dog either (gee i am easy to please )

Comment by Clarky posted on Pentax SMC 400mm f5.6 at 06/11/2007 - 15:29

Clarky
Quote:
I used to have the Vivitar 400/5.6 which was a similar size and it was a monster. It came out shortly before the more compact 72mm filter versions from Tokina, Sigma and Tamron. Whilst it gave impressive results, it just never got used that much because of it's bulk.

Kim
Was this the one :

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=160175295115&ssPageName=STRK:MEWA:IT&ih=006

Comment by Clarky posted on Pentax SMC 400mm f5.6 at 06/11/2007 - 01:04

Clarky
Hmmm i am starting to have second thoughts on this lens. Its a monster alright. Thanks anyway guys. Its not on my list of priorities so i may wait.

Comment by Clarky posted on Pentax SMC 400mm f5.6 at 05/11/2007 - 16:52

Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo