This one is purely for demonstration purposes as I think it lacks any artistic appeal at all. Having said that I know quite a few from the sequences I post do lack any artistic appeal but I just find it a lot of fun doing it.

You will notice on these ones the shapes of the bowl and amount of liquid is different and the effect is totally different from the crown one. It tends to rise in a column rather than splash into a crown shape. Then from here you just time it accordingly. You can see the effect on the little droplet on a very particular timing on this one also

Same principle applies to the crown effect shapes, just timing it fraction quicker or slower gets the shape variations from the main ones.

As long as you find the basic principles and apply the variables for the main shapes then you just work around it.

Mike

This one for example is part of the sequence that is very close in fraction of seconds apart from the No6.

Once you capture a particular shape then you just work around releasing the shutter/flash very nearer to that timing spot so you can get the shapes around that. You can notice that this one I snapped just a fraction of a second earlier than I was doing when I captured the No6. On this one the long droplet had just achieved its maximum height and was about to start receeding. Once I got one of these then I can try to time it up more or less and get the shapes related to that sequence.

Its never going to be spot on each time you snap them but definitely you increase your chances of capturing them by calculations of this sort.

Hi Mike

A few things determine the shape and height of the droplet reflections. Height from which it is dropped, the size of the droplets (the diameter of the opening from where it falls off), the shape of the container where the liquid falls into including the amount of liquid in the container itself. Some other more variable exists such as the density of the liquid itself but leaving those smaller details mainly if you concentrate just on the height from where they drop and the amount of liquid in the container you can more or less obtain the shapes you want with a certain degree of accuracy. It won't be of course hundred percent but definitely a fairly good chance of obtaining the shapes and then with practice you learn to fire the shutter/flash at the precise time when you want the shape captured.

With practise it does become fairly easy I must say.

But I am still battling with a few problems as I would like to improve these shots further. I personally feel that I haven't even hit the half way mark, hence the frustrations at times when I am on it

Karl, Not sure what phalic means, but if you mean phallic then my reply to your question is "no" but I have to say that however I try to visualise that image I still fail to see any phallic shape in it. At least on that particular one. So I am a bit surprised how you see a phallic shape in that.

But hey, what do I know? I am just a simple guy who loves to lock myself in the shed and just snap some wine glasses and water drop images , particularly when I am stressed so I might lack any vision or any sense of fertile imagination similar to yours.

Chopped it off Martin

Nothing works best as a simple and drastic solution

This is all result of empty wine glasses in the shed, you see? Reflections from corners, unlevelled camera on a tripod . Got to keep those glasses hidden so I can't reach them easily

Martin, now that you mention I notice it yes, and wine glasses are to blame quite literally in fact . I forgot to check my camera level on the tripod .

Oh now I know what Stefan means , learning everyday I am

5-

4-