All Forum Comments

Comment by aminstar posted on colour or B&W at 21/04/2009 - 14:45
Have you tried using one of the artistic filters in photoshop ie watercolour or dry brush?
no I haven't tried anything such as that, not yet. I have just been using the basic sharpening tools and the curves. Still a lot to explore , I will give it a go and check it
Comment by aminstar posted on colour or B&W at 21/04/2009 - 14:41
number 2 for me amin .I think being in mono gives it more texture remind me of a tin of hamerite paint
Comment by aminstar posted on colour or B&W at 21/04/2009 - 07:29
All are fantastic and excellently cropped and all have their own uniqueness.
Althogh the B&W one doesn't have the same oomph as the other 2, it doesn't mean that it doesn't work.
I'll PM you tomorrow morning
Paul
no desperate hurry, when you are free and comfortable with time you can deal with it.
thanks
Comment by aminstar posted on colour or B&W at 20/04/2009 - 23:25
I have been trying some new ideas with the soap and bubble series of the images I have been taking.
Would like your opinion comments and critiques on this B&W compared to the coloured ones. If its something that looks good I might try giving a shot to some that might end up looking better in B&W.
I cannot control totally the patterns or colours, only partially, but can certainly make them either more concentrated in patterns and colours like the B&W image, or put more emphasis on wider patterns, or oblongs etc. I think the wider and smoother patterns do look good in colour so I am not sure about B&W and if any looks good at all.
There is a possibility of creating a certain different pattern like the bottom one, but I would like your views and opinion please.
Tnank you



Comment by aminstar posted on colour or B&W at 20/04/2009 - 18:51
Can you tell us how you took the shot?
I am still learning to prepare the mixtures and getting the sizes of the films in order to get the best patterns , its still a learning process.
Just like the smoke images I have had some pretty frustrating days when I just couldn't get anything out of it except a messy shed and a slippery floor but then slowly I manage to get bits and pieces out. My first images I had to crop it heavily to remove the bad bits.
Still not the way I would like but definitely seems that there has been some improvements.
The help I get from the people here feeding me technical help and also including software stuff like you just see on the thread has helped me a lot.
Full credit to them really who have helped me a lot in achieving some nice results
Comment by aminstar posted on Red areas in RAW images at 20/04/2009 - 15:48
@amin, I really like this shot.
Comment by aminstar posted on Red areas in RAW images at 20/04/2009 - 15:41
Had a go at SPDS and seems pretty good at higher ISO.
This one was shot at ISO 3200 and seems to have done a pretty good job of it.
My bubble series increasing now. Managed to find ways of getting the whole image into focusing but at the expense of higher ISO, at least so far . But on the other hand got the image just like I wanted, well except it would be perfect without the noise of course. The JPG file came to 17MB , as I hardly had to crop it. Managed to keep the frame at 3872 X 2592 ) so the print quality remains intact . This one I shrank to upload here to 800 X 600

Comment by aminstar posted on Red areas in RAW images at 20/04/2009 - 15:22
Amin,
SPDS = Silkypix Developer Studio.
I also have NeatImage as well (but this only gets used if I have older JPG-only images).
SPDS+K20D+ISO3200 is pretty decent
LR+K20D+ISO3200 looks pretty "yuck" and takes a lot of work to look right.
SPDS isn't everyone's cup of tea (the UI and manual are very "Japlish"), but the IQ is superb. Personally I'd like the UI and luminance controls of LR with the demoasic/noise engine of SPDS, and the background processing ability of Capture One this I definitely can't wait to have a go at it. Would be nice to be able to tweak the background as I notice how much more enhanced the images look. So, do you isolate the BG and then tweak it? hmm I will go and check Capture one then. Hope there is a trial version for dl
thanks )))
Amin
Matt
So let me see, hmm Got LR so its just starting to use it, I like the UI but have used it only to organise images, and compare, but now even for comparision I use FastStone, its pretty simple and neat. But now you are talking SPDS+K20+ISO3200 this is getting me all excited hehehe.
Ahn, and the magic word background processing ability
Comment by aminstar posted on Red areas in RAW images at 20/04/2009 - 12:10
Amin,
Normally I use Silkypix and then final edit in Photoshop. SPDS does most of what I need anyway (noise reduction, sharpening, colour adjustment, curves adjustment, lens aberration, barrel/pincushion adjustment, etc).
However, I also really like Lightroom - at least the interface. SPDS gives MUCH better noise reduction and control, but I find the luminance adjustments of LR easier to get results.
Matt
I use Ninja for noise reduction. I find it straightforward with the pentax profiles uploaded. But I think I would like to give a try to Silkipix thats what you are calling SPDS right? still not familiar with abbreviations, but getting there lol. There was a time I didn't even know what ss or stopping was and thanks to you all I am getting into the ideas of abbreviations :0
Comment by aminstar posted on Red areas in RAW images at 20/04/2009 - 11:55

