Fly of some sort

by paullucas

Oh I wish I knew what this fly is.
TonyM exhibited his fly yesterday and it was the same as this. I cheekily asked what the name of the fly was but no-one knew.
I shall call him "Harold"

Paul

Lens: Sigma 105mm EX Macro
Uploaded27/05/2009 - 12:34
CategoryWildlife / Nature
Shutter Speed1/90
Aperturef/9.5
LensN/A
ISO800
Focal Length105mm
Unique Views / Likes0/0

Jacko
Posted 27/05/2009 - 12:50 Link
This looks like a Cluster fly,(Pollenia rudis), part of the Calliphordiae
family. Nice shot with good detail.





Jacko. Optio 555.
roy1234
Posted 27/05/2009 - 12:58 Link
Nice macro of a fly Paul but a bit curious of the set up, the fly don't seem to have its legs resting on anywhere and the rear leg, instead of the sticky pad resting on the leaf, looks as though it is broken upward. has it been injured? looks like "Harold" has a wound under the wing.
TonyM
Posted 27/05/2009 - 13:05 Link
Very nice Paul - I'll name mine Ian, although he's probably a gonner by now. Your shot is much sharper, although we used the same lens. My problem was that the bugger was up at the top of the mirror in the bathroom, so no chance of tripod/monopod and I had to lean over. Did you use tripod? And how do you find the Sigma? I've been very pleased!
paullucas
Posted 27/05/2009 - 13:55 Link
Jacko wrote:
This looks like a Cluster fly,(Pollenia rudis), part of the Calliphordiae family. Nice shot with good detail.
Ah I knew someone would be able to tell me, thanks Jacko


roy1234 wrote:
Nice macro of a fly Paul but a bit curious of the set up, the fly don't seem to have its legs resting on anywhere and the rear leg, instead of the sticky pad resting on the leaf, looks as though it is broken upward. has it been injured? looks like "Harold" has a wound under the wing.
What you see here is how the shot was taken, his legs were hanging off the leaf. I assure you that he is as natural as natural can be. I didn't superglue him to the leaf, no need to, he was a little poser. I see what you mean about the wound, didn't really notice that until now. All I did to the shot was get rid of some noise in CS3 and crop it to 12"x12"

TonyM wrote:
Very nice Paul - I'll name mine Ian, although he's probably a gonner by now. Your shot is much sharper, although we used the same lens. My problem was that the bugger was up at the top of the mirror in the bathroom, so no chance of tripod/monopod and I had to lean over. Did you use tripod? And how do you find the Sigma? I've been very pleased!
Yes I used a tripod, Manfrotto 055ProB, this is an outstanding tripod as the positions that it can get into are amazing.
I love the lens, it is one of my favourites, all the shots in my portfolio apart from the Puffin and squiggle are taken with the Sigma. I had a nightmare with it when I first bought it a couple of years ago, images were to dark and the slightest movement made the images blurred and orrible. The Hoverfly in my portfolio was taken handheld.
Yes a great macro lens indeed.


Paul
Edited by paullucas: 27/05/2009 - 13:57
scottthehat
Posted 27/05/2009 - 13:56 Link
wow paul truely stunning shot and detail,
just keep snapping,

https://pentaxphotogallery.com/scottbenson


http://s727.photobucket.com/albums/ww272/scottthehat/


CAMERAS = k200d + battery grip.
nikon d300 + battery grip.
LENSES = tamron aspherical DII 18-200mm f3.5/6.3,
nikon 18-200mm afs vr f3.5/5.6 g dx
sigma 150-500mm apo dg hsm os
sigma 170-500mm apo dg
FLASH = samsung sef36pzf flash + more.
Greytop
Posted 27/05/2009 - 14:22 Link
Stunning shot Paul, excellent
Regards Huw

flickr
Cliff-P
Posted 27/05/2009 - 14:23 Link
Top shot Paul, superb detail well taken
Cliff.




My Flickr link
Nikon D750, D7000 , Nikkor 80-400, 70-300 and 18-200 lenses
paulyrichard
Posted 27/05/2009 - 15:03 Link
Excellent Paul, unusual colours on this one.
"All the technique in the world doesn’t compensate for the inability to notice." - Elliott Erwitt

http://paulyrichard.wordpress.com/
roy1234
Posted 27/05/2009 - 18:08 Link
Sorry if i gave you the wrong impression Paul...was just wondering if it had hit a window or something...i have no doubt that the shot is natural.
just that it looks a bit bedraggled thats all.
Rees
Posted 27/05/2009 - 18:36 Link
Hand held! you must have been having lessons off scottthehat - what about McFly for a name?
Jokes aside, this is a superb capture, the definition is spot on and the framing/composition speaks for itself - still hard to believe its hand held, its so just in focus - well taken.
Not everything in life is Black & White, If only it were!
Kind Regards,
Rees
paullucas
Posted 27/05/2009 - 19:50 Link
roy1234 wrote:
Sorry if i gave you the wrong impression Paul...was just wondering if it had hit a window or something...i have no doubt that the shot is natural.
just that it looks a bit bedraggled thats all.
No offense meant to your comment, Harold does indeed look like he has been through the wars!

Rees wrote:
Hand held! you must have been having lessons off scottthehat - what about McFly for a name?
Jokes aside, this is a superb capture, the definition is spot on and the framing/composition speaks for itself - still hard to believe its hand held, its so just in focus - well taken.
Harold was not taken handheld, believe me I do not have the hands of Scott. The handheld shot was the Hoverfly im my portfolio, I had no time to muck around with a tripod, it was a case of fingers crossed and hope for the best.

Paul
aminstar
Posted 02/06/2009 - 10:46 Link
WOW, Paul
you are starting to amaze me now immensely with these lovely insec shots.
This is one heck of a shot

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo