Wtb A Tele-converter for Da* 300
Posted 06/06/2013 - 12:42
Link
Personally, I wouldn't bother Derek. I've got the DA*300 and acquired the 1.7x TC (not the pentax one admittedly) that most people recommend - but the quality doesn't really surpass that which can be obtained from a crop of the basic lens.
But then....maybe someone knows different!
But then....maybe someone knows different!
Posted 06/06/2013 - 13:25
Link
MartynUK wrote:
Personally, I wouldn't bother Derek. I've got the DA*300 and acquired the 1.7x TC (not the pentax one admittedly) that most people recommend - but the quality doesn't really surpass that which can be obtained from a crop of the basic lens.
But then....maybe someone knows different!
The gannets in this thread were taken with the DA*300 and Pentax 1.7xTC. While the Razorbills were without the TCPersonally, I wouldn't bother Derek. I've got the DA*300 and acquired the 1.7x TC (not the pentax one admittedly) that most people recommend - but the quality doesn't really surpass that which can be obtained from a crop of the basic lens.
But then....maybe someone knows different!
For info, the Fulmar was with the Sigma 150-500
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/a-selection-from-bempton-cliffs-41670
Posted 06/06/2013 - 13:35
Link
Blythman wrote:
For info, the Fulmar was with the Sigma 150-500
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/a-selection-from-bempton-cliffs-41670
There doesn't seem much wrong with the 1.7x from those piccies Alan. In fact, not that anything definitive can be said from random examples, but there is something about rendition of those gannet shots with the 300/1.7x that is more pleasing to my eyes than either the Sigma or the 300 on its own - which doesn't make sens, but its my eyes MartynUK wrote:
Personally, I wouldn't bother Derek. I've got the DA*300 and acquired the 1.7x TC (not the pentax one admittedly) that most people recommend - but the quality doesn't really surpass that which can be obtained from a crop of the basic lens.
But then....maybe someone knows different!
The gannets in this thread were taken with the DA*300 and Pentax 1.7xTC. While the Razorbills were without the TCPersonally, I wouldn't bother Derek. I've got the DA*300 and acquired the 1.7x TC (not the pentax one admittedly) that most people recommend - but the quality doesn't really surpass that which can be obtained from a crop of the basic lens.
But then....maybe someone knows different!
For info, the Fulmar was with the Sigma 150-500
https://www.pentaxuser.com/forum/topic/a-selection-from-bempton-cliffs-41670
Great shots as well.
Posted 06/06/2013 - 14:07
Link
The Tamron 1.4X Pz-AF MC4 is quite highly regarded, link but is no longer in production and it's difficult to find one nowadays. I managed to get hold of one, and am not planning to let it go.
It does autofocus quite well on the DA* 300 - not as easily as it does without the teleconverter fitted, but still quite acceptably. I find there is no noticable loss of image quality.
I would say that if you regularly want the extra range then you might be better just getting a longer lens, but for infrequent/occasional use and travelling light then this TC is more than up to the job.
It does autofocus quite well on the DA* 300 - not as easily as it does without the teleconverter fitted, but still quite acceptably. I find there is no noticable loss of image quality.
I would say that if you regularly want the extra range then you might be better just getting a longer lens, but for infrequent/occasional use and travelling light then this TC is more than up to the job.
Posted 06/06/2013 - 14:08
Link
Hi Derek , you have a pm.
Regards Steve
Regards Steve
Posted 06/06/2013 - 15:54
Link
Thanks for the info folks. All help greatly appreciated.
I know what i like, If not always why.
Posted 06/06/2013 - 17:05
Link
Pm replied to Steve.
Cheers
Derek
Cheers
Derek
I know what i like, If not always why.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


2322 posts
13 years
Wicklow Ireland
If anyone has one that works with this lens. Im looking for something that wont affect the i/q too adversely. Which one is the best to look for.
derek