wide angle lens advice required

adwb
Posted 30/04/2010 - 18:54 Link
The "widest" lens I have is a 18-55 and I am wondering what else is available from the older "a" or "m" series lenses that is wider than 18mm?
All I seem to find on sale sites as wide angles are 28 mm which does not help i assume.
Is it worth spending money on a good quality [I hope]Raynox wide angle to increase the field of view? I don't want a fisheye as that effect is not what I want at all.
I am trying more to attempt more landscapes with a decent field of view with out resorting to a couple of images stitched together.
Alistair
Assorted Pentax bodies and lenses as well as Sony and Olympus kit
pschlute
Posted 30/04/2010 - 19:17 Link
Wider than 18, non-fisheye, Pentax produced a 15mm 3.5 in the "K" and A series.

However these are rare beasts and you will have to pay more than a new DA15mm to own one ! Add to that the problem with flare you might encounter, I would suggest "old" is not better in this case.

You will do better to try and find a DA15mm or DA14mm. They will be better performers on a digital sensor.
K10D
Posted 30/04/2010 - 19:34 Link
The full benefit of the K/A series 15mm is wasted on the cropped sensor, as is the 28mm Shift lens.

So probably better with a newer model lens.

Regards
Too far from a shore.
Edited by K10D: 30/04/2010 - 19:39
Dangermouse
Posted 30/04/2010 - 19:38 Link
There was a K 17mm f4 fisheye too. Currently one is up for grabs on ebay, although it won't go cheap and has a reserve on it.
Matt

Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
K10D
Posted 30/04/2010 - 19:46 Link
Taken with an istD and the 17mm FE.

Zallaq beach, Bahrain.

Comment Image


Regards
Too far from a shore.
axl
Posted 30/04/2010 - 20:22 Link
How does the FOV of the 17mm FE compare to the rectalinear lens?
the 17mm FE on APSC = ....mm rectalinear on APSC???
my PBase --- PPG
K-7 + O-ME53, K-x blue, AF280T, AF240Z, AF160SA
SMC: FA*24 - FA31ltd - DA*55 - FA100/2.8
K10D
Posted 30/04/2010 - 20:26 Link
I'll shoot both, tomorrow on a K7 and post images. Same aperture and shutter speed. Haven't used the 15mm for some time.

Regards
Too far from a shore.
Edited by K10D: 30/04/2010 - 20:26
womble
Posted 01/05/2010 - 00:57 Link
Here is a shot taken using the K 15mm. I took this for the "evolution" competition but went with a different photo in the end. I have left it uncropped for comparative purposes. It isn't as sharp as the DA12-24mm lens but I cannot use the latter on my film bodies.

Best wishes, Kris.

Comment Image
nurkuti
Posted 01/05/2010 - 11:44 Link
I do not like fish eye. In my opinion nothing beats Sigma 10-20 for regular wide angle.
K10D
Posted 01/05/2010 - 12:34 Link
K10D wrote:
I'll shoot both, tomorrow on a K7 and post images. Same aperture and shutter speed. Haven't used the 15mm for some time.

Regards
OK, two quick shots.

K7 set at ISO 100 and 1/60th sec. Manual.

Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Comment Image


Both lenses were set at f/8. Central focus point used until beep heard. Shutter cable released. Only adjustments (levels-minor black adjustment and sharpened to 100% @ 0.3). No colour adjustments.

Regards
Too far from a shore.
MrCynical
Posted 03/05/2010 - 01:02 Link
The other point is that fisheyes designed for 35mm (ie all of them except the Pentax DA 10-17) will not give quite as dramatic a 'fisheye effect' since only the center, less distorted, part of the image circle is captured by APS-C DSLRs.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo