Why do some lenses have front/back focus issues?
Posted 15/04/2011 - 01:38
Link
As in all manufacturing processes, nothing is absolutely perfect. All manufacturers set tolerances for the goods they manufacture. If you buy something with all the tolerances to their minimum, you get an outstanding thing. On the other hand, if you have all the tolerances at their maximum, you have a lemon. And there is everything in between...
So, if you get a lens with some front or back focusing, count your blessing, it can be fixed easily.
So many things can go wrong in manufacturing fine precision equipment, it's still amazing lens manufacturers give such high quality material.
So, if you get a lens with some front or back focusing, count your blessing, it can be fixed easily.
So many things can go wrong in manufacturing fine precision equipment, it's still amazing lens manufacturers give such high quality material.
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Posted 15/04/2011 - 11:24
Link
but if it's out of focus at the Main sensor, then the info at the Focus sensor should also be out and an adjustment made !? as both light sources come through the same lens ?? is this not so ? I'm confused with this too !
links to more info required please
links to more info required please
K-7 | K10 | DA 18-135 | DA 18-250 | DA 55-300 | DFA 100 |
Posted 15/04/2011 - 12:03
Link
I agree. For normal "closed loop" control, the camera would adjust the lens until it was in focus. Hence the only calibration would be that the focus sensor and the actual photographic sensor were the same distance optically.
However, my logic tells me the fact that one has some lenses front focusing and some back, means the focus system does not work this way. Indeed, there needs to be some "feed forward" system to speed up the focus algorithm. A standard PID controller would be too slow.
What is missing from my understanding is exactly how they manage the focus algorithm. Perhaps this is a closely guarded secret. Do you want quick focusing or accurate focusing? (I could cynically say Pentax has neither, but fear the flames!)
However, my logic tells me the fact that one has some lenses front focusing and some back, means the focus system does not work this way. Indeed, there needs to be some "feed forward" system to speed up the focus algorithm. A standard PID controller would be too slow.
What is missing from my understanding is exactly how they manage the focus algorithm. Perhaps this is a closely guarded secret. Do you want quick focusing or accurate focusing? (I could cynically say Pentax has neither, but fear the flames!)
Posted 15/04/2011 - 12:23
Link
timd wrote:
I agree. For normal "closed loop" control, the camera would adjust the lens until it was in focus. Hence the only calibration would be that the focus sensor and the actual photographic sensor were the same distance optically.
However, my logic tells me the fact that one has some lenses front focusing and some back, means the focus system does not work this way. Indeed, there needs to be some "feed forward" system to speed up the focus algorithm. A standard PID controller would be too slow.
What is missing from my understanding is exactly how they manage the focus algorithm. Perhaps this is a closely guarded secret. Do you want quick focusing or accurate focusing? (I could cynically say Pentax has neither, but fear the flames!)
Er - really?
I agree. For normal "closed loop" control, the camera would adjust the lens until it was in focus. Hence the only calibration would be that the focus sensor and the actual photographic sensor were the same distance optically.
However, my logic tells me the fact that one has some lenses front focusing and some back, means the focus system does not work this way. Indeed, there needs to be some "feed forward" system to speed up the focus algorithm. A standard PID controller would be too slow.
What is missing from my understanding is exactly how they manage the focus algorithm. Perhaps this is a closely guarded secret. Do you want quick focusing or accurate focusing? (I could cynically say Pentax has neither, but fear the flames!)
Posted 15/04/2011 - 15:42
Link
Cisco wrote:
but if it's out of focus at the Main sensor, then the info at the Focus sensor should also be out and an adjustment made
The focus sensor is located below the mirror box, and the light is reflected to the focus sensor trough a secondary mirror located behind the main mirror. If any of these components are out of adjustment, the focus sensor won't "see" exactly what the sensor "sees".
but if it's out of focus at the Main sensor, then the info at the Focus sensor should also be out and an adjustment made
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Posted 15/04/2011 - 15:45
Link
timd wrote:
(I could cynically say Pentax has neither, but fear the flames!)
When it comes to focus accuracy, Pentax is not worst than the "others". Actually, Canon should have taken lessons from Pentax when they did the AF on the EOS 1D Mk III. For a "pro" camera, that one was highly inaccurate.(I could cynically say Pentax has neither, but fear the flames!)
edit.: Just noticed this is my thousandth post. If I keep on going, I might catch up with Stephan in about a thousand years.
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Posted 15/04/2011 - 15:46
Link
But ALL those components are in the Camera body !! So how can the lens make any difference ?? It will be the same error for ALL lenses ?? No ?
K-7 | K10 | DA 18-135 | DA 18-250 | DA 55-300 | DFA 100 |
Posted 15/04/2011 - 15:52
Link
Cisco wrote:
But ALL those components are in the Camera body !! So how can the lens make any difference ?? It will be the same error for ALL lenses ?? No ?
Lenses also suffer from manufacturing variations. The focus sensor might not see the light exactly as the image sensor does. Add to that the color fringing of some lens, diffraction and reflections, color temperature, and you have quite a few things that can confuse the AF sensor.But ALL those components are in the Camera body !! So how can the lens make any difference ?? It will be the same error for ALL lenses ?? No ?
I personally think the success rate of the AF system on most cameras is very good, given all the variables.
Yves (another one of those crazy Canucks)
Posted 15/04/2011 - 17:07
Link
Just found this, I think it answers the question
AF cameras don't "keep adjusting" - they take one measurement of how far apart the images on the line sensors are, calculate how far the lens needs to shift, then shift that far. They don't then check to see if the image is in focus.
That makes it quite clear and explains why we need to adjust focus on a per lens basis
Tks for help !
AF cameras don't "keep adjusting" - they take one measurement of how far apart the images on the line sensors are, calculate how far the lens needs to shift, then shift that far. They don't then check to see if the image is in focus.
That makes it quite clear and explains why we need to adjust focus on a per lens basis
Tks for help !
K-7 | K10 | DA 18-135 | DA 18-250 | DA 55-300 | DFA 100 |
Posted 15/04/2011 - 17:35
Link
Cisco wrote:
Just found this, I think it answers the question
AF cameras don't "keep adjusting" - they take one measurement of how far apart the images on the line sensors are, calculate how far the lens needs to shift, then shift that far. They don't then check to see if the image is in focus.
That makes it quite clear and explains why we need to adjust focus on a per lens basis
Tks for help !
Don't know where you got that (dis)information from but it's complete nonsense.
Just found this, I think it answers the question
AF cameras don't "keep adjusting" - they take one measurement of how far apart the images on the line sensors are, calculate how far the lens needs to shift, then shift that far. They don't then check to see if the image is in focus.
That makes it quite clear and explains why we need to adjust focus on a per lens basis
Tks for help !
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 15/04/2011 - 17:42
Link
So-called experts on the web !
Several times from different people !?
Explanation ?? or links ??
Several times from different people !?
Explanation ?? or links ??
K-7 | K10 | DA 18-135 | DA 18-250 | DA 55-300 | DFA 100 |
Posted 15/04/2011 - 17:56
Link
Two seperate logical fallacies back to back ...
Further the contrast AF system has to hunt as it doesn't know in which direction the subject is initially out of focus so by definition it takes a guess and then refines from there.
Cisco wrote:
So-called experts on the web !
Appeal to AuthoritySo-called experts on the web !
Quote:
Several times from different people !?
Appeal to PopularitySeveral times from different people !?
Quote:
Explanation ?? or links ??
Well I know from actually using a K10D, K20D and 3 K-5s that it is nonsense as they all take more than one attempt if the first one doesn't achieve it. And that's with the regular phase AF system.Explanation ?? or links ??
Further the contrast AF system has to hunt as it doesn't know in which direction the subject is initially out of focus so by definition it takes a guess and then refines from there.
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 15/04/2011 - 18:35
Link
Then why do we have a FF/BF problem ?? if it thinks it HAS achieved it ?
You still haven't explained how the system works, or provided links to justify your rash statements !?
You still haven't explained how the system works, or provided links to justify your rash statements !?
K-7 | K10 | DA 18-135 | DA 18-250 | DA 55-300 | DFA 100 |
Posted 15/04/2011 - 19:56
Link
Bit of a tangent, but when using the focus chart, I had to dial in +12 to get the desired result, but ...
After spending hours doing the above, trying a "real" image on a stationary object, I changed this back down to +4
Are they really front and back focusing or is it our perception more than anything ?
After spending hours doing the above, trying a "real" image on a stationary object, I changed this back down to +4
Are they really front and back focusing or is it our perception more than anything ?
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


519 posts
15 years
West Country
From what I understand about the AF system, it adjusts the focus to make the image at the AF focus sensors in focus.
This being the case, I can't quite get my head around why, for some lenses, the AF sensors register correct focus but the image projected on the sensor is consistently slightly front or back focussed. Does anybody know why this happens?