which convertors?
Posted 28/02/2016 - 17:37
Link
Geordie
I think we are talking somewhat at cross-purposes - what I was trying to say was that whilst the Pz version of the 1.4x Kenko does work with SDM (etc.) the Pz version of the 2X Kenko does not appear to from the reports I read, although I have never had one (and would probably never buy one as my experience with several 2X T/Cs was less than stellar - even Sigma's own one used on their lenses!).
I did not mean to imply that the Kenko 1.5X won't work - and, OTOH, the US reviews rated the 1.4X slightly better than the 1.5X.
I think we are talking somewhat at cross-purposes - what I was trying to say was that whilst the Pz version of the 1.4x Kenko does work with SDM (etc.) the Pz version of the 2X Kenko does not appear to from the reports I read, although I have never had one (and would probably never buy one as my experience with several 2X T/Cs was less than stellar - even Sigma's own one used on their lenses!).
I did not mean to imply that the Kenko 1.5X won't work - and, OTOH, the US reviews rated the 1.4X slightly better than the 1.5X.
K-3 II, K-3 and a K-70 from SRS (having now relegated the K-30 /"K-50" to a backup body), & some Sigma and Pentax lenses (and a lot of old 35mm gear!)
Posted 29/02/2016 - 09:31
Link
Posted 29/02/2016 - 11:23
Link
Geordie
IIRC it's not just the number of contacts but also about the internal circuitry inside, and that the 2.0X is different to the 1.4X!
IIRC it's not just the number of contacts but also about the internal circuitry inside, and that the 2.0X is different to the 1.4X!
K-3 II, K-3 and a K-70 from SRS (having now relegated the K-30 /"K-50" to a backup body), & some Sigma and Pentax lenses (and a lot of old 35mm gear!)
Posted 29/02/2016 - 11:34
Link
jeallen01 wrote:
Geordie
IIRC it's not just the number of contacts but also about the internal circuitry inside, and that the 2.0X is different to the 1.4X!
Sorry John, Bruce asked for a photo of the converter contacts this is what I have posted, once again it is a 1.5X not a 1,4 or 2X
Geordie
IIRC it's not just the number of contacts but also about the internal circuitry inside, and that the 2.0X is different to the 1.4X!
Posted 29/02/2016 - 11:45
Link
Hi Geordie thanks for pisting.
I have went for the one from SRS X2 pz convertor called them up and they say AF etc works.
Years guarantee as well.
I have went for the one from SRS X2 pz convertor called them up and they say AF etc works.
Years guarantee as well.
Cheers,
Bruce
Bruce
Posted 29/02/2016 - 11:53
Link
The Kenko 1,5x Teleplus MC DG is a very poor TC.
The Kenko 1,4x MC4 DGX (non-SMC) is actually one of the best you can buy. I'm not sure if the current model is identical.
SEE:
http://www.traumflieger.de/objektivtest/open_test/telekonverter/overview.php
I can't read German but Bruce might be able to translate any interesting points.
Zentrum = centre. What does erw. zentrum mean ?
Rand = edge
Note all 2x are poor. Most 1.7x are good from my experience.
--
The Kenko 1,4x MC4 DGX (non-SMC) is actually one of the best you can buy. I'm not sure if the current model is identical.
SEE:
http://www.traumflieger.de/objektivtest/open_test/telekonverter/overview.php
I can't read German but Bruce might be able to translate any interesting points.
Zentrum = centre. What does erw. zentrum mean ?
Rand = edge
Note all 2x are poor. Most 1.7x are good from my experience.
--
Half Man... Half Pentax ... Half Cucumber
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Pentax K-1 + K-5 and some other stuff
Algi
Posted 29/02/2016 - 13:27
Link
I bought a Vivitar MC 2x PK-A/R-PK converter a while ago but it hasn't been used much as none of the auto functions worked despite being in pristine condition and having the contacts. Spurred by your thread I found the solution online, which is to scrape off some black coating where the 7th contact from the camera touches, as per the pencil tip in this photo:
Now the auto aperture functions work fine, it just needs manual focusing and input for shake reduction. These can be found quite cheaply and of course should be compatible with full frame (which the current 1.4x isn't).

Now the auto aperture functions work fine, it just needs manual focusing and input for shake reduction. These can be found quite cheaply and of course should be compatible with full frame (which the current 1.4x isn't).
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.




1930 posts
17 years
W.London
I don't think anyone knows which converter works with a 'D-FA' 80-320 All I know of is an 'FA' version.
You can't go wrong with the Kenko /Teleplus Pz or non-PZ on any non-SDM/Powerzoom lens.
Therefore, on reflection, I would not want to put a T/C on it anyway..
Also, although my very early non-HD 55-300 is very sharp when used on the K-5 etc., when I tried it with the Kenko 1.4X on the GX10/K10D a few years ago, I was not very impressed with that combo either - but the T/C does seem to work reasonably well with the 18-135, and so I keep it for use with that on holidays when I need to keep the travelling weight down..