What to do.
Posted 17/07/2008 - 00:22
Link
Dtours wrote:
Hi all, got some old Pentax primes,all M's
f3.5 28mm
f1.7 50mm
f3.5 135mm
f4. 200mm
f4 50mm macro
thinking of selling the 28mm & 50mm, would I notice a big difference if I got a couple of A's or should I leave things as they are.
thanks for your time
You don't say what camera you intend using them on. I have some of th eM primes you mention and they are fully manual on my K10D, though the 135mm is a fantastic lens and using the green button at your selected apature does set the shutter speed. A lenses allow for the use of Av mode and does provide lens info for exif data.
Hi all, got some old Pentax primes,all M's
f3.5 28mm
f1.7 50mm
f3.5 135mm
f4. 200mm
f4 50mm macro
thinking of selling the 28mm & 50mm, would I notice a big difference if I got a couple of A's or should I leave things as they are.
thanks for your time
Bodies: K5IIs, K7, MZ5n, LX, MV
Lenses: DA*16-50, DA18-55WR, DA18-135, DAL35, M50 F2, A50 f1.4, FA50 f1.4, DA*50-135, DA55-300, Tamron 70-300, DFA 100 WR Macro, M135 f3.5, Sigma 120-400 APO DG HSM, Tokina 500 f8.0
Flash: Metz 58, Metz 48
Accessories: BG4, Pentax right angle finder, Pentax mirror adaptor lens, O-ME53 Viewfinder Loupe
Auto 110 System: Auto 110, Winder, 18mm, 24mm, 50mm, 70mm, 20-40mm, AF100P, 1.7x telecon
Lenses: DA*16-50, DA18-55WR, DA18-135, DAL35, M50 F2, A50 f1.4, FA50 f1.4, DA*50-135, DA55-300, Tamron 70-300, DFA 100 WR Macro, M135 f3.5, Sigma 120-400 APO DG HSM, Tokina 500 f8.0
Flash: Metz 58, Metz 48
Accessories: BG4, Pentax right angle finder, Pentax mirror adaptor lens, O-ME53 Viewfinder Loupe
Auto 110 System: Auto 110, Winder, 18mm, 24mm, 50mm, 70mm, 20-40mm, AF100P, 1.7x telecon
Posted 17/07/2008 - 00:24
Link
I use them on k100d, but I want to upgrade later in the year.
thanks
thanks
Posted 17/07/2008 - 00:42
Link
Hi Dtours, many of the M and A series lenses were optically identical so you'll notice no difference in image quality (the M's are generally considered to be better built, the A's certainly more convenient when used on a modern body). If you go to the K-mount bible at Bojidar Dimitrov's site you can cross reference optical designs to see if you're getting like-for-like.
Welcome to the forum by the way
Welcome to the forum by the way
Joining the Q
Posted 17/07/2008 - 09:25
Link
The normal 50mm primes are the same design whether they are "A" or "M" so optically it shouldn't make a difference.
There is no "A" 28mm F3.5, this lens is often regarded as ultra sharp but I found it hard to focus.
There is no "A" 135mm F3.5, this is a very good lens and the "A" 135mm F2.8 is supposed to be garbage, one of the worst Pentax ever made so I'd keep the "M".
The 50mm macros are of completely different designs. personally I'd go for the "A" version as it's F2.8 (easier to focus) and more convenient to use.
The "A" and "M" 200mm lenses are I believe the same, the "M" is certainly a very good lens so the "a" would only be more convenient.
There is no "A" 28mm F3.5, this lens is often regarded as ultra sharp but I found it hard to focus.
There is no "A" 135mm F3.5, this is a very good lens and the "A" 135mm F2.8 is supposed to be garbage, one of the worst Pentax ever made so I'd keep the "M".
The 50mm macros are of completely different designs. personally I'd go for the "A" version as it's F2.8 (easier to focus) and more convenient to use.
The "A" and "M" 200mm lenses are I believe the same, the "M" is certainly a very good lens so the "a" would only be more convenient.
Posted 17/07/2008 - 13:33
Link
Thanks for that guys,I was in two minds what to do, I think I'll keep what I have,
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


3 posts
18 years
f3.5 28mm
f1.7 50mm
f3.5 135mm
f4. 200mm
f4 50mm macro
thinking of selling the 28mm & 50mm, would I notice a big difference if I got a couple of A's or should I leave things as they are.
thanks for your time