What else is a 1.2 for...
1. For that fabulous glow of the roses.
3. An almost abstract great B&W.
Regards
Mike
Be well, stay safe.

The point about "flaws" is interesting. I've never heard an artist say that their paint brush has flaws, they just have a selection of brushes (and other things!) and use the one that has the characteristics they need for the current task.
Steve
The bokeh and rendering at that aperture are really something else.
regards
Karlo

LennyBloke
I don't do a lot of tripod work but I can see that it would have made life easier for many of these shots

And wireless remote view and control could also be useful. Time to get the mobile phone out and load an app?

Steve

Best regards
Inspiration is rarer than a plate glass camera.....
LennyBloke
Member
Worcestershire
these are all with the SMC Pentax K 50mm f1.2 on the K1 MkII (click for a bigger image):
1. Raspberry Ripple Roses
2. Raspberry Shoots
3. Poppy Graveyard
4. Glass Grass (cheated on this one - clarified and it's stopped down slightly!)
When I compare the results from these older class fast lenses against the modern near equivalents the first thing that strikes me is that they are full of flaws. Fringing can be significant, contrast can be low, handling of backlight is not always great - the DFA*50/1.4 is streets ahead on all these fronts and is sharper, but it is these "flaws" that make images like these above. Far from perfect but with a character and charm of their own.
LennyBloke