Weekly Competition #37 Movement
Posted 24/03/2008 - 01:27
Link
Results at end.
Ive been quite harsh and picky in critique
and alot is personal views
but it was very hard to choose, some excellent entries!
Gasman295: I liked this photo, the long exposure has captured the fireworks well and it wasnt too long or short that they are faded or cut off; technically good. However, I think it lacks interest and variety, I feel a wider shot with a foreground element would suit more?
johnriley: The editing you have done, although at first glance I dismissed it, has actually given what wouldve been a static shot movement, a spiral of confusion as the eye darts from one image to another. I'm not sure if I like the addition of the noise though, its taken away detail from the photo I would have liked to have seen. All the same, excellent use of postprocessing.
Daniel Bridge: A very nice clean showing good perspective, and movement of a (very nice) car. The colours compliment each other nicely, but (nitpicky) it wouldve been nicer if the bonnet was sharper. I like the detail retained in the trees though, alot better than just full on motion blur.
Serendipity: I dont feel that the image, although showing the waves follows the movement topic, it feels quite static as I look at it; I think maybe slight blur on the waves would suit more. Also, the sky's highlights are blown, and it seems you have edited something out of the water? A boat?
spirit_of_will: Technically very well captured, retaining sharpness on the subject and slightly panned, very nice. The three coloured floats compliment it nicely, and provide some more interest to the image, though perhaps if it was portrait, showing the blue more, it wouldve worked better? Again, i'm being very nitpicky, its very well captured.
Prieni: I like the diagonal composition, and the black and white looks nice on the rocks, as the ghostly water sweeps up, but perhaps more contrast in the water wouldve been nice.
Bob and his Pentax: The bubbles coming of the back of the penguin really boost this image, but perhaps the white balance could be improved? Also, I realise you were shooting through glass, but focus and IQ isnt the best.
mxuser: nice cat, and nice perspective, but i feel the panning would be better if he was sharp
Dr. Mhuni: Very nice portrait, and the movement shows the girls emotion well, excited, happy, hyper?
Amilner: Interesting photo, taking a different view on the topic. Its a nice composition and I like the symmetry, both arrows, the grass on the left, the shadow on the right.
Justgetoutandride: I like the point of view of this; you got down low and captured a view that wouldnt normally be seen, the movement is portrayed well, and its a nice composition.
Sophie: The movement of the bird is very well shown, highlighted by the outline of the main body of the bird, nice editing. The composition nice, but I wouldve perhaps lightened the sky for more contrast.
Hyram: I love the composition of this, its surreal seeing the balloon being blown to such an extent, and the colours are magnificent.
Malo1961: An interesting image, not often do you see a pan producing a full motion blurred picture, but its worked. It has given the photo a kinda painterly effect, but I like how although the blur is there, I can still tell its of a forest. Lovely colours.
GaryMoffat: Awesome subject matter, what a wave! The coposition is very nice and the muted colours caused by the overcast day really work together with the dirty water. Its hard to pull off interesting shots on overcast days, but you managed very well.
jps: not too sure I like this one, sure its shows movement, but I would never know what it was off, and its quite a random composition the sharper white/blue lines are very nice though.
Belinda B.:A nice shot of a bridge with an interesting wave, I like the depth in the photo alot, but not sure if the editing contributes, though it does give it a slight watercolour look.
Deecy: An interesting street photography shot, however the subject matter isnt too eye catching, the poster behind gives no reference, so I would say a pan on either the guy rushing with his luggage or the man with the coffe cup reading something would have given a nicer shot.
Nimitz: Quite a comical shot, with nice composition, but no real interest for me. Sweet subject matter all the same
Kal 10 d: I like how you have avoided the typical composition for waterfalls and gone up close, the combination of rushing water and sharp splashes is nice, though I mightve chosen a different crop.
namstoop: I love this panning shot, quite odd and surreal, two slightly larger than average men balancing on a small motorbike, and travelling at speed! The colours of the shot really set it off, especially those bright orange gloves. Couldve been a bit sharper on the bodies.
Unlocker: A nice shot of the swan, I can see slight movements in the wings; perhaps a slightly slower shutter speed would exagerate that movement yet keep the body sharp?
promhandicam: Not sure I like this one, lacks contrast and its very hard to tell that its a fisherman, perhaps panning would be better.
Utopia Poppy: I like the composition with the bridge, and the curve of the road adds a nice touch especially with the blur, but with one element sharp (the red car perhaps) the shot would have had more impact
McBrian: "I believe I can fly" eh? Nice shot and good use of equiptment, but you shouldve cropped the left twenty pixels off, and i think if the legs were both down, it wouldve made for a nicer shot. priceless expression
hefty1: interesting subject and nice crop, though a bit sharper and the image wouldve been top class. I realise he was travelling fast though, so that was probably hard to do.
rparmar: awesome spot for a photo, but I personally wouldve cropped out the blown out line top right, and maybe composed the photo more to the right to allow the please drive slowly sign to be more in towards the centre. Nice original idea though.
1st: GaryMoffat with his big splash
2nd: namstoop with his balancing act
3rd: Daniel Bridge with his speeding car
Highly commended (no order): McBrian for his original idea and great use of lighting, Malo1961 for the wonderful colours and technique, johnriley for his interesting editing.
Well done to all, an excellent round!
Ive been quite harsh and picky in critique
and alot is personal views
but it was very hard to choose, some excellent entries!
Gasman295: I liked this photo, the long exposure has captured the fireworks well and it wasnt too long or short that they are faded or cut off; technically good. However, I think it lacks interest and variety, I feel a wider shot with a foreground element would suit more?
johnriley: The editing you have done, although at first glance I dismissed it, has actually given what wouldve been a static shot movement, a spiral of confusion as the eye darts from one image to another. I'm not sure if I like the addition of the noise though, its taken away detail from the photo I would have liked to have seen. All the same, excellent use of postprocessing.
Daniel Bridge: A very nice clean showing good perspective, and movement of a (very nice) car. The colours compliment each other nicely, but (nitpicky) it wouldve been nicer if the bonnet was sharper. I like the detail retained in the trees though, alot better than just full on motion blur.
Serendipity: I dont feel that the image, although showing the waves follows the movement topic, it feels quite static as I look at it; I think maybe slight blur on the waves would suit more. Also, the sky's highlights are blown, and it seems you have edited something out of the water? A boat?
spirit_of_will: Technically very well captured, retaining sharpness on the subject and slightly panned, very nice. The three coloured floats compliment it nicely, and provide some more interest to the image, though perhaps if it was portrait, showing the blue more, it wouldve worked better? Again, i'm being very nitpicky, its very well captured.
Prieni: I like the diagonal composition, and the black and white looks nice on the rocks, as the ghostly water sweeps up, but perhaps more contrast in the water wouldve been nice.
Bob and his Pentax: The bubbles coming of the back of the penguin really boost this image, but perhaps the white balance could be improved? Also, I realise you were shooting through glass, but focus and IQ isnt the best.
mxuser: nice cat, and nice perspective, but i feel the panning would be better if he was sharp
Dr. Mhuni: Very nice portrait, and the movement shows the girls emotion well, excited, happy, hyper?
Amilner: Interesting photo, taking a different view on the topic. Its a nice composition and I like the symmetry, both arrows, the grass on the left, the shadow on the right.
Justgetoutandride: I like the point of view of this; you got down low and captured a view that wouldnt normally be seen, the movement is portrayed well, and its a nice composition.
Sophie: The movement of the bird is very well shown, highlighted by the outline of the main body of the bird, nice editing. The composition nice, but I wouldve perhaps lightened the sky for more contrast.
Hyram: I love the composition of this, its surreal seeing the balloon being blown to such an extent, and the colours are magnificent.
Malo1961: An interesting image, not often do you see a pan producing a full motion blurred picture, but its worked. It has given the photo a kinda painterly effect, but I like how although the blur is there, I can still tell its of a forest. Lovely colours.
GaryMoffat: Awesome subject matter, what a wave! The coposition is very nice and the muted colours caused by the overcast day really work together with the dirty water. Its hard to pull off interesting shots on overcast days, but you managed very well.
jps: not too sure I like this one, sure its shows movement, but I would never know what it was off, and its quite a random composition the sharper white/blue lines are very nice though.
Belinda B.:A nice shot of a bridge with an interesting wave, I like the depth in the photo alot, but not sure if the editing contributes, though it does give it a slight watercolour look.
Deecy: An interesting street photography shot, however the subject matter isnt too eye catching, the poster behind gives no reference, so I would say a pan on either the guy rushing with his luggage or the man with the coffe cup reading something would have given a nicer shot.
Nimitz: Quite a comical shot, with nice composition, but no real interest for me. Sweet subject matter all the same
Kal 10 d: I like how you have avoided the typical composition for waterfalls and gone up close, the combination of rushing water and sharp splashes is nice, though I mightve chosen a different crop.
namstoop: I love this panning shot, quite odd and surreal, two slightly larger than average men balancing on a small motorbike, and travelling at speed! The colours of the shot really set it off, especially those bright orange gloves. Couldve been a bit sharper on the bodies.
Unlocker: A nice shot of the swan, I can see slight movements in the wings; perhaps a slightly slower shutter speed would exagerate that movement yet keep the body sharp?
promhandicam: Not sure I like this one, lacks contrast and its very hard to tell that its a fisherman, perhaps panning would be better.
Utopia Poppy: I like the composition with the bridge, and the curve of the road adds a nice touch especially with the blur, but with one element sharp (the red car perhaps) the shot would have had more impact
McBrian: "I believe I can fly" eh? Nice shot and good use of equiptment, but you shouldve cropped the left twenty pixels off, and i think if the legs were both down, it wouldve made for a nicer shot. priceless expression
hefty1: interesting subject and nice crop, though a bit sharper and the image wouldve been top class. I realise he was travelling fast though, so that was probably hard to do.
rparmar: awesome spot for a photo, but I personally wouldve cropped out the blown out line top right, and maybe composed the photo more to the right to allow the please drive slowly sign to be more in towards the centre. Nice original idea though.
1st: GaryMoffat with his big splash
2nd: namstoop with his balancing act
3rd: Daniel Bridge with his speeding car
Highly commended (no order): McBrian for his original idea and great use of lighting, Malo1961 for the wonderful colours and technique, johnriley for his interesting editing.
Well done to all, an excellent round!
http://www.behance.net/robbranigan
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
Posted 24/03/2008 - 06:16
Link
Well done Garry, I'll buy you a coffee, nice judging Rob, gets harder every week to pick a winner.
Hopefully get a better composition today, have three shoots arranged, looks like I'm gonna be nackered tomorrow again
Quote:
but you shouldve cropped the left twenty pixels off
You know this, I was so nackered last night I never noticed but chuffed with the highly commended, thanks but you shouldve cropped the left twenty pixels off
Hopefully get a better composition today, have three shoots arranged, looks like I'm gonna be nackered tomorrow again
Cheers
Brian.
LBA is good for you, a Lens a day helps you work, rest and play.
Brian.
LBA is good for you, a Lens a day helps you work, rest and play.
Posted 24/03/2008 - 06:58
Link
Congratulations to Garry and many thanks to Rob for the judging carried out so soon after the deadline.
Roll on the next one
Roll on the next one
Hyram
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Posted 24/03/2008 - 07:17
Link
Thanks Rob, for the highly commended. And a very fast judging too!
There were again some wonderful entries this round, so the jugging part must get harder every round.( Even if you start a day to soon. )
Congrats to all winners.
Martin.
There were again some wonderful entries this round, so the jugging part must get harder every round.( Even if you start a day to soon. )
Congrats to all winners.
Martin.
Posted 24/03/2008 - 07:29
Link
wow, thank you! First time here and 2nd place, not bad
Posted 24/03/2008 - 07:50
Link
Quote:
wow, thank you! First time here and 2nd place, not bad
I really like your picture.wow, thank you! First time here and 2nd place, not bad
Is this type of racing an Estonian speciality :
Hyram
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Posted 24/03/2008 - 08:38
Link
Quote:
Is this type of racing an Estonian speciality :
well, maybe, I don't know . namstoop wrote:
wow, thank you! First time here and 2nd place, not bad
I really like your picture.wow, thank you! First time here and 2nd place, not bad
Is this type of racing an Estonian speciality :
It was second time, as far as I know and its was more about having fun, riding with old russian bicycles (with tiny motors), than compete with each other.
There wasn't age and gender based restriction, so there was big guys like on this picture and the same time young kids also.
But sure it was pure fun to watch, and - I guess - to ride also
I have more pictures from that event, if you interested:
http://pildistoop.trsm.pri.ee/thumbnails.php?album=38
Posted 24/03/2008 - 08:42
Link
Nice assessment, well thought through!
Congrats as always to the winners. Look forward to the next challenge...
Congrats as always to the winners. Look forward to the next challenge...
Best regards, John
Posted 24/03/2008 - 11:18
Link
Excellent (and speedy) judging Rob and congratulations to Gary for the win - I look forward to next week's
Joining the Q
Posted 24/03/2008 - 11:25
Link
Dan,
Is that an original colour for a Vitesse :
Most that I have seen have been in pastel colours.
Is that an original colour for a Vitesse :
Most that I have seen have been in pastel colours.
Hyram
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Posted 24/03/2008 - 12:03
Link
Quote:
Well done Garry, I'll buy you a coffee, nice judging Rob, gets harder every week to pick a winner.
Hopefully get a better composition today, have three shoots arranged, looks like I'm gonna be nackered tomorrow again
I figured as much, infact, I didnt notice myself until I was judging them through (I critiqued then judged)
Well done Garry, I'll buy you a coffee, nice judging Rob, gets harder every week to pick a winner.
Quote:
but you shouldve cropped the left twenty pixels off
You know this, I was so nackered last night I never noticed but chuffed with the highly commended, thanks but you shouldve cropped the left twenty pixels off
Hopefully get a better composition today, have three shoots arranged, looks like I'm gonna be nackered tomorrow again
http://www.behance.net/robbranigan
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
Posted 24/03/2008 - 12:14
Link
Wow! (1st place) *blush* Exciting stuff for me as I am new to photography, still in my first year.
Excellent judging Rob, hope I can make some good comments.
Well done to everyone.
Take you up on that coffee Brian
New competition posted. Hope I have posted correctly. ?
Excellent judging Rob, hope I can make some good comments.
Well done to everyone.
Take you up on that coffee Brian
New competition posted. Hope I have posted correctly. ?
Posted 24/03/2008 - 12:57
Link
Thanks for a swift and well executed judgement Rob and congrats to Garry for the nice shot!
I especially liked Dan's and Malo's shots this time round.
Looking at the new topic I could submit the same entry again...
Cheers,
Prieni
I especially liked Dan's and Malo's shots this time round.
Looking at the new topic I could submit the same entry again...
Cheers,
Prieni
How inappropriate to call this planet earth when it is quite clearly Ocean. - Arthur C. Clarke
Prieni's PPG page
Prieni's PPG page
Posted 24/03/2008 - 15:57
Link
Quote:
rparmar: awesome spot for a photo, but I personally wouldve cropped out the blown out line top right, and maybe composed the photo more to the right to allow the please drive slowly sign to be more in towards the centre. Nice original idea though.
Thanks for the comments. Not sure I'll ever be going past that spot at night again... but I'll try for a different framing if I do!rparmar: awesome spot for a photo, but I personally wouldve cropped out the blown out line top right, and maybe composed the photo more to the right to allow the please drive slowly sign to be more in towards the centre. Nice original idea though.
Quote:
1st: GaryMoffat with his big splash
2nd: namstoop with his balancing act
3rd: Daniel Bridge with his speeding car
All well-deserved. I particularly like the winning shot, but the balancing act is an attention getter for sure. Well done all!
1st: GaryMoffat with his big splash
2nd: namstoop with his balancing act
3rd: Daniel Bridge with his speeding car
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1088 posts
18 years
Ireland
(Taken today specifically for this contest.)
(This is a bit late since I had difficulty uploading.)