Wanted: Sigma 70-200mm

Lynton
Posted 15/07/2010 - 18:27 Link
Hi all,

Am looking for one of these:

Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM II Lens

At a reasonable and sensible price. SRS are doing them at £659..... so if you have one that yuo no longer love nor use, let me know............

Thanks


Lynton
Pwynnej
Posted 15/07/2010 - 21:39 Link
I think £659 is a reasonable price...
Z-1p, K-1, P50
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
Lynton
Posted 15/07/2010 - 21:46 Link
So do I. I am not questioning the reasonableness of the price of a new one, but before I went and bought new, I thought I might see if a fellow pentax user had one that they seldom used and were considering selling?????

That way if a mutually acceptable price was agreed, they would get a wadge of £, and I would get the lens I am looking for..........

Hence the first part of the thread saying "Wanted", not "I think this lens is expensive"


Looks like you have far too many lenses (going by your sig!) - Want to part with the 70-200 ???
Edited by Lynton: 15/07/2010 - 21:48
Mike-P
Posted 15/07/2010 - 22:30 Link
If you are not worried about HSM then have a look at the Tamron 70-200mm .. it is apparently sharper than the Sigma macro varieties. IMO the only Sigma 70-200mm lenses worth having are the non macro variety as they put an extra element in to get closer focusing but at the expense of sharpness at the long end.



Edit: can't spell.
Edited by Mike-P: 15/07/2010 - 22:48
Pwynnej
Posted 15/07/2010 - 22:42 Link
Lynton wrote:
So do I. I am not questioning the reasonableness of the price of a new one, but before I went and bought new, I thought I might see if a fellow pentax user had one that they seldom used and were considering selling?????

That way if a mutually acceptable price was agreed, they would get a wadge of £, and I would get the lens I am looking for..........

Hence the first part of the thread saying "Wanted", not "I think this lens is expensive"


Looks like you have far too many lenses (going by your sig!) - Want to part with the 70-200 ???
£658 to you young man - but mine is the EX IF (pre-DG)

Considering the prices Sigma lenses have been just recently, and the fact that the lens you are after is the most recent incarnation I think the SRS price is good, and because the 70-200 EX has a good rep in all its incarnations, not many are likely to come on sale.

Good luck anyway - the 70-200 is a good match for a DSLR.
Z-1p, K-1, P50
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
MrCynical
Posted 16/07/2010 - 00:26 Link
Mike-P wrote:
If you are not worried about HSM then have a look at the Tamron 70-200mm .. it is apparently sharper than the Sigma macro varieties. IMO the only Sigma 70-200mm lenses worth having are the non macro variety as they put an extra element in to get closer focusing but at the expense of sharpness at the long end.
Though IIRC the HSM version of the Sigma has quick shift focus while the Tamron and pre-HSM Sigmas do not.
Mike-P
Posted 16/07/2010 - 06:49 Link
You maybe correct about the quickshift .. I am not sure.
It's a nice feature but not something I use on my Pentax lenses anyway but I suppose it may be useful to some.
johnwhit
Posted 16/07/2010 - 07:12 Link
Mike-P wrote:
You maybe correct about the quickshift .. I am not sure.
It's a nice feature but not something I use on my Pentax lenses anyway but I suppose it may be useful to some.
I find it very useful for wildlife when the focus is lost in dense foliage with small subjects, also when using Teleconverters with a tendency to hunt in AF. I've nearly always got my left hand supporting the lens under the focus ring on large Tele's 300mm+. It took a little getting used to but now has become second nature, I wouldn't want to be without it now.

Regards,

John
PPG link

In LBA hiatus.
mille19
Posted 16/07/2010 - 08:03 Link
Mike-P wrote:
If you are not worried about HSM then have a look at the Tamron 70-200mm .. it is apparently sharper than the Sigma macro varieties. IMO the only Sigma 70-200mm lenses worth having are the non macro variety as they put an extra element in to get closer focusing but at the expense of sharpness at the long end.
I use the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM II Lens mainly for taking rugby and motorsport and have no problem with sharpness. Stopped down to F5.6 it's nearly on par with my DA* 300mm.
Mike-P
Posted 16/07/2010 - 12:42 Link
mille19 wrote:


I use the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM II Lens mainly for taking rugby and motorsport and have no problem with sharpness. Stopped down to F5.6 it's nearly on par with my DA* 300mm.
Before I purchased my non HSM non macro version I tried 2 copies of the newer model .. wide open at f2.8/200mm the older lens wiped the floor with it. Have since seen this reported on the other Pentax forum a few times now.
thoughton
Posted 16/07/2010 - 12:52 Link
Mike-P wrote:
Have since seen this reported on the other Pentax forum a few times now.
Me too - which is why i went for someone's non-macro version Comment Image


Although I recently read something that said the new Sigma 70-200 HSM (OS version) has dropped the macro facility so hopefully it is back up to the standard of the old non-macro.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Edited by thoughton: 16/07/2010 - 12:53
Mike-P
Posted 16/07/2010 - 13:00 Link
thoughton wrote:


Although I recently read something that said the new Sigma 70-200 HSM (OS version) has dropped the macro facility so hopefully it is back up to the standard of the old non-macro.
Have you seen the RRP?

A shade under £1500
thoughton
Posted 16/07/2010 - 13:23 Link
Whoa! No I didn't know that. I can cross that one off my LBA list then
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Lynton
Posted 20/07/2010 - 22:44 Link
right, ok - we've chatted about various lenses...........

anyone selling what I asked for??????
Pwynnej
Posted 21/07/2010 - 08:56 Link
SRS

Unless you want to make a sensible offer for my 70-200 EX IF.
Z-1p, K-1, P50
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo