Wanted: Sigma 70-200mm
Posted 15/07/2010 - 21:39
Link
I think £659 is a reasonable price...
Z-1p, K-1, P50
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
Posted 15/07/2010 - 21:46
Link
So do I. I am not questioning the reasonableness of the price of a new one, but before I went and bought new, I thought I might see if a fellow pentax user had one that they seldom used and were considering selling?????
That way if a mutually acceptable price was agreed, they would get a wadge of £, and I would get the lens I am looking for..........
Hence the first part of the thread saying "Wanted", not "I think this lens is expensive"
Looks like you have far too many lenses (going by your sig!) - Want to part with the 70-200 ???
That way if a mutually acceptable price was agreed, they would get a wadge of £, and I would get the lens I am looking for..........
Hence the first part of the thread saying "Wanted", not "I think this lens is expensive"
Looks like you have far too many lenses (going by your sig!) - Want to part with the 70-200 ???
Posted 15/07/2010 - 22:30
Link
If you are not worried about HSM then have a look at the Tamron 70-200mm .. it is apparently sharper than the Sigma macro varieties. IMO the only Sigma 70-200mm lenses worth having are the non macro variety as they put an extra element in to get closer focusing but at the expense of sharpness at the long end.
Edit: can't spell.
Edit: can't spell.
Posted 15/07/2010 - 22:42
Link
Lynton wrote:
So do I. I am not questioning the reasonableness of the price of a new one, but before I went and bought new, I thought I might see if a fellow pentax user had one that they seldom used and were considering selling?????
That way if a mutually acceptable price was agreed, they would get a wadge of £, and I would get the lens I am looking for..........
Hence the first part of the thread saying "Wanted", not "I think this lens is expensive"
Looks like you have far too many lenses (going by your sig!) - Want to part with the 70-200 ???
£658 to you young man - but mine is the EX IF (pre-DG)So do I. I am not questioning the reasonableness of the price of a new one, but before I went and bought new, I thought I might see if a fellow pentax user had one that they seldom used and were considering selling?????
That way if a mutually acceptable price was agreed, they would get a wadge of £, and I would get the lens I am looking for..........
Hence the first part of the thread saying "Wanted", not "I think this lens is expensive"
Looks like you have far too many lenses (going by your sig!) - Want to part with the 70-200 ???
Considering the prices Sigma lenses have been just recently, and the fact that the lens you are after is the most recent incarnation I think the SRS price is good, and because the 70-200 EX has a good rep in all its incarnations, not many are likely to come on sale.
Good luck anyway - the 70-200 is a good match for a DSLR.
Z-1p, K-1, P50
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
Posted 16/07/2010 - 00:26
Link
Mike-P wrote:
If you are not worried about HSM then have a look at the Tamron 70-200mm .. it is apparently sharper than the Sigma macro varieties. IMO the only Sigma 70-200mm lenses worth having are the non macro variety as they put an extra element in to get closer focusing but at the expense of sharpness at the long end.
Though IIRC the HSM version of the Sigma has quick shift focus while the Tamron and pre-HSM Sigmas do not.
If you are not worried about HSM then have a look at the Tamron 70-200mm .. it is apparently sharper than the Sigma macro varieties. IMO the only Sigma 70-200mm lenses worth having are the non macro variety as they put an extra element in to get closer focusing but at the expense of sharpness at the long end.
Posted 16/07/2010 - 07:12
Link
Mike-P wrote:
You maybe correct about the quickshift .. I am not sure.
It's a nice feature but not something I use on my Pentax lenses anyway but I suppose it may be useful to some.
I find it very useful for wildlife when the focus is lost in dense foliage with small subjects, also when using Teleconverters with a tendency to hunt in AF. I've nearly always got my left hand supporting the lens under the focus ring on large Tele's 300mm+. It took a little getting used to but now has become second nature, I wouldn't want to be without it now.You maybe correct about the quickshift .. I am not sure.
It's a nice feature but not something I use on my Pentax lenses anyway but I suppose it may be useful to some.
Regards,
John
Posted 16/07/2010 - 08:03
Link
Mike-P wrote:
If you are not worried about HSM then have a look at the Tamron 70-200mm .. it is apparently sharper than the Sigma macro varieties. IMO the only Sigma 70-200mm lenses worth having are the non macro variety as they put an extra element in to get closer focusing but at the expense of sharpness at the long end.
I use the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM II Lens mainly for taking rugby and motorsport and have no problem with sharpness. Stopped down to F5.6 it's nearly on par with my DA* 300mm.
If you are not worried about HSM then have a look at the Tamron 70-200mm .. it is apparently sharper than the Sigma macro varieties. IMO the only Sigma 70-200mm lenses worth having are the non macro variety as they put an extra element in to get closer focusing but at the expense of sharpness at the long end.
Posted 16/07/2010 - 12:42
Link
mille19 wrote:
I use the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM II Lens mainly for taking rugby and motorsport and have no problem with sharpness. Stopped down to F5.6 it's nearly on par with my DA* 300mm.
Before I purchased my non HSM non macro version I tried 2 copies of the newer model .. wide open at f2.8/200mm the older lens wiped the floor with it. Have since seen this reported on the other Pentax forum a few times now.
I use the Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM II Lens mainly for taking rugby and motorsport and have no problem with sharpness. Stopped down to F5.6 it's nearly on par with my DA* 300mm.
Posted 16/07/2010 - 12:52
Link
Mike-P wrote:
Have since seen this reported on the other Pentax forum a few times now.
Me too - which is why i went for someone's non-macro version Have since seen this reported on the other Pentax forum a few times now.

Although I recently read something that said the new Sigma 70-200 HSM (OS version) has dropped the macro facility so hopefully it is back up to the standard of the old non-macro.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 16/07/2010 - 13:23
Link
Whoa! No I didn't know that. I can cross that one off my LBA list then
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 20/07/2010 - 22:44
Link
right, ok - we've chatted about various lenses...........
anyone selling what I asked for??????
anyone selling what I asked for??????
Posted 21/07/2010 - 08:56
Link
SRS
Unless you want to make a sensible offer for my 70-200 EX IF.
Unless you want to make a sensible offer for my 70-200 EX IF.
Z-1p, K-1, P50
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
F50 1.7. SMC-FAs 24, 35, 50 1.4, 85, 135. HD-FA15-30, DFA24-70, D-FA*70-200. The SMC-FA Limited Trinity.
Metz 45 CL-4, AF500FTZ. AF540FGZ.
Some Mamiya and some Nikon, and a Canon T70.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


214 posts
17 years
Am looking for one of these:
Sigma 70-200mm F2.8 EX DG MACRO HSM II Lens
At a reasonable and sensible price. SRS are doing them at £659..... so if you have one that yuo no longer love nor use, let me know............
Thanks
Lynton