Walkabout Lens on a Budget
Posted 11/05/2011 - 11:14
Link
I'd go for the Petax 18-55mm and 50-200mm WR lenses, they are compact enough to carry 2 lenses and stopped down offer very good image quality for the money, with bonus of being able to stand the English weather.
Posted 11/05/2011 - 11:29
Link
good advice!
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 11/05/2011 - 11:32
Link
or the sigma 18-200
regards
Roy
Pentax K3 gripped,and some lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pentaxroy/
my pbase gallery
Roy
Pentax K3 gripped,and some lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pentaxroy/
my pbase gallery
Posted 11/05/2011 - 11:36
Link
regards
Roy
Pentax K3 gripped,and some lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pentaxroy/
my pbase gallery
Roy
Pentax K3 gripped,and some lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pentaxroy/
my pbase gallery
Posted 11/05/2011 - 12:23
Link
Thanks Roy, that's a useful link. Is the Sigma a good lens? Already have both the Pentax 18-55mm and 50-200mm lenses but neither on their own are what I would call a walkabout lens. Any other suggestions?
Posted 11/05/2011 - 13:23
Link
i have used that lens and found it very good,there is now the 18-250 but will cost more of course.
regards
Roy
Pentax K3 gripped,and some lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pentaxroy/
my pbase gallery
Roy
Pentax K3 gripped,and some lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pentaxroy/
my pbase gallery
Posted 11/05/2011 - 15:34
Link
£150 will buy the new DA 35mm f2.4, great walkabout lens as it'd make your K-r little bigger than a bridge camera.
If you want even cheaper and can deal with manual lenses then the old Pentax-M 28mm f3.5 would suit, target price for those would be between £50-£70.
Edit, I notice you say 18-200mm but at least consider a prime, the image quality is much better!
If you want even cheaper and can deal with manual lenses then the old Pentax-M 28mm f3.5 would suit, target price for those would be between £50-£70.
Edit, I notice you say 18-200mm but at least consider a prime, the image quality is much better!
Matt
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Shooting the Welsh Wilderness with K-m, KX, MX, ME Super and assorted lenses.
Posted 11/05/2011 - 17:08
Link
I recently picked up a used Tamron 18-250 for £180 off Ebay which is only slightly above your budget - it's regularly quoted as the best "walkabout" available and my initial impressions certainly are positive
Simon
Simon
My website http://www.landscapephotographyuk.com
My Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/landscapephotographyuk
Find me on Google+ link
My Facebook page http://www.facebook.com/landscapephotographyuk
Find me on Google+ link
Posted 11/05/2011 - 19:15
Link
The Tamron 18-250 I have was bought as a holiday lens - a do-it-all .
I find it's fairly heavy in use - compared with my old 40mm LTD and the Pentax DA-L 18-55 and the new Pentax 35mm . I always have to remember about the lens lock and I do find putting the Hood back on in the reverse position is a real PITA .
Having said that - it really makes taking camera, lens/es and all the necessary stuff much easier - it covers everything I need to use . It was in use for everything I took in Dublin recently and it's going with me to France at the beginning of next month . I really would not be without it
I find it's fairly heavy in use - compared with my old 40mm LTD and the Pentax DA-L 18-55 and the new Pentax 35mm . I always have to remember about the lens lock and I do find putting the Hood back on in the reverse position is a real PITA .
Having said that - it really makes taking camera, lens/es and all the necessary stuff much easier - it covers everything I need to use . It was in use for everything I took in Dublin recently and it's going with me to France at the beginning of next month . I really would not be without it
let the education continue
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
Posted 12/05/2011 - 10:02
Link
Thanks for your suggestions. Im leaning towards the Tamron simply because of the extra range.
Posted 12/05/2011 - 10:05
Link
Another vote for the ease / quality combination of the Tamron / Pentax (basically the same lens) 18-250 secondhand.
Sharon's: K-x, FA35/2, DA 18-250.Glen's: K10D, DA100 Macro, 55-300, Paragon 500, Silk Pro700 Tripod
Posted 12/05/2011 - 11:55
Link
Image quality from either lens 18-200 or 18-250 is very acceptable.
regards
Roy
Pentax K3 gripped,and some lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pentaxroy/
my pbase gallery
Roy
Pentax K3 gripped,and some lenses
https://www.flickr.com/photos/pentaxroy/
my pbase gallery
Posted 12/05/2011 - 18:31
Link
cardiff_gareth wrote:
The problem is large superzooms is they are never going to give you the quality of a smaller shorter zoom so you have to work out what you want to trade off, either having to carry 2 lenses and do lens changes on the fly, choosing a lens that has a good zoom range but not OTT, or getting a superzoom and trading image quality for convieniance :
A 17-70 is surely a good walk about lens, you can do almost everything with that, you're only missing the longer lengths you might want to use with wildlife but for landscapes, architecture, indoor, portraits can all be done with a 17-70.The problem is large superzooms is they are never going to give you the quality of a smaller shorter zoom so you have to work out what you want to trade off, either having to carry 2 lenses and do lens changes on the fly, choosing a lens that has a good zoom range but not OTT, or getting a superzoom and trading image quality for convieniance :
Also these lenses are faster and have a better quality, with a superzoom you will have problems shooting indoors most likely because of the limited light.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



22 posts
15 years
Portsmouth