UV Filters
This topic has a poll - login to enter
Posted 28/04/2011 - 12:18
Link
Your poll is flawed and will reveal nothing.
I have UV/Skylight filters to fit almost every lens I own and use them selectively such as around salt water or abrasive dust. So I use them and I don't use them.
I have UV/Skylight filters to fit almost every lens I own and use them selectively such as around salt water or abrasive dust. So I use them and I don't use them.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Posted 28/04/2011 - 12:52
Link
same interpretation as Pentaxophile, so +1
Steve
Steve
Posted 28/04/2011 - 16:02
Link
Sadly, nobody can, but your explanation will suffice I'm sure. It looks quite positive so far, tending towards a No vote....
Best regards, John
Posted 28/04/2011 - 16:32
Link
gartmore wrote:
Your poll is flawed and will reveal nothing.
I have UV/Skylight filters to fit almost every lens I own and use them selectively such as around salt water or abrasive dust. So I use them and I don't use them.
+1
Your poll is flawed and will reveal nothing.
I have UV/Skylight filters to fit almost every lens I own and use them selectively such as around salt water or abrasive dust. So I use them and I don't use them.
http://frogfish.smugmug.com/ Pentax. Pentax DA*300/4, Cosina 55/1.2, Lens Baby Composer Pro & Edge 80, AFA x1.7, Metz 50 af1.
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Nikon. D800. D600. Sigma 500/4.5, Nikon 300/2.8 VRII, Sigma 120-300/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 21/2.8, Zeiss Distagon ZF2 35/2.0, Sigma 50/1.4, Nikkor 85/1.8, Nikon TC20EIII, Nikon TC14EII, Kenko x1.4, Sigma 2.0
Posted 28/04/2011 - 17:44
Link
Thanks for clarifying, so a 'no' from me.
Posted 28/04/2011 - 18:02
Link
Ever tried to fit one on a fisheye?
Posted 28/04/2011 - 18:23
Link
I'm eagerly awaiting delivery of a UV transmitting filter (blocks visible). When that comes I hope I'll give it some use .
I do have standard UV filters for most (not quite all) my lenses, though I don't normally use them. The last time I was photographing near sea spray I didn't have one with me...
Sometimes I'd like to get a couple of camera bags big enough for all my kit, along with a Sherpa or two to carry it! Fortunately it's not too often I find I need something that's back at home.
I do have standard UV filters for most (not quite all) my lenses, though I don't normally use them. The last time I was photographing near sea spray I didn't have one with me...
Sometimes I'd like to get a couple of camera bags big enough for all my kit, along with a Sherpa or two to carry it! Fortunately it's not too often I find I need something that's back at home.
Posted 28/04/2011 - 19:43
Link
NaimKhan wrote:
Hello all.
Following a couple of recent threads about UV filters, where different people gave differing opinions about their preference, I thought I will do a simple poll to see how many use them and how many don't.
Thanks for voting.
The coatings on the lens already cuts the UV quite a bit and there is a filter also on the sensor that cuts it as well so to put a third filter on it to remove the UV sounds like an overkill to me.
Hello all.
Following a couple of recent threads about UV filters, where different people gave differing opinions about their preference, I thought I will do a simple poll to see how many use them and how many don't.
Thanks for voting.
Posted 28/04/2011 - 20:18
Link
I tend to have one in place most of the time - Then I remove it to maybe use a CPL or ND then forget to replace it, or as it's in my pocket somewhere and probably needs de-dusting. When I get home I put it back on.
As to why - I've no idea I was told (taught?) many years ago that it would protect the lens.
I have noticed that flare is sometimes attributed to this filter being in place especially when shooting close to the sun angle.
regards
Bernard
As to why - I've no idea I was told (taught?) many years ago that it would protect the lens.
I have noticed that flare is sometimes attributed to this filter being in place especially when shooting close to the sun angle.
regards
Bernard
Posted 28/04/2011 - 21:31
Link
Frogherder wrote:
As to why - I've no idea I was told (taught?) many years ago that it would protect the lens.
That's true, (very) old lenses often have a "soft" front element or coating so a filter takes care of that but now a days the front coatings are very tough so there is no need for the filter anymore. The front elements/coatings now are even tougher than the UV filter since the filter is only a thin piece of glass or plastic so don't expect much protection besides against corrosive materials.
As to why - I've no idea I was told (taught?) many years ago that it would protect the lens.
Posted 28/04/2011 - 22:13
Link
I had got into the habit of using them in my film days, and when I got my K30, carried on using them.
Now I find myself removing them with the lens cap.
Now I find myself removing them with the lens cap.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



411 posts
17 years
Wakefield,
West Yorkshire
Following a couple of recent threads about UV filters, where different people gave differing opinions about their preference, I thought I will do a simple poll to see how many use them and how many don't.
Thanks for voting.