Two Bodies
Posted 12/10/2014 - 13:24
Link
There have been occasions when I wish I had two bodies so that I had a back-up when I broke the main one... On the whole, however, I think it depends on what you photograph. If you do a lot of sports for example, you might want one with a telephoto zoom and one with a mid-range zoom. If you mainly take static things like I do, the second body is probably a luxury. I kept my K10D for a while after I got the K20D, and found that I never used it, so I sold it on.
K.
K.
Kris Lockyear
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
It is an illusion that photos are made with the camera… they are made with the eye, heart and head. Henri Cartier-Bresson
Lots of film bodies, a couple of digital ones, too many lenses (mainly older glass) and a Horseman LE 5x4.
Posted 12/10/2014 - 13:44
Link
When doing critical stuff, like shooting a wedding for example, then it's essential to have backups for every situation.
Sue and I use a K-5 each, but there's always the backup K20D available.
Sue and I use a K-5 each, but there's always the backup K20D available.
Best regards, John
Posted 12/10/2014 - 14:18
Link
Pentax bodies and lenses are so small it's easy to carry two bodies and minimise all the lens switching and missing shots. However, they should really be the same model otherwise you will find yourself favouring the best body to the extent that you end up swapping lenses anyway. K3 an K7 is such a jump I doubt you would ever use the K7 again for anything casual.
It would make a good workhorse in the studio or for test shots rather than using up the actuations on your K3
It would make a good workhorse in the studio or for test shots rather than using up the actuations on your K3
Posted 12/10/2014 - 17:55
Link
Blythman wrote:
Double up when walking around, for example
16-50 on one. 50-135 on other
or 18-135 on one and 300mm on the other.
That's exactly what I do.Double up when walking around, for example
16-50 on one. 50-135 on other
or 18-135 on one and 300mm on the other.
David
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
Posted 12/10/2014 - 18:36
Link
davidtrout wrote:
David
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
I also do this, not the same lenses but the same principal
Blythman wrote:
Double up when walking around, for example
16-50 on one. 50-135 on other
or 18-135 on one and 300mm on the other.
That's exactly what I do.Double up when walking around, for example
16-50 on one. 50-135 on other
or 18-135 on one and 300mm on the other.
David
PPG: http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/artists/davidtrout
Posted 12/10/2014 - 20:01
Link
I just started to double up, with wildlife as my favourite subject I found carrying one body too restrictive as nature can be very unpredictable and too often have find myself in a situation not be able to change lenses quick enough (or lost the subject due making to much noise or to much movement when doing this).
Posted 12/10/2014 - 20:06
Link
i like the idea of doubling up but as suggested would favor the one body and even then wouldn't know which one to pair with what lens.
I think im best selling and putting the money towards another lens.
I think im best selling and putting the money towards another lens.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


209 posts
16 years
Worcestershire
I like the idea of having 2 bodies but cant thing of any occasions where i would need the 2?
But it doesnt seem worth selling the K7 as its not really worth much.
Any thoughts?