Twitter spellings test

johnriley
Posted 17/07/2011 - 23:57 Link
My how time flies...
Best regards, John
Pentaxophile
Posted 17/07/2011 - 23:59 Link
thoughton wrote:
My own personal spelling bugbear on the net is people who think an apostrophe and an 'S' makes something plural. In fact there are several people on this forum who do it
I know it is wrong, but I will do this when talking about Pentax A lenses and Pentax M lenses. I'll call them Pentax A's or M's for brevity. As and Ms looks wrong.
Anvh
Posted 18/07/2011 - 11:52 Link
Pentaxophile wrote:
Revived by Messrs. Mike Myers and Dana Carvey c.1992

Comment Image
I wanted to say, hey i know that logo but just pretend i didn't okay
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
Posted 22/08/2011 - 17:45 Link
I tested 100%. You would be surprise the amount of adults who have issues with spelling and the use of certain words correctly. I think my biggest pet peeve is the misuse of the following: there, their, they're,and to,too,two, and hear, here, and your you're. This is basic grade school stuff, but it boggles my mind that people still get it wrong. Especially people with degrees.
michaelblue
Posted 22/08/2011 - 17:59 Link
....and people who use 'say again' 'no way' and 'uz' instead of US! and all those other irritating 'americanisms' ....makes my blood boil!!!
Regards,
Michael
Edited by michaelblue: 22/08/2011 - 17:59
Anvh
Posted 22/08/2011 - 18:05 Link
ZayThomas28 wrote:
I tested 100%. You would be surprise the amount of adults who have issues with spelling and the use of certain words correctly. I think my biggest pet peeve is the misuse of the following: there, their, they're,and to,too,two, and hear, here, and your you're. This is basic grade school stuff, but it boggles my mind that people still get it wrong. Especially people with degrees.
People with degree are often mostly specialise in something and are therefore not good in other things.
Most of the brilliant minds the world has known had some defect in one form or another.

michaelblue wrote:
....and people who use 'say again' 'no way' and 'uz' instead of US! and all those other irritating 'americanisms' ....makes my blood boil!!!
http://s3.amazonaws.com/theoatmeal-img/comics/minor_differences4/accents1.png
Stefan
Comment Image

K10D, K5
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, D-FA 100 Macro, DA 40 Ltd, DA 18-55
AF-540FGZ
greynolds999
Posted 22/08/2011 - 21:23 Link
I can cope with misspelling - language changes over time anyway. I can deal with "alot" instead of "a lot".

After all, none of us say "God be with you" - we use the contracted "Goodbye".

But the one which drives me mad is "of" instead of "have", when people say "should of" and "could of" (I think it's a de-contraction of "should've" and "could've") simply because it makes absolutely no sense!
puma
Posted 22/08/2011 - 21:49 Link
With kids the way they spell today with mobile phones and text messages its all out the window anyway the English language has had it now.
PPG link
fatspider
Posted 22/08/2011 - 21:55 Link
I just tried to google and yahoo "lense" neither could offer anything other than lenses
My Names Alan, and I'm a lensaholic.
My PPG link
My Flckr link
moose
Posted 22/08/2011 - 23:05 Link
Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a toatl mses and you can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.
myles
Posted 23/08/2011 - 00:24 Link
Moose's spellchecker is now a quivering wreck in a padded cell!

Myles
Smeggypants
Posted 23/08/2011 - 00:50 Link
Anvh wrote:
This the one John.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Merriam-Websters-Medical-Dictionary-Prescription-Underst...=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1310762074&sr=8-1 only 1,33 Pounds used

Merriam-Webster's Medical Dictionary and Merriam-Webster is a subsidiary of Encyclopędia Britannica.
Merriam Webster lost all credibility when it added the #2 and #3 definitions here, and then failed to remove them for too many years.

if it spells 'lens' as 'lense' then it loses even more credibility. Just because somethign is "published" does not make it right or credible or reliable
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo