Todays pics, not convinced!

Telstar
Posted 13/07/2009 - 00:45 Link
Hi all, some CC needed again i'm afraid.
Popped out to a local park today with the girlfriend to get some pics as had an hour spare and the weather was surprisingly pleasant.

Got the following pics, (and plenty more, the 'best*' of which are on my Flickr)

Now they are mostly sharp (to my eyes) and seem exposed correctly on my admittedly non-calibrated screen but they just dont jump at me as any good. Must say not impressed myself so any pointers as to what i could be doing to improve?
Most were with the 50-200 tripod mounted (though at iso 400 purely because I had forgotten I had been in low-light last time I had used the camera! Doh!). I don't see that as the problem - more composition issues to me

Comment Image

Comment Image

Comment Image

Comment Image

Comment Image


The only pic I ended up happy with was this one (out of about 60 odd), which was a quickly improvised shot where I laid the tripod down to about 15 degree's, quickly framed and focused and clicked off a shot...

Comment Image
Bodies: GX20 | MZ-3 | MZ-M | Auto 110 complete kit
Primes: DA*300 F4 | DA40 F2.8 Ltd. | SMC-A 50/1.7 | Sigma 30mm F1.4 | Sirius 28/2.8
Macro : SMC-A Dental 100 macro
Zooms: 12-24 SA | 18-55 SA | 50-200 SA | 28-80 FA | 35-80 F | Vivitar 28-200
Other: Bellows | Tube sets | Vivitar 2x PK/A Tele | SEF-36PZF Flash | SBG-D1V Grip | Billingham 335


My Flickr
gartmore
Posted 13/07/2009 - 09:03 Link
I like the secon one but I'd get rid of the two heads on the right. I think they all look a little flat but easily tweaked in Levels like this:

Comment Image


Ken
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Edited by gartmore: 13/07/2009 - 09:03
timcx500e
Posted 13/07/2009 - 09:15 Link
ken, what levels adjustment have you applied ? im asking because i also have a 50-200 . thanks, tim.
gartmore
Posted 13/07/2009 - 09:27 Link
I have to 50-200 too and I dont think it is a particularly 'flat' lens but anyway, I moved the right hand slider along to meet the curve and then moved the middle one to get the most pleasing result. All done by eye I'm afraid.

I think the picure I tweaked and the one of the yellow flowers are just slightly underexposed, I wish people wouldn't strip off the metadata
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
Telstar
Posted 14/07/2009 - 00:23 Link
Thanks for the comments Ken, and yes the levels did need a tweak, I hadnt PP'd any of those shots - though i usually do have to. It appears my body does suffer the 'standard' underexpose issues that i've read about for the 10's - I take it that theres a setting hid somewhere whereby i can permanently set the camera to +1ev and then forget about it? will this suit general shooting or will i have to look at custom setting for each occasion?

Thanks Tel.
Bodies: GX20 | MZ-3 | MZ-M | Auto 110 complete kit
Primes: DA*300 F4 | DA40 F2.8 Ltd. | SMC-A 50/1.7 | Sigma 30mm F1.4 | Sirius 28/2.8
Macro : SMC-A Dental 100 macro
Zooms: 12-24 SA | 18-55 SA | 50-200 SA | 28-80 FA | 35-80 F | Vivitar 28-200
Other: Bellows | Tube sets | Vivitar 2x PK/A Tele | SEF-36PZF Flash | SBG-D1V Grip | Billingham 335


My Flickr

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo