This Morning

SteveT
Posted 10/12/2008 - 13:15 Link
Went out very early this morning to catch the sunrise on The Roaches in Staffordshire. As usual for me a band of cloud developed just at the wrong time.
I hung around and struggled with cold fingers until there was some light at least, funny how all thoughts of hyperfocal distance and other technical aspects were cast aside whilst I was suffering.

Anyway here are 3 of the shots I took, not that great but would like C&C anyway.

Regards
Steve

[IMG]http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f396/Hannabella/Roaches-4.jpg[/IMG]



[IMG]http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f396/Hannabella/Roaches-3.jpg[/IMG]



[IMG]http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f396/Hannabella/Roaches-2.jpg[/IMG]
K20d
DA 12-24 | DA* 16-50 | DA* 50-135 | Sigma 100-300 F4
Lightroom 2, CS3
My FlickR
Mac
Posted 10/12/2008 - 13:30 Link
Well worth the wait, Steve.

1 & 3 for me.

Great sense of depth in #1.

'Course, I'm from frosty Quebec, so #3 is kinda special.

Cheers
Mac from Montreal

SP, SPII, SPF, PZ-10, P30, SFX, K110D, istDS, Optio 60, Z-10, H90, RZ10, I-10, f3.5 28mm, f1.8 55mm, f1.4 50mm, f3.5 135mm, f2.5 135mm, f4 50mm Macro, f4.5 80-200 F, f4 35-70, f3.5 28-80, f3.5 35-135, f3.5 18-55, f1.8 31mm Ltd., two Auto 110's, Auto 110 lenses and filters, tubes, bellows, Manfrottos and a sore back.
Edited by Mac: 10/12/2008 - 13:32
SteveT
Posted 10/12/2008 - 13:43 Link
Thanks Mac, dont be afraid to knock them though. Best way to learn
K20d
DA 12-24 | DA* 16-50 | DA* 50-135 | Sigma 100-300 F4
Lightroom 2, CS3
My FlickR
ttk
Posted 10/12/2008 - 14:14 Link
No 3 for me, it would have I think made a nice HDR shot.
Tel,
neilr
Posted 10/12/2008 - 16:07 Link
number 3 for me as well . been up the Roaches too many times to mention.
no 2 the wall seems to split the picture and also leads the eye off the page, IMHO but I am just learning.

Neil
SteveT
Posted 10/12/2008 - 18:20 Link
Thanks for the comments. I tend to agree, now I look at No.2 again I don't like it and No.3 is probably the best, but don't you think the light is not so good?
K20d
DA 12-24 | DA* 16-50 | DA* 50-135 | Sigma 100-300 F4
Lightroom 2, CS3
My FlickR
Mannesty
Posted 10/12/2008 - 22:53 Link
ttk wrote:
No 3 for me, it would have I think made a nice HDR shot.
This scene certainly does not need HDR treatment. It's perfect as it is without being ruined by unnecessary processing.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
SteveT
Posted 10/12/2008 - 23:18 Link
Thanks peter, I am not really in to HDR anyway, though i would like to have a play around with it sometime.

However I have done a bit of Dodging and Burning on photo No.3 and will posy both versions again here, perhaps you could comment on which you prefer?

First so its easy to compare, the original.

[IMG]http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f396/Hannabella/Roaches-2.jpg[/IMG]



And now the Photoshopped version, literally just a little dodge and burn.

[IMG]http://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f396/Hannabella/Roachescs3work.jpg[/IMG]
K20d
DA 12-24 | DA* 16-50 | DA* 50-135 | Sigma 100-300 F4
Lightroom 2, CS3
My FlickR
Mannesty
Posted 11/12/2008 - 07:14 Link
I still like the original better. The processed version looks unnatural. Good effort though.

HDR helps with scenes that have extremes of dark and light areas and ideally needs multiple bracketed exposures. Your scene doesn't fit that criteria. It might be interesting to experiment but I doubt the original would be improved.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Edited by Mannesty: 11/12/2008 - 07:17
SteveT
Posted 11/12/2008 - 09:05 Link
Thanks for the feedback Peter
K20d
DA 12-24 | DA* 16-50 | DA* 50-135 | Sigma 100-300 F4
Lightroom 2, CS3
My FlickR
ttk
Posted 11/12/2008 - 11:39 Link
Mannesty wrote:
I still like the original better. The processed version looks unnatural. Good effort though.

HDR helps with scenes that have extremes of dark and light areas and ideally needs multiple bracketed exposures. Your scene doesn't fit that criteria. It might be interesting to experiment but I doubt the original would be improved.
DITTO..
Tel,
neilr
Posted 11/12/2008 - 16:39 Link
same for me the original one.
SteveT
Posted 12/12/2008 - 00:49 Link
Thank you guys, the original it is then
K20d
DA 12-24 | DA* 16-50 | DA* 50-135 | Sigma 100-300 F4
Lightroom 2, CS3
My FlickR
Coriander
Posted 12/12/2008 - 10:22 Link
#3, I found the sheep on the distant hill to the right rather distracting
K10D with Grip, 28mm,50mm,135mm,18-55,18-200,70-300mm, Meade 2000mm catadioptric, dodgy tripod and luck
Mac
Posted 12/12/2008 - 11:06 Link
Roland,

That's it!

I KNEW there was something about #1 that was throwing me off.

I keep trying to count them and fall asleep every time!

Still like the first shot quite a lot though, I find it has a great sense of space and depth with the cloud shadow in upper left vs perfectly slanted early morning light in lower right.
Mac from Montreal

SP, SPII, SPF, PZ-10, P30, SFX, K110D, istDS, Optio 60, Z-10, H90, RZ10, I-10, f3.5 28mm, f1.8 55mm, f1.4 50mm, f3.5 135mm, f2.5 135mm, f4 50mm Macro, f4.5 80-200 F, f4 35-70, f3.5 28-80, f3.5 35-135, f3.5 18-55, f1.8 31mm Ltd., two Auto 110's, Auto 110 lenses and filters, tubes, bellows, Manfrottos and a sore back.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo