TAMRON SP 90MM F2.5 MACRO LENS.
Posted 07/03/2011 - 19:43
Link
OldTaffy wrote:
DrOrloff's photos of fungi and the dragonfly are gorgeous! Is your lens a more recent, better bloomed one, or does it not show any flare anyway?
Martin
Thanks. I have never noticed any problem with flare.
DrOrloff's photos of fungi and the dragonfly are gorgeous! Is your lens a more recent, better bloomed one, or does it not show any flare anyway?
Martin
Posted 08/03/2011 - 10:32
Link
I've also never noticed this blue flare disc, although the only time I've used this lens stopped down as far as f11 would be in macro situations, where I suppose it would be rare for the centre of the image to be very dark.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 08/03/2011 - 18:30
Link
Just in case anyone is curious, I have put two examples up on my website. Very noticeable flare at f/22, none at f/2.5
Martin
Martin
Posted 08/03/2011 - 18:47
Link
Don't know if this info will be of use but you never know.
Tamron SP AF 90mm f/2.8 Macro 1:1 Di Lens for Pentax £248.99 Brand new www.onestop-digital.com/index.php I purchased one in Jan of this year, I think P&P came to £10 so even at £260 it was a very good deal and it arrived in 2 days, now thats service.
Tamron SP AF 90mm f/2.8 Macro 1:1 Di Lens for Pentax £248.99 Brand new www.onestop-digital.com/index.php I purchased one in Jan of this year, I think P&P came to £10 so even at £260 it was a very good deal and it arrived in 2 days, now thats service.
Fletcher8.
Posted 23/03/2011 - 13:12
Link
Quick question folks, I've been reading about this lens over at Pentax Forums and some people have suggested that it can cause severe purple flare on a Digital Body, is this the case as I've been fairly keen on grabbing one.
The other option I've been offered is a Phoenix 100mm f3.5 from a guy in the States correct me if I'm wrong but I believe this is the same as the Cosina/Vivitar lens?
The other option I've been offered is a Phoenix 100mm f3.5 from a guy in the States correct me if I'm wrong but I believe this is the same as the Cosina/Vivitar lens?
Posted 23/03/2011 - 14:19
Link
Did you read the posts before yours?
The 100mm Cosina/Vivitar/Phoenix is supposed to be pretty damn good, especially for the price. By far the least expensive AF macro lens.
The 100mm Cosina/Vivitar/Phoenix is supposed to be pretty damn good, especially for the price. By far the least expensive AF macro lens.
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
Flickr • Fluidr • PPG • Street • Portfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Posted 23/03/2011 - 14:24
Link
Well I've bought Mike's Vivitar 55mm to give that a go for now!
Posted 23/03/2011 - 14:28
Link
The answer to your question lies in the above comments Chris. I never noticed it but tended to shoot at larger apertures. IQ is outstanding at f2.5. It's better than the Cosina, which I wouldn't pay more than £50-ish for (manual focus version), but the Cosina's still pretty good.
Posted 23/03/2011 - 14:29
Link
The Vivitar 55mm f2.8 Macro has a formidable reputation.
Best regards, John
Posted 07/04/2011 - 13:31
Link
The lens may be misreporting. There's no guarantee that non-Pentax lenses, especially o0ld ones, will show up correctly on newer bodies.
Best regards, John
Posted 07/04/2011 - 13:47
Link
Quote:
Using my PKA adaptor on the Tamron 90mm f2.5. It shows a max available aperture on my K-x of f4.0.
Your PK/A mount may not be working properly - some of them appear to suffer from an issue where threadlock has seeped through from a screw near the electrical contacts on the mount face. This threadlock isn't easily visible but effectively insulates part of the metal mount from one of the contacts on the camera which causes spurious behaviour with the aperture readings. Using my PKA adaptor on the Tamron 90mm f2.5. It shows a max available aperture on my K-x of f4.0.
If you clean the area of the metal Adaptall mount flange with a solvent based cleaner (such as nail varnish remover) about 15mm each side of the electrical contacts, it may help. I have 'fixed' one of my PK/A mounts with a similar problem this way. Some people advocate cleaning the mount face near the electrical contacts with fine emery paper, but I wouldn't recommend this because it damages the surface of the mount and also creates dust that could get into the lens or camera body.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


87 posts
15 years
BELMULLET