Sure you're not colourblind?
Posted 06/10/2010 - 23:21
Link
I have a slight problem there and in other parts of the spectrum. 170.
Posted 06/10/2010 - 23:50
Link
Joe S wrote:
Edit: I don't care much about spelling mistakes, but in the topic ...
Sorted. Edit: I don't care much about spelling mistakes, but in the topic ...
Dan
Posted 06/10/2010 - 23:57
Link
Mannesty wrote:
I...scored 3. I apparently have a slight problem in the green/blue part of the spectrum.
Exactly the same for me, can't be bothered to try it again at this time of night. I...scored 3. I apparently have a slight problem in the green/blue part of the spectrum.
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Posted 07/10/2010 - 00:09
Link
I managed 7! Which from what else I have been reading is a very good score.
What have I been reading? And reviewing and editting ... a discussion paper on the testing of dichromats in a safety critical environment and how protanopes, deuteranopes, and tritanopes can be identified and the effects mitigated.
What have I been reading? And reviewing and editting ... a discussion paper on the testing of dichromats in a safety critical environment and how protanopes, deuteranopes, and tritanopes can be identified and the effects mitigated.
.
K20D, *istD, MZ-S, Super-A, ME Super, MX
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, DA* 300,
DA 50-200, FA 24-90, FA 20-35,
M 400-600, A 50 f1.4, A 28 f2.8, A 70-210, M 35-80, M 50 f1.7
A x2S teleconverter and a few others ...
K20D, *istD, MZ-S, Super-A, ME Super, MX
DA* 16-50, DA* 50-135, DA* 300,
DA 50-200, FA 24-90, FA 20-35,
M 400-600, A 50 f1.4, A 28 f2.8, A 70-210, M 35-80, M 50 f1.7
A x2S teleconverter and a few others ...
Posted 07/10/2010 - 09:17
Link
4... but I did it 3 times and got 3 wildly different "error" regions (and score of 4 each time), so instead of showing my colour-perception difficulties I've either show the limitation of the test or my patience!
Colour is a very important aspect of my job, but one of the things you realise is that everyone perceives it differently, sometimes wildly differently, so there is no right and wrong.
Colour is a very important aspect of my job, but one of the things you realise is that everyone perceives it differently, sometimes wildly differently, so there is no right and wrong.
Still shooting in the dark (literally and metaphorically)...
Posted 07/10/2010 - 13:16
Link
Scored zero after ten minutes or so of disorganised tile shuffling. I've always thought I had good colour vision, so I was pleased to get a good result. However, it may be nothing to do with me, but be a testament to the quality of the Dell monitor I use at work.
Robert.
Robert.
Posted 07/10/2010 - 14:07
Link
Quite happy with a 3 at my age... Suppose I could have used the quality of the monitor as an excuse...
Regards
David
Retired at last - now all that time for photography - you would think: wink:
David
Retired at last - now all that time for photography - you would think: wink:
Posted 07/10/2010 - 17:12
Link
Zero. but I have my gender on my side.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
341 posts
18 years
Denmark .. or somewhere else
My score was less than perfect (11, where 0 is perfect) but then, I didn't care to spend all night doing it. After a while it started flickering before my eyes, but I have spent most day in front of the monitor. Also, I'm not sure how much the monitor's quality influences (I do know mine is the cheapest one available!)
What's your score?
Found the link on dpreview.
Edit: I don't care much about spelling mistakes, but in the topic ...
Stolen kit: Pentax K7 #3428965 and Pentax FA 43mm #0028350