stupid question

Darkmunk
Posted 09/09/2008 - 15:49 Link
Do the new * lenses mean the entire system is weather sealed or is the joint between camera and lens still vulnerable?
I could search for the answer but I want to make a cup of tea
Edited by Darkmunk: 09/09/2008 - 15:49
George Lazarette
Posted 09/09/2008 - 16:05 Link
There is a little rubber gasket around the base of the lens which seals the lens to the mount.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Darkmunk
Posted 09/09/2008 - 16:26 Link
Ah.. thanks,
I just got thinking because this sort of thing, although fun, is not particularly clever with a 16-45.
Comment Image


So I could just hose the whole lot down along with the wet suites?
George Lazarette
Posted 09/09/2008 - 16:42 Link
Darkmunk wrote:
So I could just hose the whole lot down along with the wet suites?
You could, though a wipe with a damp cloth might be the best way to deal with the photo-gear.

G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
amoringello
Posted 09/09/2008 - 17:56 Link
Also be gentle! Water pressure from a hose may be much greater than that from falling rain. Although water sealed, it does not mean water proof. Submerging (dropping) the camera into water would also be a bad idea.

I've put mine under the shower... the in-line water limiters keep the water pressure lower than the water falling from the past few severe rain storms I've been through with the camera.

I have not heard how the seals deal with salt water. It would be interesting to hear how the seals, such as those inside the lens that you cannot rinse off, would hold up over time. (Although, I suspect like anything else including SCUBA gear, it is best not to leave salt water in contact with anything for long periods. I'd like to know how people handle that situation.)
Edited by amoringello: 09/09/2008 - 17:58
Darkmunk
Posted 09/09/2008 - 18:25 Link
Hey George I just marked your post as helpful, whoo hoo! my first
Because before my tea was cold (or drunk) I had the answer.
I wouldn't really hose the ol' gear down of course, but it's useful to know what it can really tolerate. I reckon I could get away with a fairly major dunking in the sea and carefully washing it.
At the moment my camera and lens looks a bit like a kellogs frosty.
I'm thinking along the lines of J (shhh), that if it all goes tits up I'll have to by a nice set of DA* lenses.

Don't worry, I never sell anything (you're safe!)... crash and burn that's my motto.
gartmore
Posted 10/09/2008 - 08:38 Link
I'd be really concerned about the salt, I once saw it permanently mark the multicoating on Zeiss 10-100 16mm movie camera lens. The whole front group had to be replaced. This really is a situation where you should use a 'protective' UV filter.
Ken
“We must avoid however, snapping away, shooting quickly and without thought, overloading ourselves with unnecessary images that clutter our memory and diminish the clarity of the whole.” - Henri Cartier-Bresson -
beakynet
Posted 10/09/2008 - 14:37 Link
gartmore wrote:
I'd be really concerned about the salt, I once saw it permanently mark the multicoating on Zeiss 10-100 16mm movie camera lens. The whole front group had to be replaced. This really is a situation where you should use a 'protective' UV filter.
I also find that the extra long hood on my DA* 50-135 helps keep water off of the lens front. I never use the lens without it in rain. Come to think of it, I havent used the lens without the hood at all.
Bodies: K5IIs, K7, MZ5n, LX, MV
Lenses: DA*16-50, DA18-55WR, DA18-135, DAL35, M50 F2, A50 f1.4, FA50 f1.4, DA*50-135, DA55-300, Tamron 70-300, DFA 100 WR Macro, M135 f3.5, Sigma 120-400 APO DG HSM, Tokina 500 f8.0
Flash: Metz 58, Metz 48
Accessories: BG4, Pentax right angle finder, Pentax mirror adaptor lens, O-ME53 Viewfinder Loupe
Auto 110 System: Auto 110, Winder, 18mm, 24mm, 50mm, 70mm, 20-40mm, AF100P, 1.7x telecon

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo