Souk :: 56k beware!
Posted 20/02/2008 - 18:40
Link
Nice, but could it do with straightening up a touch?
K100D Super, 18-55, 50-200, Sigma 10-20, Sigma 70mm macro and lots of old lenses
Posted 20/02/2008 - 18:50
Link
Quote:
Nice, but could it do with straightening up a touch?
I agree that it does look to be sloping away.Nice, but could it do with straightening up a touch?
It also looks dark on my office monitor but will probably look lighter on my monitor at home.
Hyram
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Posted 20/02/2008 - 19:00
Link
good lighting, i'd suggest cropping the left side so the man is not so centered, take out the first two doors on the left.
Please call me aj,
I use a Pentax K10D, on a MacBook with LightRoom (vers 1.3 + beta 2)
http://www.ba-joseph.co.uk/gallery
I use a Pentax K10D, on a MacBook with LightRoom (vers 1.3 + beta 2)
http://www.ba-joseph.co.uk/gallery
Posted 20/02/2008 - 19:12
Link
Quote:
Nice, but could it do with straightening up a touch?
Ive been thinking it all weekNice, but could it do with straightening up a touch?
but I based the straightening against the fixed buildings rather than the poles that hold the souk roof up, I think they are sloped, as is the ground a tad.
Im not sure about the composition, because although its not in thirds, you get nice depth and diagonals at the moment, by cropping you kinda lose the effect of some of that

it just feels too tight to me
http://www.behance.net/robbranigan
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
Posted 20/02/2008 - 20:21
Link
Now you have cropped it too tight, take it back one doorway, to just to the left of the lit pillar.
Posted 20/02/2008 - 20:32
Link
I liked it how you had it in the first post, the slight leaning somehow adds to the overall "ramshackle" feeling which I think gives the picture its appeal, also I prefer the dark space on the left to the close-cropped one. I'd like to see a version somewhere between the two (crop wise) like Gwyn suggests above.
I prefer this to your photo on your other thread which is unusual for me as I normally get drawn to colour photos rather than black and white...
I prefer this to your photo on your other thread which is unusual for me as I normally get drawn to colour photos rather than black and white...
Joining the Q
Posted 20/02/2008 - 22:36
Link
I think this picture is better technically than it is aesthetically.
As you say, the light was right, and you have produced a gorgeous "print" with deep blacks, bright whites, and lots of detail in between. It's the sort of picture that film fans used to say couldn't be done with a digital camera.
But aesthetically, it doesn't quite cut it. The various rather complicated structures don't really add very much, and neither does the lad sweeping up. It's not a compelling composition. IMHO.
Which is a pity, because technically it's one to be proud of.
G
As you say, the light was right, and you have produced a gorgeous "print" with deep blacks, bright whites, and lots of detail in between. It's the sort of picture that film fans used to say couldn't be done with a digital camera.
But aesthetically, it doesn't quite cut it. The various rather complicated structures don't really add very much, and neither does the lad sweeping up. It's not a compelling composition. IMHO.
Which is a pity, because technically it's one to be proud of.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 20/02/2008 - 23:36
Link
I know exactly what you mean George
But since its for my project, im really glad its good technically
Because although aesthetically, its boring, it works and fits with the themes of the project
And the technical side of the photo shows off my skill to the examiners.
But since its for my project, im really glad its good technically
Because although aesthetically, its boring, it works and fits with the themes of the project
And the technical side of the photo shows off my skill to the examiners.
http://www.behance.net/robbranigan
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


565 posts
18 years
North of Liverpool,
England.
Part of my project on Ras Al Khaimah
Photojournalistic approach looking at people working
This guy was slowly clearing the path through, doing a good job
Dedication.
Very little editing
The lighting was perfect (in my opinion) at the moment i shot it
The other pictures, didnt turn out nearly as well lighting wise
decisive moment
K20D, DA18-55II, FA50 1.4, DA10-17
To buy: Metz 58 AF-1, DA*50-135, DA12-24, DA100M