Some Images - CC Please
Posted 28/08/2012 - 07:44
Link
Hi David
Just consumed the above images, I like the Wythburn Stones image most of all.
Just consumed the above images, I like the Wythburn Stones image most of all.
Fletcher8.
Posted 28/08/2012 - 08:14
Link
Hello David,
I think the "portrait" version of the first two doesn't work as well as a squarer crop. Perhaps in the "portrait" photos you were trying to avoid the "tired, hackneyed, cliched" lake district shots
#3 Not sure about the van it looks "out of place", at our club we have been told to try and avoid "unsupported foliage" so perhaps more tree and less van, but again the avoiding "tired etc" remarks apply
#4 Not sure if so much out of focus grey gravestone adds anything.
As a learner I downloaded your first two photo's and cropped them. To me they do look "better" but would only post them here (at the risk of being torpedoed ) with your permission.
I think the "portrait" version of the first two doesn't work as well as a squarer crop. Perhaps in the "portrait" photos you were trying to avoid the "tired, hackneyed, cliched" lake district shots
#3 Not sure about the van it looks "out of place", at our club we have been told to try and avoid "unsupported foliage" so perhaps more tree and less van, but again the avoiding "tired etc" remarks apply
#4 Not sure if so much out of focus grey gravestone adds anything.
As a learner I downloaded your first two photo's and cropped them. To me they do look "better" but would only post them here (at the risk of being torpedoed ) with your permission.
Posted 28/08/2012 - 10:40
Link
tyronet2000 wrote:
As a learner I downloaded your first two photo's and cropped them. To me they do look "better" but would only post them here (at the risk of being torpedoed ) with your permission.
You have my permission Stan!As a learner I downloaded your first two photo's and cropped them. To me they do look "better" but would only post them here (at the risk of being torpedoed ) with your permission.
Regards
David
Posted 28/08/2012 - 11:54
Link
davidstorm wrote:
Regards
David
Ok David, but as I said it's a learning exercise for me so be gentle if you feel I've totally marmalised your images tyronet2000 wrote:
As a learner I downloaded your first two photo's and cropped them. To me they do look "better" but would only post them here (at the risk of being torpedoed ) with your permission.
You have my permission Stan!As a learner I downloaded your first two photo's and cropped them. To me they do look "better" but would only post them here (at the risk of being torpedoed ) with your permission.
Regards
David


To quote another member "I'll get my coat"
Posted 28/08/2012 - 12:45
Link
I see what you're doing with the 'juxtaposition' - nice natural scene with a dirty great van dumped in it - but I think it would have been better if it had been a rusty wreck that was part of the scene rather than a roadworthy one. Not sure the HDR had very much effect in picture 1 though it's hard to say without seeing it 'before' - it doesn't jump out as being a HDR image.
No need to apologise for location, part of the fun is trying to find a decent photo wherever you are, though I'd imagine the Lake District is not short of subject matter.
No need to apologise for location, part of the fun is trying to find a decent photo wherever you are, though I'd imagine the Lake District is not short of subject matter.
Real name: Mike Edwards. My homage to seventies Vauxhalls: www.firenza.net
Camera - Pentax Kx, 18-55 kit lens, 18-200 Sigma, 50-500 Sigma, 500mm Tamron mirror
Camera - Pentax Kx, 18-55 kit lens, 18-200 Sigma, 50-500 Sigma, 500mm Tamron mirror
Posted 28/08/2012 - 13:05
Link
Another version of #1 David. If you'd rather it was removed, then we can ask John to do so.
Just cropped to get rid of some trees to the right and to move the house right of centre. Grad filter on the sky. Increased clarity to reduce the haze. Grad on the grass and de-saturated slightly to negate the saturation effect of the clarity adjustment to the foreground
All done in lightroom in 2 mins.

Just cropped to get rid of some trees to the right and to move the house right of centre. Grad filter on the sky. Increased clarity to reduce the haze. Grad on the grass and de-saturated slightly to negate the saturation effect of the clarity adjustment to the foreground
All done in lightroom in 2 mins.

Posted 28/08/2012 - 16:55
Link
If we take one and two together, I think they exhibit something of the same problem. Both arte split nearly 50/50 and both are slightly underexposed.
The latter point is probably due to the sky influincing the meter reading too much. Then, bringing up the shadow areas makes for a slightly forced look.
The former point results in two images in the first shot, and to some extent in the second. The sky plus a small amount of ground makes one image. The building with no sky makes another. I don't feel the two are much connected.
The solution could possibly be a full set of exposures to make a full HDR image, which would I think have more bite and drama to it. Take it too far though and it will look OTT. I would also decide on what the subject is and ensure that the natural focal point of the image is obvious to us and that you give us no choice but to look at it. This can be achieved using compositional guides well known in art, but also using light.
Hope you don't think I'm being negative, but landscape photography is not easy and this is all well worth working at. Alan has gone some way to tightening one image up, although the exposure still leaves the overall shot a little dullish.
The latter point is probably due to the sky influincing the meter reading too much. Then, bringing up the shadow areas makes for a slightly forced look.
The former point results in two images in the first shot, and to some extent in the second. The sky plus a small amount of ground makes one image. The building with no sky makes another. I don't feel the two are much connected.
The solution could possibly be a full set of exposures to make a full HDR image, which would I think have more bite and drama to it. Take it too far though and it will look OTT. I would also decide on what the subject is and ensure that the natural focal point of the image is obvious to us and that you give us no choice but to look at it. This can be achieved using compositional guides well known in art, but also using light.
Hope you don't think I'm being negative, but landscape photography is not easy and this is all well worth working at. Alan has gone some way to tightening one image up, although the exposure still leaves the overall shot a little dullish.
Best regards, John
Posted 28/08/2012 - 17:29
Link
I rather like the slight under-exposure, which reinforces the gloomy feeling that overcast skies induce. It's what I call the Betws y Coed look, deep dark greens and dripping leaves. Very atmospheric.
Stan's variations both work, but Alan's is a real corker, showing how effective a fairly fierce crop can be.
Cropping is bit like cooking fish, though the other way around. Most people are terrified of under-cooked fish, with the result that fish is nearly always over-cooked. Photographers, conversely, seem to be averse to cropping, with the result that many pictures aren't as good as they could be.
The ultimate picture for a cropoholic would be cropped down to one, elemental, pixel. The problem, of course, is choosing which.
G
Stan's variations both work, but Alan's is a real corker, showing how effective a fairly fierce crop can be.
Cropping is bit like cooking fish, though the other way around. Most people are terrified of under-cooked fish, with the result that fish is nearly always over-cooked. Photographers, conversely, seem to be averse to cropping, with the result that many pictures aren't as good as they could be.
The ultimate picture for a cropoholic would be cropped down to one, elemental, pixel. The problem, of course, is choosing which.
G
Keywords: Charming, polite, and generally agreeable.
Posted 28/08/2012 - 17:49
Link
Hi David
I agree with much that has already been said,
1 Is the best of the bunch to me - there is enough scope there to improve it
2. John's point on exposure is spot on - sky looks over - ground looks under - not sure this could be rescued. An ND grad could potentially have helped
3. Can't help thinking it would have been better to stand in front of the van
4. Is OK but for me just doesn't do anything for me
OK - as everybody seems to be having a go at a new version of number 1 - here is my effort

Get yourself up here David - We will spend a day doing nothing but landscapes
Carl
I agree with much that has already been said,
1 Is the best of the bunch to me - there is enough scope there to improve it
2. John's point on exposure is spot on - sky looks over - ground looks under - not sure this could be rescued. An ND grad could potentially have helped
3. Can't help thinking it would have been better to stand in front of the van
4. Is OK but for me just doesn't do anything for me
OK - as everybody seems to be having a go at a new version of number 1 - here is my effort

Get yourself up here David - We will spend a day doing nothing but landscapes
Carl
No matter how many lenses I have owned - I have always needed just one more
Posted 28/08/2012 - 20:09
Link
Thanks to everyone for the helpful comments and assistance! I purposefully posted some that I thought were 'difficult' to see what CC I could get and I think it's been a very worthwhile exercise. I really like Alan's re-working of #1, this is by far my favourite. All were shot without a ND grad, unlike some earlier in the day which were much better balanced (it had rained hard and I'd removed the filter and put it away).
Best wishes
David
Best wishes
David
Posted 28/08/2012 - 21:03
Link
My take:
I would brighten up the foreground in the first too images and crop 10% off the top of the first one and 50% off the top of the 2nd one
White vans have no soul whatsoever and particularly ruin a nice green scene - I would ditch it
The graveyard shot is by far the best, but spoiled by the right hand foreground stone which ruinsthe composition. Personaly I would ahve taken the shot either from the other side or from higher up looking to down to avoid the errant stone, or from some other angle other than head height.
Hope that helps
I would brighten up the foreground in the first too images and crop 10% off the top of the first one and 50% off the top of the 2nd one
White vans have no soul whatsoever and particularly ruin a nice green scene - I would ditch it
The graveyard shot is by far the best, but spoiled by the right hand foreground stone which ruinsthe composition. Personaly I would ahve taken the shot either from the other side or from higher up looking to down to avoid the errant stone, or from some other angle other than head height.
Hope that helps
[i]Bodies: 1x K-5IIs, 2x K-5, Sony TX-5, Nokia 808
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Lenses: Pentax DA 10-17mm ED(IF) Fish Eye, Pentax DA 14mm f/2.8, Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8, Pentax-A 28mm f/2.8, Sigma 30mm F1.4 EX DC, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.2, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-FA 50mm f/1.4, Pentax-A 50mm f/1.7, Pentax DA* 50-135mm f/2.8, Sigma 135-400mm APO DG, and more ..
Flash: AF-540FGZ, Vivitar 283
Posted 28/08/2012 - 22:49
Link
Thanks Smeggy, much appreciated. I quite like the white van one for the very reason you mention!
Regards
David
Regards
David
Posted 29/08/2012 - 09:58
Link
This doesn't look like a gloomy day, so I would agree that they need brightening up. This is a processed 5:4 crop of #2 -
[IMG]http://i1200.photobucket.com/albums/bb327/MrB154/Reworked%20Photos/13596_1346105709a1.jpg[/IMG]
Philip
[IMG]http://i1200.photobucket.com/albums/bb327/MrB154/Reworked%20Photos/13596_1346105709a1.jpg[/IMG]
Philip
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


4934 posts
15 years
Sheffield,
England
'House & Sky', K-m, DA 18-55WR kit lens, pseudo HDR in Photomatix 4.1
'Gate, Track and House', K-m, DA 18-55WR kit lens, Polariser
'Juxtaposition', K-m, DA 18-55WR kit lens, Polariser
'Wythburn Stones', K-x, Sigma 105 DG EX Macro wide open at F2.8
[img]
Thanks in advance, apologies they are all in the Lake District.
Regards
David
Nicola's Apartments, Kassiopi, Corfu
Some cameras, some lenses, some bits 'n' bobs