SMC A 50mm - which one?

RobE17
Posted 04/04/2009 - 17:47 Link
I've seen some of these lenses for sale with various apertures, for example the F1.7 version and the F2. Apart from the difference in apertures does either lens have any particular issues re build quality, etc?

Regards

Rob
beginner
Posted 04/04/2009 - 18:58 Link
Ihave the 1.7 and I love it!.......bought it for £40,in pristine condition,it's a beautiful lens ,great colour rendition and beautiful contrast............I've had no problems with it at all on the K20D!...
K20D...ist DS ,DA18/55,DA16/45.DA* 50/135,"A"1.7 50MM..."A" 70/210..M 50mm f2...Tamron 90mm macro,28/300 Tamron,200/500 Tamron 6.9....A Pentax DA*300... Sigma10/20,FA31mm 1.8 Ltd*********,FA 77mm Ltd!
amilner
Posted 04/04/2009 - 21:22 Link
They are all v. good
Some prefer the Bokeh of the 1.4 as it has 8 blades in the iris. the 2.0 and 1.7 have 6 and can give quite pronounced hexagons on oof highlights.

OTOH the 2.0 & 1.7 apparently have a flatter focus field and so are better for macro if put om extensions or a bellows. They are also rather cheaper secondhand.

I've had M versions of bosth 1.4 & 1.7 and liked both The As are optically the same. I don't have the 1.4 any more as I have the F1.4. Still use the 1,7 on my Super A

There is, of course the 1.2A which is rather heavy & expensive (and quite soft wide open, which rather ruins the point) and the 2,8A macro (which I also have) wich is a realy useful lens if you don't need the faster apertures
Tony Milner
Super A, ME Super, MZ6, K5II, Ricoh GR & lenses from 8-500mm
www.amilner.org
www.flickr.com/photos/tonymilner
Edited by amilner: 04/04/2009 - 21:23

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo