Sigma 18-35 f1.8
I am doing a shoot on Saturday and will probably use it most of the time, I could see it becoming my standard lens and replacing my Tamron 17-50 MKI. On a K5 with a grip it feels reasonably balanced, but obviously much heavier than the Tamron.
Tim
http://www.timpile.co.uk

Carl
No matter how many lenses I have owned - I have always needed just one more

Tim
http://www.timpile.co.uk
Just taken a test shot of the fireplace from our sofa, 1/25 @ 1.8 1000 ISO, images is nice and sharp, and also the extreme corners are sharp as well, which is not something you often get wide open with large aperture lenses. I suspect that I am going to enjoy this lens, a lot

That's enough thanks Tim - don;t want to hear any more

Carl
No matter how many lenses I have owned - I have always needed just one more
Oh and come on guys post a few samples please

Miles
Looking forward to seeing some shots.
And thoughts from owners regarding the focusing, which I am a bit worried about in view of my own experiences with the 85 1.4
Facebook Page
Plymouth Photographer
Coupling this Lens to the front of a K3, could be one of the all time dream combinations!
I'd welcome your thoughts.
It's not the strongest species that survive, nor is it the most intelligent. It is those most adaptable to change.
I received mine yesterday and have only done a few test shots with it, but it's pretty cool being able to focus and take shots when it looks pretty dark.
I am doing a shoot on Saturday and will probably use it most of the time, I could see it becoming my standard lens and replacing my Tamron 17-50 MKI. On a K5 with a grip it feels reasonably balanced, but obviously much heavier than the Tamron.
But Tim, isn't it a bit "short" at the long end for your kind of thing? I'd have thought OK for full length portraits but may introduce some distortion in head and shoulder pictures where 50mm or 70mm might be more flattering. It'll be interesting to see how you get on.
(I'd love one for landscapes, though...)
* Oh, just read mikedefieslife's post again. I'm not lugging that weight around the mountains of Wales and Spain no matter how good the image quality! Back to stopping down my kit lens.
Best wishes,
Andrew
"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference. All of them can record what you are seeing. But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050 http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
still waiting for our guys to report back....

Facebook Page
Plymouth Photographer
Surely they'd be better off with something in the 50mm - 70mm range on an APS-C sensor
The Sigma 35mm f1.4 has become a popular lens for wedding photographers. Used at 24mm I can see how the 18mm-35mm could be handy too.
Regards, Philip
I can't look past the FA 31mm
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/10-pentax-slr-lens-discussion/270250-pentax-fa31mm-f-1-8-limited-vs-sigma-18-35mm-f-1-8-a.html
K-3ii
smudge
Member
Forest Gate
Regards, Philip