Sigma 10-20

MrCynical
Posted 25/06/2011 - 02:45 Link
If Photozone's tests are to be believed (I know some here, and particularly on the Other Forum, distrust PZ since the 18-135 review ), the f3.5 version is inferior in sharpness/resolution to the older version. For what it's worth, I have the older (f4-5.6) version and love it.
Pentaxophile
Posted 25/06/2011 - 02:57 Link
MrCynical wrote:
If Photozone's tests are to be believed (I know some here, and particularly on the Other Forum, distrust PZ since the 18-135 review ), the f3.5 version is inferior in sharpness/resolution to the older version. For what it's worth, I have the older (f4-5.6) version and love it.
Only in the extreme borders at 10mm. I wonder if they're gone at 12mm? You do also get simpler distortion at 10mm and 7 rounded aperture blades, which is quite classy .

I went for the f4-5.6 version too though!
Edited by Pentaxophile: 25/06/2011 - 02:59
japers45
Posted 25/06/2011 - 07:12 Link
I ws about to sell mine to the poster and then couldnt part with it- sorry Karl! It is a really good lens.
flat4
Posted 25/06/2011 - 08:40 Link
I have the early F4-5.6 version. It's a superb lens to use for creative perspective work and landscapes.
Link to my PPG
karma mechanic
Posted 25/06/2011 - 09:56 Link
I wouldn't be without mine (f4-5.6 version). It must be said that I only use it at 10mm, so a 10mm prime that achieves that sort of IQ would be nice and perhaps smaller and lighter. Occasionally I've tried 12mm or even the other end at 20mm, but I prefer to keep it at 10 and move to get the right effect.

Sometimes mine has poorer IQ on the left side of the image, but in other images I can't detect that - it may be something to do with sensor movement with SR.

With hindsight I probably should have got the 8-16mm when it was on offer at SRS, I think I'd like that even more.
My own website is www.richardgaddphotography.com

Also on 500px
stopher
Posted 25/06/2011 - 10:27 Link
Karl...I started off like you with a 16-45 on my original K10. Great lens, but I often yearned for that little more 'width'. I went for the 10-20 f4-5.6 and quite honestly, I couldn't live without it....it's my favourite lens!
davidtrout
Posted 25/06/2011 - 11:06 Link
I have the Sigma 10-20mm f4-5.6 and love the results I get with it. My Pentax DA*16-50 gets more use but there are times when that just isn't wide enough.
David
Blythman
Posted 25/06/2011 - 12:27 Link
I couldn't resist it . Thanks for link Karl
Alan


PPG
Flickr
digitalCG
Posted 25/06/2011 - 13:28 Link
Got the earlier f4-5.6 version and use it often. Cracking lens, surprisingly versatile and never regretted breaking the bank to buy it over three years ago.
Blythman
Posted 28/06/2011 - 12:10 Link
Blythman wrote:
I couldn't resist it . Thanks for link Karl
Only had 7 available at a very good price, so I dived in. Arrived just now. On checking ebay there are still 6 left. I'm surprised I'm the only one who has bought one.
Alan


PPG
Flickr
aliengrove
Posted 28/06/2011 - 23:16 Link
Karl, I have sent you a pm regarding one of these lenses for sale.

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo