Shake reduction
Posted 09/11/2008 - 17:56
Link
ooooh who's the site heavyweights then
"Hold Infinity in the palm of your hand" William Blake
My current Harem comprising: "Mistress" Pentax-A 15mm F3.5, "Good Lady" Pentax-A 20mm F2.8, "Friendly Lady" Pentax-A 24mm F2.8, "Deviate Lady" Pentax 28mm F3.5 Shift, "Street Lady" Pentax-A 28mm F2.8, "Bohemian Lady" Pentax-A 35mm F2.0, "Retro Lady" SMC Pentax-M 40mm F2.8, "Special Lady" Pentax-A 50mm F1.2, "Femme Fatale" Pentax-A 50mm F2.8 Macro, "Sweetheart" Pentax-A* 85mm F1.4, "Lady Luck" Pentax* 135mm F1.8, "Gorgeous Lady" Pentax-A* 200mm F2.8 ED, "Duchess" Pentax-A* 300mm F4.0, "Lady Gaga & Entourage" Pentax-A* 300mm F2.8 ED [IF], "The Queen" Pentax 500mm F4.5
My current Harem comprising: "Mistress" Pentax-A 15mm F3.5, "Good Lady" Pentax-A 20mm F2.8, "Friendly Lady" Pentax-A 24mm F2.8, "Deviate Lady" Pentax 28mm F3.5 Shift, "Street Lady" Pentax-A 28mm F2.8, "Bohemian Lady" Pentax-A 35mm F2.0, "Retro Lady" SMC Pentax-M 40mm F2.8, "Special Lady" Pentax-A 50mm F1.2, "Femme Fatale" Pentax-A 50mm F2.8 Macro, "Sweetheart" Pentax-A* 85mm F1.4, "Lady Luck" Pentax* 135mm F1.8, "Gorgeous Lady" Pentax-A* 200mm F2.8 ED, "Duchess" Pentax-A* 300mm F4.0, "Lady Gaga & Entourage" Pentax-A* 300mm F2.8 ED [IF], "The Queen" Pentax 500mm F4.5
Posted 09/11/2008 - 18:06
Link
kerrowdown wrote:
ooooh who's the site heavyweights then
Can't really say! They'll corner me in the playground, beat me up, take my dinner money, and then flush my head down the toilet before de-bagging me and using me as a bike rack!!!!
ooooh who's the site heavyweights then
Posted 09/11/2008 - 19:44
Link
Tooks wrote:
amaturish..... real bullying starts with an atomic wedgie, so bad you wind up flossing your teeth with the waistband of your tighty-whities, for a warm up. Then it gets worse.
kerrowdown wrote:
ooooh who's the site heavyweights then
Can't really say! They'll corner me in the playground, beat me up, take my dinner money, and then flush my head down the toilet before de-bagging me and using me as a bike rack!!!! ooooh who's the site heavyweights then
Fired many shots. Didn't kill anything.
Posted 09/11/2008 - 20:14
Link
Don wrote:
Gulp!
Tooks wrote:
amaturish..... real bullying starts with an atomic wedgie, so bad you wind up flossing your teeth with the waistband of your tighty-whities, for a warm up. Then it gets worse.kerrowdown wrote:
ooooh who's the site heavyweights then
Can't really say! They'll corner me in the playground, beat me up, take my dinner money, and then flush my head down the toilet before de-bagging me and using me as a bike rack!!!! ooooh who's the site heavyweights then
Posted 10/11/2008 - 16:24
Link
iceblinker wrote:
The camera should not realise that it is moving in a particular plane once there is no acceleration or deceleration in that plane - in other words just after you have started to pan and are up to speed.
So for example if the bird was flying evenly from left to right and you were panning well except for some up and down wobbles, I think the camera should not be fooled by the panning but should compensate for the wobbles. It should work with diagonal panning as well.
Only one jerk in MY panning
Tooks wrote:
For instance, if you are trying to take photos of a bird in flight, then SR won't help get you a sharper image of the bird relative to a moving background.
I think it might if your panning is not perfectly smooth and has some jerks in it.For instance, if you are trying to take photos of a bird in flight, then SR won't help get you a sharper image of the bird relative to a moving background.
The camera should not realise that it is moving in a particular plane once there is no acceleration or deceleration in that plane - in other words just after you have started to pan and are up to speed.
So for example if the bird was flying evenly from left to right and you were panning well except for some up and down wobbles, I think the camera should not be fooled by the panning but should compensate for the wobbles. It should work with diagonal panning as well.
Cheers, Steve
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
369 posts
18 years
Lincolnshire,
UK
For instance, if you are trying to take photos of a bird in flight, then SR won't help get you a sharper image of the bird relative to a moving background.
The camera should not realise that it is moving in a particular plane once there is no acceleration or deceleration in that plane - in other words just after you have started to pan and are up to speed.
So for example if the bird was flying evenly from left to right and you were panning well except for some up and down wobbles, I think the camera should not be fooled by the panning but should compensate for the wobbles. It should work with diagonal panning as well.