setup with two masters & two slaves
There are cheaper alternatives for the slaves. Some of the more modern slave sensors have the option of triggering on the 1st, 2nd, 3rd etc flash.
I seem to remember that there are some studio lights that have this option as well.
The trouble is that this approach ends up with piles of cables, batteries, power packs etc, and for shooting small rooms this may not be practical at all.
Also worth mentioning to shoot RAW for these types of shots. Katrin Eismann has a section in one of her books, IIRC, that shows a single RAW with mixed lighting (and hence colour temperatures) that was multiply processed in the RAW converter, and then hand blended in Photoshop with layer masks. Sounds complicated... but isn't And the results were superb.
Of course, the additional thing you can do (once you're prepared to go the whole way and blend images for white balance correction) is to shoot multiple exposures - you should be able to do this nicely without any flash guns Once again, it's a case of either hand-blending, or running through HDR style applications like Photomatix, Artizen, etc.
I'll see if I can rustle up a link to Katrin's work... (her website is www.photoshopdiva.com )
Matt
(For gallery, tips and links)
(Sorry if I have misunderstood you, but it's a bit confusing with all the terms : master, slave, controller, main flash etc).
Regarding hdr and photoshop blending - I do that all the time already. But now I want a quick way to get decent exposures from start.
Thanks for comments
However, that's still an expensive way to go
I would say forget P-TTL altogether - it introduces too many variables in these circumstances. Do everything in manual and you can't go far wrong
I'd suggest some cheap slave triggers and two or three old flash guns (Vivitar, Sunpak etc). You know, the kind that only have "A" and "M" modes. It's best if they adjustable power ratios when in M mode.
You can't use your pop-up flash to trigger such dumb slaves though
You can (a) get an old Pentax AF160 as a simple slave, (b) use the AF540 on the camera set to "M" mode (you'll have to use the camera in "M" mode too )
Do everything in fully manual - that way you have complete control. With a bit of practice you can get the thing balanced quicker than it takes to set up the stands etc!
Matt
(For gallery, tips and links)
You can (a) get an old Pentax AF160 as a simple slave, (b) use the AF540 on the camera set to "M" mode (you'll have to use the camera in "M" mode too
Then your other two remote slaves will trigger from the AF540FGZ in your scenario where they are in a separate room.
If you can find one, the Pentax AF500-FTZ is magnificent; powerful, finely adjustable, with a reliable, inbuilt, slave trigger, and it also has a nice strobe mode which could be fun for creative types like Aminstar. Nowadays they go for about £70.00 or so.
G
- Manual mode, no P-TTL.
- AF160 on camera and my 540 as "first" slave.
- Optical slave triggers with any type of power adjustable guns as "last" slaves.
Matt, why is it that the pop-up flash cannot be used to trigger "dumb slaves" ? And in my above scenario, couldn't the AF160 be replaced by the pop-up ? If not, why (since only one flash is needed) ?
Ragnar
why is it that the pop-up flash cannot be used to trigger "dumb slaves" ? And in my above scenario, couldn't the AF160 be replaced by the pop-up ? If not, why (since only one flash is needed) ?
Thank you guys for helping me out with this !
Ragnar
G
Only point to bear in mind - if you use a dumb slave as a controller, then switch the AF540 to Slave 2 (IRRC). Slave 1 is for P-TTL... or was it the other way around ?
Anyway, you get the point
Matt
(For gallery, tips and links)
: ...switch the AF540 to Slave 2 (IRRC). Slave 1 is for P-TTL... or was it the other way around ?
Anyway, you get the point
Matt
I was just struggling with that issue when I found your comment. I switched to Slave2, and now I can even fire the 540 from a flourocent lamp ! So I can save myself from the troubleshooting now an spend some time on Ebay instead.
Thanks a lot.
Ragnar
why is it that the pop-up flash cannot be used to trigger "dumb slaves" ? And in my above scenario, couldn't the AF160 be replaced by the pop-up ? If not, why (since only one flash is needed) ?
Michal R. Hoffmann
K20D, DA 16-45mm, A 50mm F/1:1.4, DA 55-300mm; flash Pentax AF240Z
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


23 posts
17 years
Sweden
be very interesting to hear your recommendations on how to improve things.
Today, I have only one external flash (540 with diffusor), which I combine with the built-in flash (with a diffusor in front) set as
master since two light sources are better than one.
I'm not quite satisfied - especially in a big room or when two adjacent rooms are to be shot. I have considered radio triggers, but that means extra equipment that may/may not be reliable, more batteries that are exhausted at the wrong moment etc. Could I trigger the 540 (now set as master) from the built-in flash (still master) and just add one or two extra manual mode optical slaves (which will trigger from the nearest/strongest master) ? I realize that I need line of sight between the masters and the slaves. Since I'm using a pre-flash with the 540, the slaves must be able to handle that. Would I need Pentax slaves (360 ?) or are there cheaper alternatives (suggestions ?)? I only need manual mode for these.
Any advice is most appreciated.
Ragnar