Seek Advice Please - Macro/Portrait Lens
As I said, very much down to personal choice, the main reason I sold my Sigma was because you can't store the hood on it reversed ... silly I know but it really annoyed me.
Phil
My Flikr Page link
I would avoid the FA50 macro. While optically it is one of Pentax's better lenses, and it also has the very clear benefit of being a full frame lens... The lens sometimes has to hunt for focusing. Not that it should effect most macro subject, but do not try it at portraiture, one will typically miss a lot while the lens fully racks focusing; from infinity, then all the way to the closest focus setting, and then all the way back again
Brian
Regards
David
If you want to use the lens for both macro and portrait, it has to be the Sigma 105mm DG EX Macro. It's great for macro images, but utterly superb for portraits, it has a beautiful natural colour rendering and lovely soft bokeh. Forget the Pentax for portraits, it doesn't work well in this mode.
Regards
David
Thanks: Brian
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
20 posts
11 years
I am on a tight budget and are looking to purchase a new prime lens suitable for macro and/or portrait photography. This will be the first lens I have owned with macro capabilities. The lens will be used on my K7.
I have been looking at and considering:-
1. Pentax D-FA 100mm F2.8 WR Macro . Currently £339.00 at SRS.
2. Sigma 70mm F2.8 EX DG Macro. Currently £249.99 at SRS
I am leaning towards the Sigma, it is around 90 quid cheaper, has been rated highly in reviews and, has apparently good Brokeh capabilities. The Pentax on the other hand has also been rated quite highly and has the advantage of being WR.
Grateful for any advice. Seasonal Greetings To All