Rose in winter

gramar
Posted 14/12/2015 - 14:45 Link
Testing my newly acquired DA16-45 I took this photo before it was really light this morning.

K-30 f4 45mm ISO 200

Comment Image
joostdh
Posted 14/12/2015 - 16:13 Link
A fine lens, I’m sure it will give you a lot of pleasure.
Pentax K-1| D-FA 24-70mm | FA 43mm F1.9 Ltd | FA* 85mm F1.4 | D-FA 100mm F2.8 Macro WR | DA* 200mm F2.8 | Pentax AF 540FGZ
BruceStrachan
Posted 14/12/2015 - 16:15 Link
I'm glad you're enjoying the lens already...
Keen as mustard. ...
Good shot in low light.
Cheers,

Bruce
gramar
Posted 14/12/2015 - 16:34 Link
Thanks both

From RAW I darkened the exposure by a little and then sharpened it every so slightly and that was it. Given that it was overcast and and required on board flash for this handheld image I'm more than pleased with how it turned out.
Edited by gramar: 14/12/2015 - 16:34
McGregNi
Posted 14/12/2015 - 20:31 Link
It's a rather nice result from 'on-board' flash, which after all is supposed to be so harsh and blunt as to be practicality unusable!

There's nice natural colour and good exposure control. There doesn't really seem to be much ambient exposure at all, mostly only flash exposure. I'm curious to know which camera mode did you use, and did you specifically reduce ambient exposure and flash compensation settings .... ?

The truth is, it's extremely rare to see a shot taken in this particular technical manner on the forum.
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
Edited by McGregNi: 14/12/2015 - 20:33
Aitch53
Posted 15/12/2015 - 10:07 Link
McGregNi wrote:
It's a rather nice result from 'on-board' flash, which after all is supposed to be so harsh and blunt as to be practicality unusable!
...
Are these any use for dealing with that 'problem'?
SteveH!

Some people call me 'strange'.
I prefer 'unconventional'.
But I'm willing to compromise and accept 'eccentric'.
McGregNi
Posted 15/12/2015 - 10:23 Link
I'm sure it would help, although it doesn't turn it into a much larger light source, so you're still getting hard direct flash which will have the same issues as the un - diffused pop-up. It would probably reduce some of the highlight reflections though which could be useful. Nothing is going to replace the effectiveness of off -camera diffused flash coming from an angle, but where direct on -camera is the only option then a modifier like that JJB one is worthwhile I'd guess.

It works ok with the rose here because there's nothing behind it to show any dark outline shadows, which never look good. Fill lit portraits outdoors can work well with the pop-up also for the same reason. So its best when the subject stands well apart from the background.
My Guides to the Pentax Digital Camera Flash Lighting System : Download here from the PentaxForums Homepage Article .... link
Pentax K7 with BG-4 Grip / Samyang 14mm f2.8 ED AS IF UMC / DA18-55mm f3.5-5.6 AL WR / SMC A28mm f2.8 / D FA 28-105mm / SMC F35-70 f3.5-4.5 / SMC A50mm f1.7 / Tamron AF70-300mm f4-5.6 Di LD macro / SMC M75-150mm f4.0 / Tamron Adaptall (CT-135) 135mm f2.8 / Asahi Takumar-A 2X tele-converter / Pentax AF-540FGZ (I & II) Flashes / Cactus RF60/X Flashes & V6/V6II Transceiver
bwlchmawr
Posted 15/12/2015 - 15:44 Link
Nicely isolated against that dark background: makes such a difference.
Best wishes,

Andrew

"These places mean something and it's the job of a photographer to figure-out what the hell it is."
Robert Adams
"The camera doesn't make a bit of difference.  All of them can record what you are seeing.  But, you have to SEE."
Ernst Hass
My website: http://www.ephotozine.com/user/bwlchmawr-199050
http://s927.photobucket.com/home/ADC3440/index
https://www.flickr.com/photos/78898196@N05
tyronet2000
Posted 19/12/2015 - 11:48 Link
Very nice image
Regards
Stan

PPG
gramar
Posted 19/12/2015 - 23:30 Link
McGregNi wrote:
It's a rather nice result from 'on-board' flash, which after all is supposed to be so harsh and blunt as to be practicality unusable!

There's nice natural colour and good exposure control. There doesn't really seem to be much ambient exposure at all, mostly only flash exposure. I'm curious to know which camera mode did you use, and did you specifically reduce ambient exposure and flash compensation settings .... ?

The truth is, it's extremely rare to see a shot taken in this particular technical manner on the forum.
I always shoot RAW and AV mode. Settings used were RAW, AV, f4, 45mm, ISO 200 & 1/30th sec exposure. I use flash only when I need to as I nearly always shoot handheld. It was a little after 8am on a dark and overcast morning. I didn't alter ambient exposure and my flash was set for zero (so no compensation reduction) and it worked perfectly. I find the flash on my K-30 works very well for me and I usually find I need to turn it down to -0.7 for best results. By comparison I'm not so lucky with the built in flash on my Panasonic TZ compact. That is virtually unusable.
Edited by gramar: 19/12/2015 - 23:31

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo