Quick Feedback Required
Posted 03/04/2009 - 22:09
Link
At this image size it doesn't seem a strong effect, maybe a little more would be helpful?
It depends what you want of course but here the light doesn't seem diffused very much.
It depends what you want of course but here the light doesn't seem diffused very much.
Best regards, John
Posted 03/04/2009 - 22:19
Link
when you have such an aappealing subject, whatever it does for you is where I would want to be. The flowers in the background kinda bother me, but that is me. It woudl be great to have a family picture in the background, maybe the grandparents, even a head and shoulder shot worked into the greenery. Just a suggestion/ Is it a boy or a girl? the baby, I mean... regards Ronald
Posted 03/04/2009 - 22:22
Link
It's a boy. (Not mine btw) ! It was a favour to some of my wifes colleagues, I was expecting more of a formal shoot but they just wanted some informal family shots in the garden.
My main concern was over the focus effect, I don't want to lose too much detail, but it has to look deliberate obviously.
My main concern was over the focus effect, I don't want to lose too much detail, but it has to look deliberate obviously.
Posted 04/04/2009 - 00:37
Link
Bob, I'm rather a newbie, but...
1) I like the postprocessed picture more, it's softer, and the lady on the picture looks better (in my opinion). However if you could save her... ermm... blouse? (I never know the names of women's clothes) from it - the texture is lost.
2) It looks a bit overexposed, if you take look at her hand and the child's cheeks and nose. Not sure if you can get a bit more RAW processing?
I'm really a beginner with post-processing, so cannot help much, I'm afraid - you're far superior with that kind of work
And as far as I know, parents are usually happy with they babies' pictures even when not perfect (at least when I think about my family or friends) - if it is a family (home) picture, not a studio, etc. And probably it's worth taking a number of different pictures, preselect and show / offer them on CD, then they can pick what they want to print themselves.
1) I like the postprocessed picture more, it's softer, and the lady on the picture looks better (in my opinion). However if you could save her... ermm... blouse? (I never know the names of women's clothes) from it - the texture is lost.
2) It looks a bit overexposed, if you take look at her hand and the child's cheeks and nose. Not sure if you can get a bit more RAW processing?
I'm really a beginner with post-processing, so cannot help much, I'm afraid - you're far superior with that kind of work
And as far as I know, parents are usually happy with they babies' pictures even when not perfect (at least when I think about my family or friends) - if it is a family (home) picture, not a studio, etc. And probably it's worth taking a number of different pictures, preselect and show / offer them on CD, then they can pick what they want to print themselves.
Kind regards,
Michal R. Hoffmann
K20D, DA 16-45mm, A 50mm F/1:1.4, DA 55-300mm; flash Pentax AF240Z
Michal R. Hoffmann
K20D, DA 16-45mm, A 50mm F/1:1.4, DA 55-300mm; flash Pentax AF240Z
Posted 04/04/2009 - 10:24
Link
[IMG]http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b399/philstaff/sf1.jpg[/IMG]
Think I prefer number 1 to be honest dont know if a tighter crop may work better for you.
Ian
Think I prefer number 1 to be honest dont know if a tighter crop may work better for you.
Ian
Posted 04/04/2009 - 21:33
Link
I prefer No. 1 (tweaked version), not least for the more flattering skin tone.
Hyram
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Bodies: K20D (2), K10D, Super A, ME Super, Auto 110 SLR, X70, Optio P70
Pentax Glass: DA* 300, DA* 60-250, DA* 50-135, DA* 16-50, DA 70 Ltd, FA 31 Ltd, DA 35 Ltd, DA 18-55 (2), DA 12-24, DA 10-17, M 200, A 35-70, M 40, M 28, Converter-A 2X-S, 1.4X-S, AF 1.7, Pentax-110 50, Pentax-110 24
Other Glass: Sigma 105 macro, Sigma-A APO 75-300
Flash: Metz 58 AF-1 P, Pentax AF160FC ringflash, Pentax AF280T
Posted 04/04/2009 - 22:49
Link
Hyram wrote:
I prefer No. 1 (tweaked version), not least for the more flattering skin tone.
I agree she has better skin tones
I prefer No. 1 (tweaked version), not least for the more flattering skin tone.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


1030 posts
17 years
South Wales,
UK
[IMG]http://i134.photobucket.com/albums/q105/RR76/sf1.jpg[/IMG]
Thanks, Bob