Question about M42 to PK adaptors
After making this recess, I use thread lock if the M42 thread is loose enough for the lens to turn.
.
Pentax:K5ii, K7, K100D, DA18-55, DA10-17, DA55-300, DA50-200, F100-300, F50, DA35 AL, 4* M50, 2* M135, Helicoid extension, Tak 300 f4 (& 6 film bodies)
3rd Party: Bigmos (Sigma 150-500mm OS HSM),2* 28mm, 100mm macro, 28-200 zoom, 35-80 zoom, 80-200 zoom, 80-210 zoom, 300mm M42, 600 mirror, 1000-4000 scope, 50mm M42, enlarger lenses, Sony & micro 4/3 cameras with various PK mounts, Zenit E...
Far to many tele-converters, adapters, project parts & extension tubes etc.
.[size=11:].Flickr• WPF• Panoramio
I have made sure with mine that the adaptors are tightly screwed to the lens, with a paper gasket between adaptor and lens if required, and I've had no issues at all. I've removed the spring clip on all of mine.
Regards
David
That's the way it works. You put the adapter on a lens and then fit the lens to the body. Then you can unscrew and replace that lens with any other screw mount lens as desired. This requires the clip so the whole lot doesn't fall out.
Some marques do it the other way round, where each lens has to be adapted. Obviously there are advantages to both approaches, but the Pentax way is simple and only needs one adapter per body.
I understand why people might want to remove the locking clip, but it makes for more difficult working and has potential dangers. It doesn't take long to remove the adapter even with the clip. Not the Pentax one anyway, which fits properly.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


2523 posts
16 years
Here,
there,
everywhere
My Website
PPG
flickr
G+
Facebook