Progressively closer
Posted 18/06/2008 - 12:21
Link
Wow Fantastic shot I can't fault that. The colours contrast very well.
Camera:|K-7|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
Pentax Lenses:|DA12-24/f4 ED AL|DA35Ltd Macro|FA31Ltd|FA77Ltd|FA50/1.4|F70-210|FA20-35 f4/AL|A*200/f4 Macro ED|A50/1.7|A50 Macro f2.8|1.7xAF adapter|
Voigtlander|125/f2.5SL Macro APO Lanthar|
Sigma Lenses:|EX DG 100-300 f4|2X & 1.4X TC|
Flashes:|AF540FGZx2|RingFlash AF160FC|
Posted 18/06/2008 - 19:01
Link
Nice composition and colours, but looking at the full size version, I can't help but think the quality's suffering, probably due to that teleconverter. Nothing looks properly defined, not from being out of focus, or due to camera shake, but just a bit fuzzy over all.
I'd be inclined to try some test shots with and without the converter, just to see how much it affects the image quality.
Dan
I'd be inclined to try some test shots with and without the converter, just to see how much it affects the image quality.
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Posted 18/06/2008 - 19:44
Link
Quote:
Nice composition and colours, but looking at the full size version, I can't help but think the quality's suffering, probably due to that teleconverter. Nothing looks properly defined, not from being out of focus, or due to camera shake, but just a bit fuzzy over all.
I'd be inclined to try some test shots with and without the converter, just to see how much it affects the image quality.
Dan
To be honest I don't think I could get that close without the converter.Nice composition and colours, but looking at the full size version, I can't help but think the quality's suffering, probably due to that teleconverter. Nothing looks properly defined, not from being out of focus, or due to camera shake, but just a bit fuzzy over all.
I'd be inclined to try some test shots with and without the converter, just to see how much it affects the image quality.
Dan
I will give it a bash tomorrow just to see.
Posted 18/06/2008 - 23:12
Link
I replied to that before seeing your other thread, and the fly there looks nicely detailed. But, being two different subjects may well confuse things, and it may be the contrast on the fly's eye that gives the impression of sharpness. Nice shot though, and very well done with the focusing.
Dan
Dan
K-3, a macro lens and a DA*300mm...
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


13627 posts
18 years
Hythe,
Hampshire UK
Starting to quite like this teleconverter thing, all images are manual focus, hand held and uncropped.
I could have got a LOT closer I reckon but he was getting a bit twitchy as it was
Click on pic for flickr and insane size.