Portrait shots with natural light Advice needed please
Posted 15/03/2007 - 07:28
Link
Yes I'm off out this afternoon to try again.
Thanks for the comments
Pete
Thanks for the comments
Pete
Posted 15/03/2007 - 07:41
Link
Quote:
But I'm curious as to why you framed the shots with the edge of the tree trunk splitting her in half both times. For me it rather spoils them, since to my mind the background distracts from the actual subject.
Hi ChrisBut I'm curious as to why you framed the shots with the edge of the tree trunk splitting her in half both times. For me it rather spoils them, since to my mind the background distracts from the actual subject.
Yes I agree I need to pay more care when I compose. I think I was paying more attension to her pose rather than the background itself
Pete
Posted 15/03/2007 - 07:53
Link
Just another thought folks I don't want to really mention this again as it was a big issue last time but one word "calibration".
It is ok changing settings in on the PC with silkypix or similar software to get the desired result on your own monitor for your eyes but the result may look totally different on another monitor to someone else.
This will obviously lead to a variety of views good and bad. In the end you don’t really know if the image is correct or not. I suppose the printed result will tell but unfortunately we can't all see that unless we are fortunate enough to get a shot published in a magazine.
Pete
It is ok changing settings in on the PC with silkypix or similar software to get the desired result on your own monitor for your eyes but the result may look totally different on another monitor to someone else.
This will obviously lead to a variety of views good and bad. In the end you don’t really know if the image is correct or not. I suppose the printed result will tell but unfortunately we can't all see that unless we are fortunate enough to get a shot published in a magazine.
Pete
Posted 15/03/2007 - 08:31
Link
Hi Pete,
calibration isn't setting up the monitor so it "looks good".. it's setting up the monitor so that it's accurate. This means that if I look at an image here, and so does one of our members across the world, both with properly calibrated monitors, they should look the same.
There are plenty of threads about monitor calibration here, and you can always ask for specifics as well.
Cheers
Liam
calibration isn't setting up the monitor so it "looks good".. it's setting up the monitor so that it's accurate. This means that if I look at an image here, and so does one of our members across the world, both with properly calibrated monitors, they should look the same.
There are plenty of threads about monitor calibration here, and you can always ask for specifics as well.
Cheers
Liam
Liam
"Make your hands respond to what your mind demands." Jesse James
Best wide-angle lens? Two steps backward. Look for the 'ah-ha'. Ernst Haas
"Make your hands respond to what your mind demands." Jesse James
Best wide-angle lens? Two steps backward. Look for the 'ah-ha'. Ernst Haas
Posted 15/03/2007 - 08:39
Link
The simplest way to start is to at least use Adobe Gamma, which you will find under Control Panel on your PC.
It works quite well on a CRT, but I understand less well on flat screens.
It works quite well on a CRT, but I understand less well on flat screens.
Best regards, John
Posted 16/03/2007 - 17:20
Link
I am interested in the discussion of the ExpoDisk I have seen these advertised and intrigued......
I have an old Video Camera (shoulder mounted JVC type - remember them!) that came with a large filter that you placed over the lens to set the White Balance. I assume this will also work with a camera lens?
Have to battle the loft and have a try.
I have an old Video Camera (shoulder mounted JVC type - remember them!) that came with a large filter that you placed over the lens to set the White Balance. I assume this will also work with a camera lens?
Have to battle the loft and have a try.
'Life looks simple through a viewfinder'.....then I went Digital!
Keith
K3 III, DA* 16-50, HD DA 16-85, DA* 50-135, DA* 300, HD 55-300 PLM, HD 1.4x, AF360
Keith
K3 III, DA* 16-50, HD DA 16-85, DA* 50-135, DA* 300, HD 55-300 PLM, HD 1.4x, AF360
Posted 17/03/2007 - 00:34
Link
Frequent use of a Whibal (white balance reference card) has solved all of the white balance problems I used to have. I can either set the white balance first manually or include the Whibal in one photograph and then use it to apply the correction in Adobe Camera RAW to any photographs taken under the same lighting conditions.
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.


6378 posts
19 years
Leeds,
UK
Portraiture isn't really my thing, but I do agree with others comments, the backgrounds are awful (sorry) , could you find a plain wall somewhere and thow it out of focus?
I think the exposures about right, IMHO a slight over exposure is more flattering for the ladies, cant comment on skin tones as I dont know what it looks like on your monitor and mine is suspect at the mo'
Advice on getting the model to look at the camera is spot on, one good tip is to pose the model, preferably with chin slightly up then ask them to remain still while YOU move around with the camera, tell them to follow the lens with their eyes only.
Very nice shots though, she looks a natural born poser, I bet her mum is over the moon with them just as they are, but this is a photography forum and we aint her mum, so get it right next time or we'll slap your wrists
My PPG link
My Flckr link