Pollock Country park
Posted 10/09/2013 - 18:28
Link
Shot #1 perhaps a tad over-exposed, TT??.. 2,3, and 4 are all "bang on the money" for me though!!
Posted 10/09/2013 - 19:05
Link
Ah! That brings back memories of a PU meet .
Have to agree with Steven's comments.
Have to agree with Steven's comments.
Posted 10/09/2013 - 19:17
Link
I like #1, but it is a little overexposed, and I'd like to of seen more of the bench the fella's on, maybe a 16:9 wide screen type shot?
The rest are nice and colourful, not a bad set
The rest are nice and colourful, not a bad set
One day you'll find, 10yrs have got behind you.
Posted 10/09/2013 - 21:09
Link
I'm still struggling with the fact that it's not as wide as the 18-250 - I have to be far more careful - Yes I agree with the comments about #1 - as I got it it was too dark - since it's in RAW I'll just have another go at bringing it up a bit .
Yes indeed Gwyn - it brings back memories - folk lying at full stretch shooting daffodils etc
Again - could have done with a CPL - particularly for where the ducks were - real problems there [ which is why I haven't put any of them on ]
It certainly is a little beauty of a lens I'm glad you decided it was surplus to requirements Andrew
Yes indeed Gwyn - it brings back memories - folk lying at full stretch shooting daffodils etc
Again - could have done with a CPL - particularly for where the ducks were - real problems there [ which is why I haven't put any of them on ]
It certainly is a little beauty of a lens I'm glad you decided it was surplus to requirements Andrew
let the education continue
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
Posted 10/09/2013 - 21:19
Link
Any better ?
1) original
And redone version
2)
1) original
And redone version
2)
let the education continue
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
Posted 10/09/2013 - 21:26
Link
#2 has a slightly blue cast to it. Comparing it to #1, I think you just need to lift the greens ever so slightly - so slightly that probably you cannot immediately detect it with the human eye!
Posted 10/09/2013 - 21:33
Link
Oh great
PP is NOT my speciality
Back to the drawing board [ AKA Aperture ] Great thing is I can take it back to the original every time and just totally re-work it.
Tomorrow morning for that - so I'm working in daylight .
Thanks for the help
PP is NOT my speciality
Back to the drawing board [ AKA Aperture ] Great thing is I can take it back to the original every time and just totally re-work it.
Tomorrow morning for that - so I'm working in daylight .
Thanks for the help
let the education continue
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs
Add Comment
To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.
4141 posts
17 years
Glasgow
ISO 200 f7.1 1/500
ISO 200 5.6 1/400 AV
ISO 200 f8 1/400
ISO 200 f7.1 1/500
proud owner of a couple of cameras and a few bits and bobs