Pochard

coker
Posted 20/01/2011 - 22:41 Link
Shot late this afternoon at our local Wiltshire Wildlife Trust reserve.

K7, 55-300 @300, 1/200th sec. @f5.8, hand-held, manual focus,cropped & pp in PSE9.


Comment Image
[IMG]http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af340/rogerhlane/LangfordLakes025crop_filteredcropii.jpg[/IMG]

C&C welcome.

Coker.
The more I look, the more there is to see!
sandinista
Posted 21/01/2011 - 09:45 Link
I think I would be tempted to lighten the shadows a touch Roger. Very nice image.
Great simplicity is only won by an intense moment or by years of intelligent effort. T.S Eliot

Gear Not enough!!
PPG
Flickr
My not so new website
Mannesty
Posted 21/01/2011 - 10:44 Link
There appears to be some odd green artefacts in the background and unfortunately, your subject is not sharp.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
Oggy
Posted 21/01/2011 - 12:07 Link
Mannesty wrote:
...and unfortunately, your subject is not sharp...
Possibly due to 300mm at 1/200th hand held. Not impossible, but a bit of a challenge.
thoughton
Posted 21/01/2011 - 13:23 Link
I think it's reasonably sharp, but could be better. The beak looks okay, but the eye doesn't. This is wide open at 300mm, perhaps stop down a bit if possible (what was the ISO?).
Tim
AF - Pentax K5, Sigma 10-20/4-5.6, Tamron 17-50/2.8, Sigma 30/1.4, Sigma 70-200/2.8, Tamron 70-300/4-5.6
MF - Vivitar CF 28/2.8, Tamron AD2 90/2.5, MTO 1000/11
Stuff - Metz 58 AF1, Cactus v4, Nikon SB24, Raynox 150, Sigma 1.4x TC, Sigma 2x TC, Kenko 2x macro TC, Redsnapper 283 tripod, iMac 27”, Macbook Pro 17”, iPad, iPhone 3G
FlickrFluidrPPGStreetPortfolio site
Feel free to edit any of my posted photos! If I post a photo for critique, I want brutal honesty. If you don't like it, please say so and tell me why!
Mannesty
Posted 21/01/2011 - 13:57 Link
I think that there are several factors influencing the lack of sharpness in this image.

1: The shutter speed is too slow at 1/200th for a 300mm lens.
2: The aperture is too wide making any available DOF very small.
3: The available light didn't allow the use of more appropriate figures for 1 & 2 above and excessively high ISO (though we don't yet know what was used) on the K7 introduces noise.
4: The eyes are not in the plane of focus.
5: The image is cropped, perhaps a bit too much.
Peter E Smith - flickr Photostream
coker
Posted 21/01/2011 - 14:31 Link
Thanks for all comments, folks.
ISO was 400.
Crop is about 40% of the original.

As ever(?), it was a case of needs must: the light was what it was, I only have the 55-300,the level of crop is necessary to get a reasonable size (of bird) onto an A4 print.

....But apart from that, everything's fine!

I'll keep trying!

Roger.
The more I look, the more there is to see!
sandinista
Posted 21/01/2011 - 15:08 Link
I've taken the liberty of playing around with it Roger, see what you think. I always set my shutter speed at around 1/320 when shooting at the long end of my 55-300. Unfortunately or fortunately depending on the situation, shooting with a zoom at them long end means a reduced DOF. If you are using shutter priority for moving wildlife/birds I always find upping the ISO is necessary for low light. Neat Image is a good noise reduction software which can be used in PSE.

[IMG]http://i1098.photobucket.com/albums/g370/jimbo_609/LangfordLakes025crop_filteredcropii1.jpg[/IMG]
Great simplicity is only won by an intense moment or by years of intelligent effort. T.S Eliot

Gear Not enough!!
PPG
Flickr
My not so new website
Edited by sandinista: 21/01/2011 - 15:26
coker
Posted 21/01/2011 - 15:30 Link
Thanks, Jim, & of course I don't mind!

That certainly is an improvement. I had put mine though Neat Image, using the"recommended" settings. Perhaps something a little stronger was required...

Roger.
The more I look, the more there is to see!

Add Comment

To leave a comment - Log in to Pentax User or create a new account.



Proudly supporting Pentax User

Samsung Logo Asahi Pentax Logo